Fruitbat
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- May 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,297
- Reaction score
- 2,397
You haven't answered my point. It's supposed to make your society safer, and it's evident it doesn't. People are still fighting in clubs.Because conceal carry permits are tougher to get and you can't get them in some places. Guarantee you, if you had conceal carry permits and/or allowed to have a side arm strapped to wherever you wanted to go (except government buildings), people would knock that crap off pretty quick. The research proves it. Don't give me this european nonsense, it's not safer. Have you had your acid attack yet today? How about a truck or bomb attack yet? safer, what a typical "progressive" opinion. you're not safer there, you're more exposed.
I think there's been 5 or 6 acid attacks in the UK in the past year.
If concealed carry doesn't stop club fights, it's not going to stop committed jihadists.
I am a Brexit voter and vote UKIP who are a party who mainly campaign against progressives and political correctness.
Not even the far right in this country campaign for gun ownership. You aren't allowed them for self defence, However, I think allowing them for this purpose in remote, rural areas under strict control wouldn't be a bad thing.
I also support US rights to own guns - the US has historically had gun ownership and there is nothing you can do to fix it. Handing in guns would be pointless as you are an armed society and criminals would keep theirs. The only thing I object to, is holding on to the belief that gun ownership is "safer" because it isn't -every stat in the book says it isn't. It may be more moral, aimed at stopping government tyranny etc etc etc....but when shooting happen and some inbred bumpkin shouts "well, if all the kids in that classroom had guns this wouldn't have happened"....THAT is what I, and most people with a sanity chip, take offence to,