I think the scale is bullsh!t but I'll go ahead anyway.
CrashOverRide said:
I know looks are super subjective... but I think there are some universal physical qualities in women that a majority of men seem to be attracted to. Because I don't believe there is such a thing as a perfect 10, I'd say this girl is a 9. Thoughts?
http://regionalhotties.com/usa-hotties/midwest-models/ashley/
El Payaso pretty much said the same things I did
I've got four ratings - 0 (ugly), 1 (better than w@nking), 2 (would bang) and 3 (would girlfriend). On that scale, she's a 1. Why isn't she attractive? because she has virtually no @ss, hips or legs. Because of her lack of a feminine shape she doesn't look like a girl to me, she looks like a transgender teenage boy with a lot of applied cosmetics. I do prefer really big girls but if she at least had the shape of a grown woman I would be able to feel something for her. I'm not drawn to her face either.
I think this thread proves how diverse men's tastes are but I find all the guys insulting us for saying we don't personally find her desirable are a f*cking joke lol.
Your really looking at the likes of Kate Upton for someone no guy would rate under 9
What if I told you that girl could not be more than a 1 to me either?