mrgoodstuff
Master Don Juan
Its still relationships... In dating people will be even more risky than these stats.That's marriage. Is marriage the goal around here? Certainly isn't for me.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Its still relationships... In dating people will be even more risky than these stats.That's marriage. Is marriage the goal around here? Certainly isn't for me.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
I’ve only know a few and yeah they weren’t looking for a husband.I have known many middle aged men having sexual relations with women in their 20s. Marriage was never the goal.
What male demographic makes up this 20%? Are we talking about pro-athletes, celebs, Silicon Valley millionaires? I’m not trying to be sarcastic I honestly want to know. Is there data on it?Women are already trying to latch onto the top 20%. Nothing about our instincts has changed. The hindrbrain operates as if it is still 1200 BC
Same here i find it hard to believe.What male demographic makes up this 20%? Are we talking about pro-athletes, celebs, Silicon Valley millionaires? I’m not trying to be sarcastic I honestly want to know. Is there data on it?
What male demographic makes up this 20%? Are we talking about pro-athletes, celebs, Silicon Valley millionaires? I’m not trying to be sarcastic I honestly want to know. Is there data on it?
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
The ones you mentioned are top 3%What male demographic makes up this 20%? Are we talking about pro-athletes, celebs, Silicon Valley millionaires? I’m not trying to be sarcastic I honestly want to know. Is there data on it?
Thanks for this but I’m wondering if there is data outside the manosphere? Sorry it’s not a dig at you but it would be like me giving you data from a feminist site lol. Both tend to be skewed imo.![]()
I think that for a men to be attractive to a women its.more than physical attractivness, and that on OLD men are at a disadvantage. Some smv stuff cant be seen on a pic.This graph is from okcupid. Women rate 80% of men as below average in attractiveness (below 5/10).
View attachment 3103
Rollo often links to data outside the manosphere. So, I linked you to one of his many articles.Thanks for this but I’m wondering if there is data outside the manosphere? Sorry it’s not a dig at you but it would be like me giving you data from a feminist site lol. Both tend to be skewed imo.
I’m wondering what non gender biased data is out there. I can take a look I’m sure there’s something because I know that there’s a hierarchy of desirable men but I’m interested to know what the attributes are, what the percentage is and what the data is on women dating them to the exclusion of men outside that percentage.
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
Thanks for the chart. For sure OLD is a woman’s market so definitely an inflated sense of their SMV as has been discussed here many times.This graph is from okcupid. Women rate 80% of men as below average in attractiveness (below 5/10).
View attachment 3103
Here is some info Rollo pointed out to me on Twitter a while back.Thanks for this but I’m wondering if there is data outside the manosphere? Sorry it’s not a dig at you but it would be like me giving you data from a feminist site lol. Both tend to be skewed imo.
I’m wondering what non gender biased data is out there. I can take a look I’m sure there’s something because I know that there’s a hierarchy of desirable men but I’m interested to know what the attributes are, what the percentage is and what the data is on women dating them to the exclusion of men outside that percentage.
Feminists say and do and refer to ‘data and studies’ in the exact same manner, and they have been doing it for far far longer than the manosphere. There are many aspects of it that parallel feminist thought and approach.Rollo often links to data outside the manosphere. So, I linked you to one of his many articles.
Comparing the manosphere to feminists is comparing apples to oranges. Data inside the manosphere has often proved reliable. Especially from the PUAs as they go out and field test theories.
Yeah I have heard this about Tinder before. I think, because it’s basically a hook up causal sex site, women will try to f**k a hot guy over trying to date a regular one.Here is some info Rollo pointed out to me on Twitter a while back.
![]()
Tinder Experiments II: Guys, unless you are really hot you are probably better off not wasting your…
by Worst-Online-Datermedium.com
He also has often shown data proving that women's peak SMV is in the early 20s and men's in the 30s.
Imo bias data.most of the time like this articleFeminists say and do and refer to ‘data and studies’ in the exact same manner, and they have been doing it for far far longer than the manosphere. There are many aspects of it that parallel feminist thought and approach.
And PUA’s usually post videos of success after how many failed attempts and there have been rumours that some hire women to pretend.
I’m not saying that everything in the manosphere is BS because it certainly isn’t, just like not everything in feminism is totally BS. However there is a lot of bias. And of course an agenda.
I tend to take both heavily one sided views with a grain of salt to be honest.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Don’t even get me started on that one lol:Imo bias data.most of the time like this article
Poor women no men are financially stable enough for them.
Like the lack of financially stable men are affecting women the most. This is solipsism if i ever saw it.
What about those men that lost their purpose and cant perform in the feminist brainwash word.
![]()
US marriage rates may be dipping because of a shortage of financially stable men, study suggests
Articles and videos about US marriage rates may be dipping because of a shortage of financially stable men, study suggests on FOX 10 Phoenix.www.fox10phoenix.com
At 39 i notice something similar same age and older women are way more direct towards me.Im 41.... look early to mid 30s when i shave.... the dating scene here in Vancouver isnt in my favor at all... all the ladies in my age range dont seem to take care of themselves at all... i dont understand wtf... and i can't for the life of me seem to attract anything younger than me by even a few years.... older than me is np... all of them seem to be average to "a few extra lbs" .... ugh... im fit.... work out some.. fairly muscular with a bit of body fat to cut.. when my face is shaved i look way young... but im losing my hair so i shave it off Jason Stathom style.... makes me wonder if i am stuck with settling for meh puzzy or just forget about it all.... *shrugs*
But thats because those men are afraid of smart successful women, not because those women wasted their best years becoming successful obvBecause ultimately she won’t respect him. Without respect, there is no relation.
The pool for high earning women, thus, is small. And guess where the high earning (good looking) men who earn more than her are? With younger women who are not earning much lol
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.