mrgoodstuff
Master Don Juan
I was forced into it and was very productive and focused.I respect it obviously. It's an important stepping point to get to a higher level.
I thought you were arguing against it before.
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
I was forced into it and was very productive and focused.I respect it obviously. It's an important stepping point to get to a higher level.
I thought you were arguing against it before.
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
You make a lot of assumptions. I think I came from a principled position and notOne of the lowest positions of sophistry anyone can take on the internet honestly. Mr good stuff and I are discussing our past based on observation. Women *we* rejected(this caused confusion because you don't see it as possible). If you don't like it you should go somewhere else lol.
Ok I can work with that.I was forced into it and was very productive and focused.
I guess there is not much to commend to your strawmanning.You demonstrated confusion, them admitted you were barely in the game. Well, the last part was obvious.
so how do you see it?trying to philosophically explain to him how I see men and women and nature and the world differently.......
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
I'm here because I have faults and want to improve myself.so how do you see it?
on which side of the spectrum you are and what are you actually doing here (not being cynical or judging, maybe a little bit sexist and curious)
Are u just curious about red pill
OkayI'm here because I have faults and want to improve myself.
I'm here because I'm horrified there's so few confident, dominant men in societies as relates to their roles with women and I'm scared.
I'm here as a distraction to occupy my mind and emotions so I keep no contact with my ex.
I'm here to note if there's many other humans who have decided to go childfree by choice like me.(the nkaf in my profile name stands for no kids and fixed)
I'm here to make a public record of accountability and learning.....a place where I'm stimulated and corrected and brought to deeper understanding of things.
almost finished reading book Waken the Tiger that covers the healing of trauma. Best one on trauma I've read so far.resilience, distress tolerance and adaptability are lowered when there's unattended grief or abuse from childhood.
Resilience, distress tolerance and adaptability are vital for maintaining inner game. Its the characteristics of the survival of the fittest.
That's because ur society teaches their men to treat women as some sort of celebrity.I'm here because I'm horrified there's so few confident, dominant men in societies as relates to their roles with women and I'm scared.
pretty much nailed it Spaz.That's because ur society teaches their men to treat women as some sort of celebrity.
Because of that, women treats them like celebrities treats fans.
Now if only the men here (who claims red pilled maxxed) treats women as if they are their fans, then the women would treat them like celebrities.
Problem solved.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
is this scientifically proven? or men are conditioned to think that sex is Gold?Women have one key advantage over men in this regard - the male desire for sex far outweighs the female desire for sex. As long as this leverage exists in an unregulated sexual marketplace then females will always be the celebrities and the males will always be the fans.
I'm not sure if this is proven scientifically but I do know in talking with many women that they are perfectly fine in taking breaks from men for 1-10 years or more, including sex. I've met/dated women that have been to themselves for a few years without any issues. I can't really say the same for men though...Is
is this scientifically proven? or men are conditioned to think that sex is Gold?
woman after 40 don't count, also woman with children, is not they take a "break", is they are so low on the market there is not even a guy crazy enough to try her.I'm not sure if this is proven scientifically but I do know in talking with many women that they are perfectly fine in taking breaks from men for 1-10 years or more, including sex. I've met/dated women that have been to themselves for a few years without any issues. I can't really say the same for men though...
Women know how to regulate themselves(at least some) where as guys can't.
If a guy could get sex with a lot of women at any given time, I don't think you'll see him staying at home where as women can do this easily.
These are high quality women I'm talking about from age 28-51. I don't know how may people here on this forum has gone out with many high quality women before.woman after 40 don't count, also woman with children, is not they take a "break", is they are so low on the market there is not even a guy crazy enough to try her.
You're right. I agree.you are supposed to think spaz has no idea what hes talking about.....
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Do you know why you think like that and I think differently?Women have one key advantage over men in this regard - the male desire for sex far outweighs the female desire for sex. As long as this leverage exists in an unregulated sexual marketplace then females will always be the celebrities and the males will always be the fans.
then we need to state a metric, what would consider a quality woman? only schoolarship is week, and I know most here who consider a quality woman I wouldn't so, and serious I do prefer to stay alone then with someone who will drag me down or hold me back, dating around is so damn easy I see little reason to settleThese are high quality women I'm talking about from age 28-51. I don't know how may people here on this forum has gone out with many high quality women before.
Everyone has their version but what I mean by HQ is someone that has come from a good family and maintains a strong bond with them, has a good job, mentally stable, is not a protestor/hardcore feminist, is off or doesn't participate much in social media, has had long term relationships and is LTR oriented, has good positive role models/friends, etc.then we need to state a metric, what would consider a quality woman? only schoolarship is week, and I know most here who consider a quality woman I wouldn't so, and serious I do prefer to stay alone then with someone who will drag me down or hold me back, dating around is so damn easy I see little reason to settle
Yeah they can be rare indeed. I've been fortunate to have been in a position to date quite a few. I don't know what it is about me or the vibe I give off to attract these types either. Just earlier this year, I dated a COO and I'm thinking what the hell does she possibly see in me. LOLhave dated one or two lol...one of them also came from a bad family and talked a lot of sh!t later. Its pretty pathetic how rare they are.
no one said is not, but saying woman don't need is wrong.Look at this this way. How many women are buying d!ck pics on OnlyFans?
How many men are making a living by posting selfies of their butt on Instagram?
How many average male joes create a tinder account and get 1000 matches in a day?
The thirst is real, gentleman.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.