Ken785
Master Don Juan
i wanna go back in time and live in the 80s again...and see how different things were...that would rock! Back to the future was a great movie!
She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.
You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.
The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
What an idiot. Democracy is bullsh1t when most of the population is a composed of idiots.Danger said:Voting for the candidate that best represents you is never a waste.
Idealistic but untrue. There should be a 3+ party system, but the way it is now, third parties are meaningless in the presidential elections.Danger said:Voting for the candidate that best represents you is never a waste.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
DUDE! i suggested that already...scroll up.joekerr31 said:all youd have to do is what they did in back to the future. get a book that tells you who won every baseball and football game and you'd be a billionaire in no time.
yeah but you know what that means...you would have to live in that time then...because if you go back to the present whose name is that investment going to be under? yourself? were you even born yet? and if you were to approach your parents they would probably think you were a crazy man and have the police come and put you in an asylum! Then you'd be really fvcked..put in an asylum...and an asylum in the past at that! Nobody would believe you are from the future!Kev07 said:You know, I'd definetely go get a million dollar loan, and dump it into Apple when it first came out.
but if you did go back have molest yourself youd instantly have an attitude change because you are changing your future/present self at that time...just like if you killed your child self you'd instantly disappear because your future self would no longer exist...joekerr31 said:what if a child molester was able to go back in time and he went back in time and molested himself.
then the child him would grow up with the sole purpose of killing his older self who molested him.
BUT, when the child him became an adult he would become the adult him which would mean that he would do what his adult self did and travel back in time and molest the child version of himself.
hmmmm.
i think im going to pitch this to fox.
does anyone have an email address for the producers of tv shows at fox?
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
it could follow "to catch a prediter"joekerr31 said:what if a child molester was able to go back in time and he went back in time and molested himself.
then the child him would grow up with the sole purpose of killing his older self who molested him.
BUT, when the child him became an adult he would become the adult him which would mean that he would do what his adult self did and travel back in time and molest the child version of himself.
hmmmm.
i think im going to pitch this to fox.
does anyone have an email address for the producers of tv shows at fox?
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
This is what is called a "Grandfather's Paradox". If you went back in time and killed your child self, then your child self wouldn't be able to grow up, get in the time machine, and kill his younger self. Similarly, if you went back and killed a young version of your grandfather, then he wouldn't have been able to have your father/mother, who wouldn't have been able to have you, and you wouldn't be able to go back and kill him. Pretty ****ed up, but interesting to think about nonetheless.Ken785 said:but if you did go back have molest yourself youd instantly have an attitude change because you are changing your future/present self at that time...just like if you killed your child self you'd instantly disappear because your future self would no longer exist...
Cowhead418 said:This is what is called a "Grandfather's Paradox". If you went back in time and killed your child self, then your child self wouldn't be able to grow up, get in the time machine, and kill his younger self. Similarly, if you went back and killed a young version of your grandfather, then he wouldn't have been able to have your father/mother, who wouldn't have been able to have you, and you wouldn't be able to go back and kill him. Pretty ****ed up, but interesting to think about nonetheless.
ketostix said:Right but what never made sense to me is under that view of time travel, ie, when you go back you would find your past self. So in the past you have the "future" you and the past you existing side by side. So what if the future you bought the winning lottery ticket before the drawing and went back to the future to cash it in, would the lottery ticket disappear when you leave the past/arrive in the future since the past you never actually bought that number?
I know this all just theoretical/philosophical, it's kind of fun to ponder. But what would happen if you did something to your past self, that caused you to either not make the time machine? Would the instant you interact with your past self and do whatever leads to the change make the time machine disappear, leaving you stuck in the past with 2 selfs? lol. What if you killed your pastpast self What I'm getting at is even if time travel was possible I don't think there would be any grandfather paradoxes if there can be 2 selfs existing at the same time.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.