Ken785
Master Don Juan
i wanna go back in time and live in the 80s again...and see how different things were...that would rock! Back to the future was a great movie!
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
What an idiot. Democracy is bullsh1t when most of the population is a composed of idiots.Danger said:Voting for the candidate that best represents you is never a waste.
Idealistic but untrue. There should be a 3+ party system, but the way it is now, third parties are meaningless in the presidential elections.Danger said:Voting for the candidate that best represents you is never a waste.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
DUDE! i suggested that already...scroll up.joekerr31 said:all youd have to do is what they did in back to the future. get a book that tells you who won every baseball and football game and you'd be a billionaire in no time.
yeah but you know what that means...you would have to live in that time then...because if you go back to the present whose name is that investment going to be under? yourself? were you even born yet? and if you were to approach your parents they would probably think you were a crazy man and have the police come and put you in an asylum! Then you'd be really fvcked..put in an asylum...and an asylum in the past at that! Nobody would believe you are from the future!Kev07 said:You know, I'd definetely go get a million dollar loan, and dump it into Apple when it first came out.
but if you did go back have molest yourself youd instantly have an attitude change because you are changing your future/present self at that time...just like if you killed your child self you'd instantly disappear because your future self would no longer exist...joekerr31 said:what if a child molester was able to go back in time and he went back in time and molested himself.
then the child him would grow up with the sole purpose of killing his older self who molested him.
BUT, when the child him became an adult he would become the adult him which would mean that he would do what his adult self did and travel back in time and molest the child version of himself.
hmmmm.
i think im going to pitch this to fox.
does anyone have an email address for the producers of tv shows at fox?
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
it could follow "to catch a prediter"joekerr31 said:what if a child molester was able to go back in time and he went back in time and molested himself.
then the child him would grow up with the sole purpose of killing his older self who molested him.
BUT, when the child him became an adult he would become the adult him which would mean that he would do what his adult self did and travel back in time and molest the child version of himself.
hmmmm.
i think im going to pitch this to fox.
does anyone have an email address for the producers of tv shows at fox?
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
This is what is called a "Grandfather's Paradox". If you went back in time and killed your child self, then your child self wouldn't be able to grow up, get in the time machine, and kill his younger self. Similarly, if you went back and killed a young version of your grandfather, then he wouldn't have been able to have your father/mother, who wouldn't have been able to have you, and you wouldn't be able to go back and kill him. Pretty ****ed up, but interesting to think about nonetheless.Ken785 said:but if you did go back have molest yourself youd instantly have an attitude change because you are changing your future/present self at that time...just like if you killed your child self you'd instantly disappear because your future self would no longer exist...
Cowhead418 said:This is what is called a "Grandfather's Paradox". If you went back in time and killed your child self, then your child self wouldn't be able to grow up, get in the time machine, and kill his younger self. Similarly, if you went back and killed a young version of your grandfather, then he wouldn't have been able to have your father/mother, who wouldn't have been able to have you, and you wouldn't be able to go back and kill him. Pretty ****ed up, but interesting to think about nonetheless.
ketostix said:Right but what never made sense to me is under that view of time travel, ie, when you go back you would find your past self. So in the past you have the "future" you and the past you existing side by side. So what if the future you bought the winning lottery ticket before the drawing and went back to the future to cash it in, would the lottery ticket disappear when you leave the past/arrive in the future since the past you never actually bought that number?
I know this all just theoretical/philosophical, it's kind of fun to ponder. But what would happen if you did something to your past self, that caused you to either not make the time machine? Would the instant you interact with your past self and do whatever leads to the change make the time machine disappear, leaving you stuck in the past with 2 selfs? lol. What if you killed your pastpast self What I'm getting at is even if time travel was possible I don't think there would be any grandfather paradoxes if there can be 2 selfs existing at the same time.
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.