"You'll Never Feel READY to Walk Over"

Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.

You've been "getting ready" for two years.

She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.

Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.

Read more...

I'm just disappointed...

HaleyBaron

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
2,749
Reaction score
2,332
That case should have been dropped and her laughed out of the police station. She has no standing case, and it's clear it's just MeToo resurgence to further ignite female fanbase. Unfortunately, it's at least working socially. Anti rape and Jane Doe propaganda plastered all over social media. Hate this timeline.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
762
That case should have been dropped..
The DA did initially drop it when first presented to him in 2024 for lack of evidence according to her written statement. I don't know all the facts but it's been said he's been railroaded and pressured into reopening.
 

HaleyBaron

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
2,749
Reaction score
2,332
Then it's clear that it was politically motivated. Right on schedule.
 

klh

New Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
'Jane Doe' consented to the threesome [... with] Matt Ingalls. ... At one point she had said "stop" and they stopped.
Yes, the first threesome was consensual. Then 7 guys read Snapchat and eagerly ran up for "free *****". Ingalls later lied that men entered the room because the party was crowded. In other words, Ingalls secretly and deliberately set her up. I have seen (possibly fake) Snapchats online that they previously set up other women.

She pushed Diego Sarabia away and he respected. But then 7 men "commanded" her to do more ketamine, she was too intimidated to leave because she was surrounded and naked under the covers, and she felt coerced to do more drugs. Finally, Ingalls and Lopes took her away for another threesome. I am concerned that Ingalls took advantage of involuntary intoxication. No mean no; it does not mean give her more drugs until she is incapable of saying no. This might not pass the threshold of criminal proof beyond reasonable doubt and I would not throw defendants in prison for years. But dang, the girl dropped out of Cornell and at least deserves a tuition refund.

New York law says consent is too damn hard to figure out after the fact. So if a New York woman got voluntarily drunk, then the criminal law does not protect her (unless she was unconscious). Other states have different laws about intoxicated consent.
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
762
But then 7 men "commanded" her to do more ketamine, she was too intimidated to leave because she was surrounded and naked under the covers, and she felt coerced to do more drugs.
Where did you get this information? I am not saying it's incorrect but I have been following closely and I have never heard or read this.

No one coerced her and it was her idea to take the ketamine off one man"a penis later during the night. She has admitted this in text messages to Matt. And other written statements

In fact, in one of her texts to Matt that has been discovered, she stated that the sexual stuff that night was not illegal, she enjoyed her time with him and xxzz (another defendant) and expressed interest in doing it again. That she loved him and he was her King.

She may be claiming now two years later she felt coerced and intimidated but I dunno the evidence doesn't really support this as it stands now.

Also Matt Ingalls has claimed and the others corroborated, that HE was so drunk at one point and in and out of consciousness and SHE proceeded to s*ck his c0ck and tried to wake him up.

Since he was actually incapacitated would it be fair to say that she sexually assaulted him? He is now claiming he was and considering filing his own lawsuit

I don't know and hopefully the entire truth will come to light as the investigation continues or during trial.

I know the burden and laws are different in each state. In CA for example where I live, if a person is simply intoxicated there can be no consent. In New York the bar is higher.
 
Last edited:

"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"

Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."

You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.

She's been waiting forty minutes.

Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.

Read more...

nicksaiz65

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
4,084
Reaction score
1,722
Age
29
Where did you get this information? I am not saying it's incorrect but I have been following closely and I have never heard or read this.

No one coerced her and it was her idea to take the ketamine off one man"a penis later during the night. She has admitted this in text messages to Matt. And other written statements

In fact, in one of her texts to Matt that has been discovered, she stated that what happened that night was not illegal, she enjoyed her time with him and expressed interest in doing it again. That she loved him and he was her King.

She may be claiming now two years later she felt coerced and intimidated but I dunno the evidence doesn't really support this as it stands now.

Also Matt Ingalls has claimed and the others corroborated, that HE was so drunk at one point and in and out of consciousness and SHE proceeded to s*ck his c0ck and tried to wake him up.

Since he was actually incapacitated would it be fair to say that she sexually assaulted him? He is now claiming he was and considering filing his own lawsuit

I don't know and hopefully the entire truth will come to light as the investigation continues or during trial.

I know the burden and laws are different in each state. In CA for example where I live, if a person is simply intoxicated there can be no consent. In New York the bar is higher.
Oh wow. Thats the law in CA? I’d have to do more research. So what does this imply about two drunk people, similar to what Ingalls is claiming?
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
762
Oh wow. Thats the law in CA? I’d have to do more research. So what does this imply about two drunk people, similar to what Ingalls is claiming?
">>Under California law, sexual activity with a person who is too intoxicated to give legal consent is considered rape or sexual assault (California Penal Code Section 261).

What the Law Says
    • Legal Definition: According to the California Legislative Information for Penal Code 261, rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person who is prevented from resisting by intoxication, and the accused knew or reasonably should have known the person was intoxicated.
 
Top