JohnChops
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2012
- Messages
- 2,734
- Reaction score
- 481
I second Corey Wayne. He clearly
Loves life and what he does. It's infectious.
Loves life and what he does. It's infectious.
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
I didn't say anything about intervention. I am not for government intervening to stop corporate greed because then you get all sorts of programs that are overreach like affirmative action. A corporation should be free to be greedy, and citizens should be free to either work or not work for them. I don't want to change the economic system, we need to change the stigma that says anybody who says "**** this, this system is not for me" is lazy. A guy like me or OP should not be guilt-tripped because we don't want to work 50 hours a week playing office politics for 40 years. But to anybody who wants that, have at it.I have to ask. How can one be against corporate greed (see: capitalism) yet identify as a "conservative libertarian"? Isn't the entire basis of libertarian thought "less government more freedom", aka less intervention so private entities can push policies that benefit shareholders and not society?
So basically you think that some weak sauce principles about freedom are more important than outcomes...that response was a retarded shoulder shrug at a problem that we could solve to improve the lives of everyone. The irony of your opinion and line of thinking is that corporations have more overreach into society than our government could ever hope to have. In case you haven't noticed corporations do much more than solely offer employment, or not offer employment, to people. Even the corporations that we will never work for, will influence our lives in some way. Does net neutrality ring any bells? That's just one example.I didn't say anything about intervention. I am not for government intervening to stop corporate greed because then you get all sorts of programs that are overreach like affirmative action. A corporation should be free to be greedy, and citizens should be free to either work or not work for them. I don't want to change the economic system, we need to change the stigma that says anybody who says "**** this, this system is not for me" is lazy. A guy like me or OP should not be guilt-tripped because we don't want to work 50 hours a week playing office politics for 40 years. But to anybody who wants that, have at it.
What is this babble? You're all over the place here.So basically you think that some weak sauce principles about freedom are more important than outcomes...that response was a retarded shoulder shrug at a problem that we could solve to improve the lives of everyone. The irony of your opinion and line of thinking is that corporations have more overreach into society than our government could ever hope to have. In case you haven't noticed corporations do much more than solely offer employment, or not offer employment, to people. Even the corporations that we will never work for, will influence our lives in some way. Does net neutrality ring any bells? That's just one example.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
I second this. Cleaning up your diet can have an enormous impact on your mental well being. Have your system fueled with clean energy is of the utmost importanceOP needs to improve his diet. When you eat right and your liver is not overloaded with toxins, you wake up super early. I get up at 3:30am like clockwork (and I never use an alarm clock), and I get to work by 5. The other day I worked until 6:30pm and then went out and did shots, and still showed up at 5am the next day. I wasn't always like this. Hardly. I used to want to sleep until 10 and still felt tired after.
And for the love of God get out of your parents house.
It's easy enough to bandy about these theories that never will happen so they can never be proved wrong.http://www.returnofkings.com/75222/why-we-should-strive-for-mass-unemployment
Hey TicTac (and marmel75 for that matter), head over to the link above to read why we should be striving for 80% unemployment.
UH OH...that's gonna ruffle some feathers here...