JohnChops
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2012
- Messages
- 2,734
- Reaction score
- 481
I second Corey Wayne. He clearly
Loves life and what he does. It's infectious.
Loves life and what he does. It's infectious.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
I didn't say anything about intervention. I am not for government intervening to stop corporate greed because then you get all sorts of programs that are overreach like affirmative action. A corporation should be free to be greedy, and citizens should be free to either work or not work for them. I don't want to change the economic system, we need to change the stigma that says anybody who says "**** this, this system is not for me" is lazy. A guy like me or OP should not be guilt-tripped because we don't want to work 50 hours a week playing office politics for 40 years. But to anybody who wants that, have at it.I have to ask. How can one be against corporate greed (see: capitalism) yet identify as a "conservative libertarian"? Isn't the entire basis of libertarian thought "less government more freedom", aka less intervention so private entities can push policies that benefit shareholders and not society?
So basically you think that some weak sauce principles about freedom are more important than outcomes...that response was a retarded shoulder shrug at a problem that we could solve to improve the lives of everyone. The irony of your opinion and line of thinking is that corporations have more overreach into society than our government could ever hope to have. In case you haven't noticed corporations do much more than solely offer employment, or not offer employment, to people. Even the corporations that we will never work for, will influence our lives in some way. Does net neutrality ring any bells? That's just one example.I didn't say anything about intervention. I am not for government intervening to stop corporate greed because then you get all sorts of programs that are overreach like affirmative action. A corporation should be free to be greedy, and citizens should be free to either work or not work for them. I don't want to change the economic system, we need to change the stigma that says anybody who says "**** this, this system is not for me" is lazy. A guy like me or OP should not be guilt-tripped because we don't want to work 50 hours a week playing office politics for 40 years. But to anybody who wants that, have at it.
What is this babble? You're all over the place here.So basically you think that some weak sauce principles about freedom are more important than outcomes...that response was a retarded shoulder shrug at a problem that we could solve to improve the lives of everyone. The irony of your opinion and line of thinking is that corporations have more overreach into society than our government could ever hope to have. In case you haven't noticed corporations do much more than solely offer employment, or not offer employment, to people. Even the corporations that we will never work for, will influence our lives in some way. Does net neutrality ring any bells? That's just one example.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
I second this. Cleaning up your diet can have an enormous impact on your mental well being. Have your system fueled with clean energy is of the utmost importanceOP needs to improve his diet. When you eat right and your liver is not overloaded with toxins, you wake up super early. I get up at 3:30am like clockwork (and I never use an alarm clock), and I get to work by 5. The other day I worked until 6:30pm and then went out and did shots, and still showed up at 5am the next day. I wasn't always like this. Hardly. I used to want to sleep until 10 and still felt tired after.
And for the love of God get out of your parents house.
It's easy enough to bandy about these theories that never will happen so they can never be proved wrong.http://www.returnofkings.com/75222/why-we-should-strive-for-mass-unemployment
Hey TicTac (and marmel75 for that matter), head over to the link above to read why we should be striving for 80% unemployment.
UH OH...that's gonna ruffle some feathers here...