Dude, you have never seen a vagina before bud. You got a theory. Cucked!You're redefining words to suit your worldview. Whoring is far more naturally feminine than otherwise. It takes a tremendous amount of social pressure to discourage that behavior, and even then it's prevalent.
But as far as the original argument: Masculinity by itself =/= feminine response. On an island, ya. If you were the last of a handful of options, girls would be submissive and feminine and whatever else you wanted in order to survive. You could also make the argument that you shouldn't invest in girls who aren't submissive, and I'd agree. And you could make the argument that women cannot be submissive in the absence of a dominant man, and I'd agree.
But as far as real world, practical advice, in America in 2019, you're not gonna get a lot of mileage out of this. And OP knows it doesn't hold up, or else he would come back with an actual argument instead of getting butthurt and falling back on ad-hominem (which are hilarious btw).
But as far as meeting girls, having the more naturally submissive one submit to you, and salvaging the ones that can be salvaged, just being naturally masculine isn't enough to get on the radar. There's too much competing emotional stimuli, which is why you have to be able to make an emotional impact and convey a lot of value, neither of which are natural behaviors, but neither is carrying around cellphones or driving cars or wearing fitted clothes.
And I encourage men to get in touch with their dominant, masculine, ambitious side as much as anybody. For YOURSELF and for YOUR PIECE OF MIND. But as far as attraction, it's not much use until after you've fvcked her. So encouraging guys who might otherwise be happy with their lives outside of lacking sexual options to spend a lot of time investing in something they may or may not want or fixing all this stuff that may or may not be broken, when all that stuff may or may not solve their initial problem, is pretty misguided.
But we'll compare notes in 10 years