Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
No test is 100% accurate, but I disagree with you. I've given this test to almost all of my friends, exes, and my current girl. I know these people's personalities like the back of the hand, and in many cases I was able to predict what result they would get.theres only one thing we can learn from this nad heres a clue, the people who got pleasing results from the test think it is acurate, those who got unwnated results think it is BS.
maybe the test is acurate maybe it isnt, but thta is not the point i was making, im saying that if you like your result you belive it and think that the test is acurate but if you do not like it you think the test is a load of BS, this is not about how acurate it really is, it is about how peoples oppinion on its acuracy varies depending on their result, regardless of weather it is REALLY ACURATE (well obviously not completly regardless)Originally posted by MindOverMatter
No test is 100% accurate, but I disagree with you. I've given this test to almost all of my friends, exes, and my current girl. I know these people's personalities like the back of the hand, and in many cases I was able to predict what result they would get.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
It's nothing like newspaper horoscopes, they aren't nearly as vague. Spend the time to actually take the test and then your feedback would be accurate and not a bunch of assumptions.Originally posted by sfalexi
An internet test like this is NEVER going to be 100% accurate. THere's no way you can lump all the guys that take it (probably hundreds of thousands so far) into 16 categories or however many there are.
But they shoot for vague generalizations and hope that what you've described fits into those generalizations, or that you interpret some of your life in such a way to fit the description AFTER hearing the description.
Much like the newspaper's horoscopes.
Alexi
The nice guy in me wants to say, "While you may disagree, there's no reason to imply that I'm a moron and haven't taken the test."It's nothing like newspaper horoscopes, they aren't nearly as vague. Spend the time to actually take the test and then your feedback would be accurate and not a bunch of assumptions.
Well, the test results do reflect the person taking it and their personality. Alright, yours was vague.Originally posted by sfalexi
But I think the A-hole in me is gonna win out on this one, and so I say **** you, you're wrong, I'm right. They're vague.
Alexi
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Same here. Apparently women find me horribly unattractive, which would explain why two of them picked up on ME yesterday. What an astoundingly accurate site.Originally posted by Bonhomme
Random Brutal Sex Dreamer
LOL!
I really think it's that I answered the questionnaire honestly. And I always thought I was too nice.
Hahaha for real though, I got that random brutal sex dreamer too.Originally posted by Luscious
Same here. Apparently women find me horribly unattractive, which would explain why two of them picked up on ME yesterday. What an astoundingly accurate site.![]()
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.