Coed swipes past 30K profiles to get 5 dates

[MatureDJ]

From our friends who have internalized the fact that "it's over" for them:

Tinder Thot chooses five men to date out of 30,000 (Xpost from braincels) | Incels.co - Involuntary Celibate

It’s over. 88% of men were rejected on sight, and of the pool of Chads and normies who matched only 2 went on more than one date with this tinder foid. JFL forget the 80/20 rule, the 88/12 rule is in full effect in 2019. There’s only a .0067% chance of getting a relationship off of Tinder...

incels.co

 

[corrector]

From our friends who have internalized the fact that "it's over" for them:

Tinder Thot chooses five men to date out of 30,000 (Xpost from braincels) | Incels.co - Involuntary Celibate

It’s over. 88% of men were rejected on sight, and of the pool of Chads and normies who matched only 2 went on more than one date with this tinder foid. JFL forget the 80/20 rule, the 88/12 rule is in full effect in 2019. There’s only a .0067% chance of getting a relationship off of Tinder...

incels.co

You are going on incel site boards and posting threads from there on this site for discussion?

 

[MatureDJ]

You are going on incel site boards and posting threads from there on this site for discussion?

Yes, when the thread has relevance. I would tend to think that Tinder stories fit in this forum; the fact that I got it from the Incels is irrelevant.

 

[Mike32ct]

0.0167 percent are good odds in 2019 lol.

All kidding aside, in a weird way, blackpill gives me optimism (and encouragement) by lowering my expectations to negligible levels.

 

[sosousage]

From our friends who have internalized the fact that "it's over" for them:

Tinder Thot chooses five men to date out of 30,000 (Xpost from braincels) | Incels.co - Involuntary Celibate

It’s over. 88% of men were rejected on sight, and of the pool of Chads and normies who matched only 2 went on more than one date with this tinder foid. JFL forget the 80/20 rule, the 88/12 rule is in full effect in 2019. There’s only a .0067% chance of getting a relationship off of Tinder...

incels.co

you have account on incels.co?

 

[Who Dares Win]

You are going on incel site boards and posting threads from there on this site for discussion?

The source of a fact or an information is not relevant as long as the information holds ground.

The only people bashing the source cause they dont like the message its usually leftists who dislike stats hidden from mainstream media and published from minor ones.

The average guy nowdays doesnt get laid, which basically makes him an incel wheter he accepts that label or not.

 

[MatureDJ]

you have account on incels.co?

One doesn't need an account to lurk there.

 

[GrowingPains]

Those who complain the most are the ones that get the worst results. That could be from lack of trying, refusing to change and alter their own strategies for successful results and also those people who sit on their hands and take the magic pill to get a result that takes work and effort.

I also find that a positive attitude is the first self controlled characteristic that unsuccessful people in life severely lack.

Another GG quote that transcends the original thread it was posted in.

^ This is how I feel about incels.

Life sucks sometimes. There is imbalance. This is nothing new, and it's not going to change. And there are plenty of extreme and less extreme examples in society that people can find to support their sad narratives. So what... Make a change or get what you've always gotten.

Wah wah wah. Incels piss me off.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

In china you can get a discount on health insurance if you walk a certain amount per day.

You have to verify that you walk by putting an app on your phone that counts your daily steps.

Naturally, some guy created a machine that simulates walking, so people can fake it.

It would seem easy enough to augment that machine to auto-swipe on qualified targets.

The whole thing could be automated, and you'd only be alerted when somebody swiped back.

I honestly don't see what the problem is.

Dating is a numbers game, is it not?

So a lady figures out how to play the numbers game more effectively, and everybody gets bent out of shape.

What's the interest of this article?

The actual numbers?

The ratio?

That it took a woman a while to find a match?

That she rejected so many guys?

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

I didn't realize what a problem this was....

 

[Mike32ct]

Whether it’s automated or manual, she only went on dates with 99.983 percentile guys.

Obviously that’s her choice. More power to her.

But the lesson for your typical Tinder user guy is...

(Too obvious to say)

 

[Who Dares Win]

Whether it’s automated or manual, she only went on dates with 99.983 percentile guys.

Obviously that’s her choice. More power to her.

But the lesson for your typical Tinder user guy is...

(Too obvious to say)

Wait what? They said that we need more game and all will be ours, no matter how you look or whats your job and status the almighty game will do.

 

[Mike32ct]

Wait what? They said that we need more game and all will be ours, no matter how you look or whats your job and status the almighty game will do.

I’m still trying to get my c&f to an Olympic >99.99 percentile level.

 

[MatureDJ]

I didn't realize what a problem this was....

I can only imagine how over it is for FIVETHREEBALDCEL.

 

[corrector]

Yes, when the thread has relevance. I would tend to think that Tinder stories fit in this forum; the fact that I got it from the Incels is irrelevant.

Why should I care of one girl on Tinder does with her profile? Do you expect her to go out with 30,000 guys? Even if she selected
100 guys that's still 29,900 she rejected? Would that make anyone feel better? What about this type of information is new that we haven't already heard before?