backseatjuan
Banned
Last edited:
Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
Whats wrong with nazis? A lot of them were good people. Nazi germany was a good place to live for many people.
Do you really think that Jews were kicked out of so many European countries so many times over the course of 100s of years for no reason at all? Even the Bolshevik revolution was master minded by the Jews. Every where you go in the US Jews are doing well because they only help each other. Israel is the only country that is allowes to practise enthno nationalism, every white country is having multiculturalism stuffed down is throat and in some cases Jews are behind it.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8ERmOpZrKtw&ved=0ahUKEwja6vuLuePdAhUJ0lMKHUdMC5oQo7QBCCswAw&usg=AOvVaw3VGtYUdlB3teV67c_oGz-_[/Q
The ussr was much worse. Besides, those who win the wars write the history. It's litterally illegal in 13 countries to publicly question even a small detail about the holocaust, as I always say I don't think nothing happened but I'm not quite sure what did.
It's hard to argue with.. Israel us an Extremely racist nation!The ussr was much worse. Besides, those who win the wars write the history. It's litterally illegal in 13 countries to publicly question even a small detail about the holocaust, as I always say I don't think nothing happened but I'm not quite sure what did.
Jews only look out for other jews. The Jewish mafia was more notorious than the Italian mafia, yet you don't hear about it. I don't think there was gas chambers and I don't think there was orders given to commit genocide. I think that is hard to know the truth because you can't even question the "official" truth.
I believe there were camps, just like the camps Americans put the Japanese in. I think that typhus caused many of those jews to look like they're starving, and i think Americans cut off the supply lines to those camps. Why were there so many survivors? Look how many people have been caught lying about it. There wasn't even a gas chamber in existence when Americans found auschwitz.
I wasn't there so I don't know what happened. But there is no way jews kept getting expelled from countries over and over again for no reason. They are taught by their religion to view gentiles as animals created to be used by them.
It's ok to hate white people, but if you dislike jews your an evil nazi bigot. Even many of the radical feminists were Jewish. Many liberals/democrats are Jewish.
@Spaz
Well, the US/NATO gave Iraq those chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq conflict. We also trained the Mujahideen and armed them- later which would become Al-Qaeda and eventually ISIS got a hold of that gear. Then we turn our backs on Iran and laugh it off with Saudi Arabia. The US/NATO has always intervened with the middle east for no apparent reason, other than financial gain of course.
If you look at what happened at 9/11, it doesn't make sense to overthrows Iraq's government because of a single terrorist group. Especially since we armed Iraq during the Iran-Iraq conflict.
The US/NATO has a history of arming a nation and then going back and destroying it.
Ukraine is a very poor country.
The Russian-Ukraine conflict was a past agreement violation. Ukraine has always been in the middle of EU and Russian political conflicts. Russia really didn't "invade" Ukraine, they more so intervened because the government was overthrown from protesters. One of the major factors for people demanding that the new prime minister/president resign was because he didn't sign a treaty with EU allowing for trade.
The reason why he didn't sign is because of a past deal with Russia. Russia didn't want that bill to pass because products from EU would get into Russia without tariffs because Russia and Ukraine essentially have free trade at this point.
The only part of Ukraine that Russia invaded was Crimea. Crimea has been a target for re-control ever since their first defeat in the mid 1800's. I wouldn't really call it in invasion since they kind of just showed up and Crimea kind of just gave them power.
There was very little resistance if any at all. I'm pretty sure there was only 6 confirmed deaths, 3 protesters and 3 soldiers. There were far more deaths from the protesters trying to overthrow their own Ukrainian government.
Iraq was given billions in aid via 3rd party weaponry but never directly by the US.@Spaz
Well, the US/NATO gave Iraq those chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq conflict. We also trained the Mujahideen and armed them- later which would become Al-Qaeda and eventually ISIS got a hold of that gear. Then we turn our backs on Iran and laugh it off with Saudi Arabia. The US/NATO has always intervened with the middle east for no apparent reason, other than financial gain of course.
If you look at what happened at 9/11, it doesn't make sense to overthrows Iraq's government because of a single terrorist group. Especially since we armed Iraq during the Iran-Iraq conflict.
The US/NATO has a history of arming a nation and then going back and destroying it.
Ukraine is a very poor country.
The Russian-Ukraine conflict was a past agreement violation. Ukraine has always been in the middle of EU and Russian political conflicts. Russia really didn't "invade" Ukraine, they more so intervened because the government was overthrown from protesters. One of the major factors for people demanding that the new prime minister/president resign was because he didn't sign a treaty with EU allowing for trade.
The reason why he didn't sign is because of a past deal with Russia. Russia didn't want that bill to pass because products from EU would get into Russia without tariffs because Russia and Ukraine essentially have free trade at this point.
The only part of Ukraine that Russia invaded was Crimea. Crimea has been a target for re-control ever since their first defeat in the mid 1800's. I wouldn't really call it in invasion since they kind of just showed up and Crimea kind of just gave them power.
There was very little resistance if any at all. I'm pretty sure there was only 6 confirmed deaths, 3 protesters and 3 soldiers. There were far more deaths from the protesters trying to overthrow their own Ukrainian government.
Calm down.Those who claim Russia invaded Ukraine for absolutely no reason, need to unplug themselves from the mainstream media narrative and do some research.. Follow the logic and you can come to your own conclusion.
Talking about Nazis.. It's funny how people like Bible_belt have now become the modern day FACISTS and NAZIS
Here we are, on a public forum, discussing a serious matter, and we all hold different views..
Yet if we disagree with Bible_belt narrative, and the Russian narrative makes more sense, then we should be SILENCED and BANNED from this forum.
Does that sound like how Democracy works?
I have reached my opinions based on doing my own research and not simply just taking sides!
Who is the real facist? The person who wants to oppress others for having a different opinion.. The likes of Bible_belt who want to accuse others of being spies, simply because they came to a different conclusion.
Bible_belt wants people banned, because they express there right to FREE speech.
This is Facism right here guys!
This is where your LOGIC falls apart..Iraq was given billions in aid via 3rd party weaponry but never directly by the US.
Yes, Reagan fvcked it up bcoz of the hostage crisis by Iranian backed terrorists and if memory serves me right he got Israel involved to supply Iran weapons in the hope of securing those hostages.
Soviets were naturally alarmed with Islamist being installed into power in Iran. When the Iranians looked likely to win the war, the soviets were the 1st to arm Iraq.
It was for geopolitical reasons, they had at that time Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and a few other regions with major Muslim populations. There was real fear that what happened in Iran will be exported out to their own borders.
The Saudis too became alarmed at the sudden rise of Islamist in Iran and feared a similar fate, they took on a more "pure" form of Islam - that gave rise to Osama and ISIS.
Although US credibility was damage by getting Israel to arm Iran, there's some sympathy as they were blackmailed into doing so.
But they didn't supply chemical weapons, those are "poor man" bombs and those recipes has been floating around since WW 1.
Someone gassed those Syrians, doesn't matter where our political leanings are, killing babies is something everyone should be able stand up too and it's highly probable that Assad did it.
On the ground, only he has the power and means to launch it there.
And Russians were right there supporting him with troops, weapons, intelligence etc.
But to be fair, I think the Russians were innocent in the gassings, and rightly embarrassed by it.
Assad gains plenty for gassing his people.This
This is where your LOGIC falls apart..
You say it is likely Assad did it.. infact it is highly UNLIKELY Assad did it.
Use your common sense.. Assad gains NOTHING from gassing kids.. other than getting bombed into the stone age, by the Western powers!
He has already won.. And taken most of his country back.. He gains naff all from using chemical weapons..
Am I really going to believe the Western narrative? These are the SAME people who told us, Saddam had weapons of MASS destruction, and can wipe us all out in 15mins!
Proven to be LIARS.. You want us now to believe these same Liars. Lol
The 1st reported use of chemical attacks was in 2013.He already had the rebels defeated. Why not use gas before then?
Where is the proof that he did gas those people?
If my History book, and online articles are accurate, it was the US/NATO whom supplied the MOST weapons to Iraq during that conflict.Iraq was given billions in aid via 3rd party weaponry but never directly by the US.
Yes, Reagan fvcked it up bcoz of the hostage crisis by Iranian backed terrorists and if memory serves me right he got Israel involved to supply Iran weapons in the hope of securing those hostages.
Soviets were naturally alarmed with Islamist being installed into power in Iran. When the Iranians looked likely to win the war, the soviets were the 1st to arm Iraq.
It was for geopolitical reasons, they had at that time Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and a few other regions with major Muslim populations. There was real fear that what happened in Iran will be exported out to their own borders.
The Saudis too became alarmed at the sudden rise of Islamist in Iran and feared a similar fate, they took on a more "pure" form of Islam - that gave rise to Osama and ISIS.
Although US credibility was damage by getting Israel to arm Iran, there's some sympathy as they were blackmailed into doing so.
But they didn't supply chemical weapons, those are "poor man" bombs and those recipes has been floating around since WW 1.
Someone gassed those Syrians, doesn't matter where our political leanings are, killing babies is something everyone should be able stand up too and it's highly probable that Assad did it.
On the ground, only he has the power and means to launch it there.
And Russians were right there supporting him with troops, weapons, intelligence etc.
But to be fair, I think the Russians were innocent in the gassings, and rightly embarrassed by it.
Source for the first reported chemical attacks?
And none of this is proof of anything. Did you get this information from Diane Feinstein and Dr Ford?
Not from western news and not from Russian news. Both fake news.
I got it from Asia news, no lies there.
Ur logic is biased thus it is flawed.
2013 was the 1st chemical attack.
Even the Russians acknowledged it and asked Assad to stop it. At that time Assad was losing not winning.
Now, how about you use some logic and deduce from there.
Oh yeah, he's winning it in 2018, 5 years after the 1st chemical bombs and with Russian and Iranian military help.
I could ask the same of you. Will it be forthcoming or just more of the vitriol that's commonly spewed by Russian paid internet trolls?Again I ask for the source of the 1st chemical attack narrative you are propagating. Will it be forthcoming?