Classy Girl vs. Sex Pot

[toddlips]

oh you mean a retired sex pot??? lol.. well women are staying in the game up into their 40s now so you may need to find a nice polite 60 year old since most other women are still sexpots

I'm not sure I understand your point.

 

[Ronnie Poleman]

Sex pot for short-term...classy chick for long term, if you had to choose one or the other. But like others have said, why not a classy chick who is also a sex pot? If Don Juans can be classy gentlemen whilst being good with the ladies and smooth in bed, surely there will be a few women who are diamonds in the rough and are all-round good human beings too? They will be hard to find, like all good things, but worth it.

 

[toddlips]

Sex pot for short-term...classy chick for long term, if you had to choose one or the other. But like others have said, why not a classy chick who is also a sex pot? If Don Juans can be classy gentlemen whilst being good with the ladies and smooth in bed, surely there will be a few women who are diamonds in the rough and are all-round good human beings too? They will be hard to find, like all good things, but worth it.

But sometimes what makes a chick a sex pot is the fact that she is entirely NOT classy, you know?

 

[bud_2005]

I'm suprised by some of your answers the majority of the answers say classy. If you want a classy girl then why are the sex pots always being pursued whilte the some classy girls have never been kissed.

 

[Ixnys]

Classy on the outside and sexy but any girl who is into you and who you are really into as well should be open to wanting to do everything sexually with you.

 

[OTB]

Oh my God.....

You guys have GOT to be Fvcking kidding ME!

I was reading this whole thread, and I just couldn't dare NOT to post a reply......

All I get from reading this thread is that every single poster on here has the exact same fvcking opinion on the subject!

You guys do not do any justice whatsoever to the word "MEN", let alone the proper title of an accomplished "Don Juan"
( since real men hold deep convictions about their various often opposing points of view, most of the posters on this thread seem to display characteristics of a certain sociological phenomenon known as "sheeple" )

Although I'm sure that many of you here have gotten laid at least one time in your lives, you are still Beta Males for one reason:
That reason is that many of you still do not have the balls to break free from viscous grip of society's expectations. You must all throw away your fake social masks and release your ancient animalistic, masculine tendenies that have remained dormant in both your body and mind for numerous centuries.
Only once you have done this, will have have the right to call your self a "True Alpha Male" :box:

I am utterly surprised that after spending such long, extensive periods of time on this site,
many of you still have not broken free from The Matrix


The reason I sound so worked up right now is that throughout 2 whole pages of responses I see only one answer to the two-choice question......

The typical answer lies along the lines of something like:
"Sweet, classy girl for me! "

And although I personally do not have anything against a so-called "classy girl", it is ridiculous to believe that every poster who has so far replied would immedietly disregard the sexpot as a potential partner when it truly came down between the two.

I am actually a 100% certain that when it came down to crunch time, many of you on here would drop the pretenious "classy girl forever" attitude immedietly and take the sexpot in a quick heartbeat!

The so-called sexpot is wayyyy more appealing to man's primal instincts than the socially acceptable classy girl :yes:



And to all of my Don Juan brethern who find themselves angry at reading this,

this post is NOT intended to troll the thread & cause more flame wars.......
My reason for pointing this out is to call on the readers to look a little deeper inside themselves
(specifically, into their now rarely-used masculine mindset in order to open their eyes on what they truly to want obtain on the journey of life)

In my opinion the complete comformity of opinion on this subject matter is a pathetic example of the success of societal conditioning on "free-thinking man" and completely goes against the original ideals of the great man aftert which this site site is named!

Hope this enlightens you guys!
But if it doesn't, you guys are hopeless & utter FAILS! :crackup:

 

[OTB]

And to further clarify on the definition of a "Sexpot":

This one is always been tough for me to decide on. An attractive, classy girl who will represent you well when you are together versus the super-hot girl who oozes sexuality. I've been with both for the most part and it doesn't make this any easier to decide on.

Perhaps this is better communicated with an example using celebs. Would you rather be with a girl like Natalie Portman, who is classy and smart, or Jessica Alba or Jessica Biel - women who just run wild with sexual vibes?

To tell you the honest truth neither of the two women mentioned above strike me as "women who just run wild with sexual vibes"

As a matter of fact, Jessica Alba looks quite wholesome to me!

When I think of the word "sexpot" totally different women come to mind,
Women that are better suited for this label are:
Jenna Jameson, Pamela Anderson, Carmen Electra & Jamie Pressley

(And what the fvck is with the media always giving Angelina Jolie the title of "Sexiest Woman Ever"
Don't get me wrong, she is truly beautiful but she's still way too sophisticated for the label of "Sexpot" to be put upon her...)




Oh, and props to realsmoothie for coming to the same realization a bit earlier on in this thread

Neither Jessica (Biel or Alba) strikes me as "sex pot".

Yeah, they are "hot", but they both seem a little too together, too cleaned up. Especially Alba, she looks like she'd be terrible in bed.

 

[Tekniq]

Although I'm sure that many of you here have gotten laid at least one time in your lives, you are still Beta Males for one reason:

Well you are still a virgin.

For those of us that are not, there is a reason that everyone here has a similar opinion. We know what a long term positive relationship requires. Be it long distance or seeing the young lady every day.

 

[SoldMySoul]

This one is always been tough for me to decide on. An attractive, classy girl who will represent you well when you are together versus the super-hot girl who oozes sexuality. I've been with both for the most part and it doesn't make this any easier to decide on.

Perhaps this is better communicated with an example using celebs. Would you rather be with a girl like Natalie Portman, who is classy and smart, or Jessica Alba or Jessica Biel - women who just run wild with sexual vibes?

Easy for me to answer! Always, and I do mean always I prefer the classy woman. I would much rather see a woman in business attire/ skirt with nice shoes and thigh highs as compared to jeans. It has always been a major turn on for me. I like a well kept woman.

 

[Darth]

Easy for me to answer! Always, and I do mean always I prefer the classy woman. I would much rather see a woman in business attire/ skirt with nice shoes and thigh highs as compared to jeans. It has always been a major turn on for me. I like a well kept woman.

Me too. Nothing turns me off more than a woman who looks like she just rolled out of bed, or ripped jeans with her butt hanging out.

It's basically the difference between this: http://a284.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/63/m_cd080d23b47c87f1240cab1df9602e6b.jpg

and this:

http://blogs.singlemindedwomen.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/bachelorette.jpg

One looks like a woman, one is not.

 

[SoldMySoul]

Me too. Nothing turns me off more than a woman who looks like she just rolled out of bed, or ripped jeans with her butt hanging out.

It's basically the difference between this: http://a284.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/63/m_cd080d23b47c87f1240cab1df9602e6b.jpg

and this:

http://blogs.singlemindedwomen.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/bachelorette.jpg

One looks like a woman, one is not.

Not a real good example, IMO. It is hard to tell a difference in these two because the shots you are using is upper torso and face mainly. If the younger had slouchy ass jeans on then I may agree. Both of these women are attractive to me and it has a lot to do with me liking dark hair.

I still think we are same page though. Long live the classy women who does not come across like a garbage tramp!

 

[Darth]

OK, here's a better comparison:

http://familiarface.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/grace-kelly.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ABC9hoeuL._SS400_.jpg

 

[SoldMySoul]

OK, here's a better comparison:

http://familiarface.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/grace-kelly.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ABC9hoeuL._SS400_.jpg

Nope and I will tell you why!!! Because that is one hot ass looking blonde wearing behind closed doors sexy lingerie! I am referring to daily wear. If the lingerie wearing one wore this in public it would raise a public concern.

I am talking about the ones that wear jeans with thong showing along with flip flops. try again!!!

 

[OTB]

Fvck You Tekniq! ​

Why the fvck would you just start sh!t over the internet with one of your closest friends?!?!?! :box:

God Damn! Show some fvckin' Respect! :trouble:

If it wasn't for me you wouldn't have even known that this amazing site even existed!

Matter of fact, you wouldn't have even known ANYTHING about Game or Pickup Artistry!

So you better be fvckin' grateful to me for opening up your eyes to the world!

So basically, without me enlightening you.... You would still be delving in the deep, dark abyss of One-itus & AFCdom

So in sumary, remember your fvcking roots next time you try to seem like cool over the internet in front of a bunch of people you've never met in your life!

 

[OTB]

Oh, and all these smart-ass comments are coming from a kid that told me something along these lines several weeks ago:


"Yo, I'm probably not gonna go on SoSuave anymore. I just don't need it. I'm way beyond it."


And yet, you still post some useless, uncontructive one-line posts every single fvckin' day!

Tekniq ----> Just take your caustic, pretentious attitude to some other internet forum :trouble: :trouble: :trouble: :trouble: :trouble:

Like TranceAddict! :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

 

[Darth]

All right, fine. I'll make it OBVIOUS

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c196/syringa17/BeautifulIngridBergman.jpg

http://www.emo-styles.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/emo-girl.jpg

One is a classy, beautiful woman...and one is not.

 

[OTB]

OK, here's a better comparison:

http://familiarface.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/grace-kelly.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ABC9hoeuL._SS400_.jpg

Actually Darth, that's the perfect comparison of what we're talking about here!

Mad props to you for finding these pictures which correctly show the two completely opposite kinds of women!


But this empirical evidence just further proves my point! :yes:

Who in their right mind WOULDN'T pick the blonde bombshell over the sexy granny from the 1950s?!

 

[OTB]

All right, fine. I'll make it OBVIOUS

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c196/syringa17/BeautifulIngridBergman.jpg

http://www.emo-styles.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/emo-girl.jpg

One is a classy, beautiful woman...and one is not.

I think I liked your previous comparison just a bit better!


It was wayyyyy less BIASED! :crackup: :crackup: :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

 

[SoldMySoul]

All right, fine. I'll make it OBVIOUS

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c196/syringa17/BeautifulIngridBergman.jpg

http://www.emo-styles.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/emo-girl.jpg

One is a classy, beautiful woman...and one is not.

Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!

Yep that is the difference.

 

[toddlips]

I'm not sure any of those examples are quite what I had in mind. I agree that a true sex-pot is more of a Pamela Anderson type and the classy type is Natalie Portman.

OTB - your opinion is valued. - Even if you overuse the "bold" feature.