"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

A DJ Theory: Mathematically Proven! (now with calculator)

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

Don Ronny

Banned
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
813
Reaction score
5
Originally posted by Giovanni Casanova
It is an absolute wonder that anyone on this board ever gets laid.
So, you are saying the equations dont work! :(
 

Yotsuya-san

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
393
Reaction score
1
Location
Maison Ikokku
Let's just give this equation to Deep Thought and if the past is indicitave of anything, we might find out the answer in about seven and a half million years.

"We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
Vroomfondel
 

Yotsuya-san

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
393
Reaction score
1
Location
Maison Ikokku
Let's just give this equation to Deep Thought and if the past is indicitave of anything, we might find out the answer in about seven and a half million years.

Now that I think of it...Planet I heard of called called....Logopolis. They can create the perfect chick using block transfer computation. Don't know if they got over that bit with the Master, though.

"We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
Vroomfondel
 

"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"

Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."

You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.

She's been waiting forty minutes.

Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.

Read more...

TooColdUlrick

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
989
Reaction score
9
Location
Hollywood
dude, your math is sloppy.

you forgot about the quasi-convexity conditions; the second order conditions for local maxima/minima; and the non-linear time constraints. drop the logs and move it over to continuous-time stochastics. i think we'd better understand the inverse relationship between time spent and IL.

if you would have applied the neo-classical Von Neumann/Morgenstern risk axioms in the matrix algebra framework, you would be on the right track.

i have already completed this proof whilst i was whacking off last night.

i am now working on the Nash Bargaining Solution, applied to getting easy pvssy.

but i can't seem to get the continuous-time stochastics straight. any thoughts? i'm looking to get it published in the Journal of the American Frustrated Chump.

otherwise, your proof is perfect. kudos.

you must be an economist.

it's posts like these that keep me comin' back!!! i think he was actually serious. what a crack up.

hey moderators---MAKE THIS A STICKY!!!
 
Last edited:

Eternal

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Messages
5,511
Reaction score
10
Originally posted by TooColdUlrick
hey moderators---MAKE THIS A STICKY!!!
Nah, we're good...
 

karusel

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
98
Reaction score
1
Age
47
Sometimes you can prove what you want to prove without that actually being true. Relationships can't be explained by math, there are just much too many variables that you neglect in your calculations.
 

Alexis Zorba

Don Juan
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Age
41
Location
Mexico
Hey...

Come on guys give the man a friggin break? Can't anyone like math? Just as some of you may like sports, reading, writing, there are people who absolutely love math. They do math just for fun. Don't attack him just because you can't see the fun in doing Calculus (hey I can't either. what a shame...:rolleyes: ).

It is an absolute wonder that anyone on this board ever gets laid.
-Looking at my hairy palm-: What was that again?:D




You guys are taking this way to seriously. Way more seriously than I have, and I actually took the time to understand the math.
Amen to that.

Alexis Zorba
 

"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.

For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.

Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.

The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.

Read more...

comic_relief

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
49
Location
Baltimore, MD
the moderators are pretty dam funny.

I love the humor in this post.
 

true|hockey

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 5, 2003
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by karusel
Sometimes you can prove what you want to prove without that actually being true. Relationships can't be explained by math, there are just much too many variables that you neglect in your calculations.
Non-Cooperative Game theory maybe, which is used in economics. The idea is to analyze choice rather than variables, it won john nash a nobel prize in the 90's. It is actually very applicable in social instances, especially with coopertive (wingman and the like) and non coopertive situations (a bunch of chumps ruining it for you).

I for one am scared to think that these things are actually modeled mathematically.
 

icepick

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
650
Reaction score
3
Ah, I have been ruminating about your theory here, and I realize now, after isolating the specific points of antipathy between my intrinsic experiental extrapolations and the supposed implications of your espousal using a holistic overview, what is needed to reconcile your formulas to empirical datum.

First, the parabolic. Then keep in mind Ulricks post. Although, Ulrick, I think that using the neo-classical Von Neumann/Morgenstern risk axioms, in this situation, is a bit simplistic.

Don't you think?

Look at Dirac's postulate of non-communicativitiness. That seems to keep the divergencess at the singularities down to a nugatory level.

Applied to the 4-th dimensional multiplicital-derivative (that is e to the integral of the log of the function from a to b, divided by b minus a), this conjecture seems to imply a double convexity of the topological hull of the projected data, sufficient to converge the 2nd order derivatives to unity, while refracting the 3rd orders at these points to infinity. (Which is what all girls want! Duh!)

So, using your modulated theory, I ran a simulation on my associates supercomputer, and we came up with the constant for women:

W=01010011011010110110010101100101011101000010110000100000011100110110101101100101011001010111010000101100001000000111001101101011011001010110010101110100001011000010000001110011011010110110010101100101011101000010110000100000011100110110101101100101011001010111010000100001

Pardon the binary, but since man and women can be viewed as positive and negative entities interacting in a discontinuous, yet paridoxically enclosed environment, we felt it was justified.
 

rgeere

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 25, 2003
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1
Location
Fort Worth, Texas
Originally posted by icepick

So, using your modulated theory, I ran a simulation on my associates supercomputer, and we came up with the constant for women:

W=01010011011010110110010101100101011101000010110000100000011100110110101101100101011001010111010000101100001000000111001101101011011001010110010101110100001011000010000001110011011010110110010101100101011101000010110000100000011100110110101101100101011001010111010000100001

Pardon the binary, but since man and women can be viewed as positive and negative entities interacting in a discontinuous, yet paridoxically enclosed environment, we felt it was justified.

May thou continually drool within the presence of faded 90's era claudia shiffard pics and posters, my liege. Thou art a father to all who seek thy divine presence ohh great digerati. Thou mayest live long and prosper, and napster forevermore.
 

"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"

You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.

Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.

Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.

Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.

Read more...

rgeere

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 25, 2003
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1
Location
Fort Worth, Texas
Originally posted by icepick

W=01010011011010110110010101100101011101000010110000100000011100110110101101100101011001010111010000101100001000000111001101101011011001010110010101110100001011000010000001110011011010110110010101100101011101000010110000100000011100110110101101100101011001010111010000100001
On a serious note a real computer geek would not fall for this being binary. Binary doesn't look like this.
 

So pimp its scary

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Messages
1,677
Reaction score
3
Age
44
Location
In the C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh!
Woman = Evil

I found an equation of my own...

First, we all know that women take time and money.

Woman = Time * Money

The cliche says, 'time is money'

Time = Money

Therefore,

Woman = Money * Money = Money^2 (Or squared)

And because money is the root of all evil

Money = Sqrt(Evil)

Therefore,

Woman = (Sqrt(Evil))^2

And we are forced to conclude that

Woman = Evil

However, because we make the root squared we must give the absolute value

Woman = |evil|

Or Woman = Absolute Evil

Beat that b!tch!! *snaps fingers aggressively*
 

rgeere

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 25, 2003
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
1
Location
Fort Worth, Texas
Re: Woman = Evil

Originally posted by So pimp its scary
I found an equation of my own...

First, we all know that women take time and money.

Woman = Time * Money

The cliche says, 'time is money'

Time = Money

Therefore,

Woman = Money * Money = Money^2 (Or squared)

And because money is the root of all evil

Money = Sqrt(Evil)

Therefore,

Woman = (Sqrt(Evil))^2

And we are forced to conclude that

Woman = Evil

However, because we make the root squared we must give the absolute value

Woman = |evil|

Or Woman = Absolute Evil

Beat that b!tch!! *snaps fingers aggressively*
That's old, someone had put a picture of a paper with that written on it as a wallpaper on one of the computers in a lab here at my university a few months ago.
 

Evil-Rom

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 27, 2003
Messages
858
Reaction score
0
Age
39
Location
,-._|\ ................... ............ / Aus \ ..
0.999... = 1.
 

So pimp its scary

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Messages
1,677
Reaction score
3
Age
44
Location
In the C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh!
Re: Re: Woman = Evil

Originally posted by rgeere
That's old, someone had put a picture of a paper with that written on it as a wallpaper on one of the computers in a lab here at my university a few months ago.
I know its old... it's kinda lame also.
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

Top