Article below
-----------------------------
Women are Not Capable of Love
For the longest time, we have been told that women are more emotional in relationships. While this is true, it has blinded us to another truth— one that many women like to dismiss because it exposes them for the fraud that they truly are. I use the word “fraud” because women have managed to trick the world into believing they’re the best at something they are not even capable of.
While this appears to be an attack on women, I think it is important that I stress that the goal of this article is to establish an understanding that men love women far more differently than women love men. Hence, men love women idealistically, while women tend to love men more from an opportunistic stand point.
When a woman falls in love with a man, she’s most likely doing so because the man is valuable to her. In other words, in a woman’s world, unconditional love for a man is nonexistent. Emphasising this in one of his shows, Chris rock said “the man is loved only on the condition that he provides or gives something.” This suggests that if a man isn’t offering “something” or is projected to be unable to offer it in the nearest future, he’s unworthy of love. Interestingly, “something” in this context refers to whatever the woman values. This raises the question: what do women value?? With MONEY being the most common answer, it comes as no surprise that many women today openly declare that they can’t date broke men. This implies that as a man, absence of funds typically equals absence of love and affection for you.
Apart from money, there are those who value LOOKS, INTELLIGENCE, SECURITY and finally, ATTENTION. So therefore, every man who desires to be loved must have the capacity to provide any one or a combination of all of these things in the present or the nearest future (cos if the future too far, them go shenk you). With this, it’s safe to assert that love is a transaction for every woman.
With transactional love masquerading as true love, it’s no coincidence that the divorce and breakup rate for men who lose their jobs or earning power is significantly higher. According to one Havard study that analysed data from 6,300 couples, married men with no jobs were more likely to get divorced than those with secure jobs. The study went further to emphasise that men with less stable income or part-time jobs experience greater marital strife, and their conjugal life is far from sweet. More recently, Keldenich and Luecke (2020) in attempts to establish links between a husband’s job loss and marital stability found a 74% increased chance of marriage dissolution when the man loses his source of income. These empirical evidences support my earlier claim that unconditional love is nonexistent in a woman’s world. This is also the reason many women keep different men to satisfy their various needs. They identify quickly who has what they want, and transact their time, and quite often their bodies in exchange for these wants.
Explaining why women may be transactional in love, evolutionary psychology argues that individuals with desirable traits are more likely to attract a mate and reproduce. In this context, men often offer resources and support to women in exchange for sexual access, which can help them demonstrate their abilities to provide for a potential mate and their offspring. From a female perspective, choosing a partner who can offer resources and support may increase the chances of survival and reproductive success for her and her offspring. Similarly, comparative psychology argues that among many animal species, females often use selective mate choice to ensure that they mate only with high-quality males.
In humans, social and cultural factors also play a critical role in predicting how transactional women are with love, often posing strong influences on the degree to which women prioritise factors such as physical attractiveness, wealth, or status in a potential partner. These factors may be more or less important depending on the individual and the cultural context.
Ultimately, I think that boys and men must accept the unfortunate reality that they may never fully be loved for who they are. I, for one, have given up on finding true love.
------------------
Thoughts?
-----------------------------
Women are Not Capable of Love
For the longest time, we have been told that women are more emotional in relationships. While this is true, it has blinded us to another truth— one that many women like to dismiss because it exposes them for the fraud that they truly are. I use the word “fraud” because women have managed to trick the world into believing they’re the best at something they are not even capable of.
While this appears to be an attack on women, I think it is important that I stress that the goal of this article is to establish an understanding that men love women far more differently than women love men. Hence, men love women idealistically, while women tend to love men more from an opportunistic stand point.
When a woman falls in love with a man, she’s most likely doing so because the man is valuable to her. In other words, in a woman’s world, unconditional love for a man is nonexistent. Emphasising this in one of his shows, Chris rock said “the man is loved only on the condition that he provides or gives something.” This suggests that if a man isn’t offering “something” or is projected to be unable to offer it in the nearest future, he’s unworthy of love. Interestingly, “something” in this context refers to whatever the woman values. This raises the question: what do women value?? With MONEY being the most common answer, it comes as no surprise that many women today openly declare that they can’t date broke men. This implies that as a man, absence of funds typically equals absence of love and affection for you.
Apart from money, there are those who value LOOKS, INTELLIGENCE, SECURITY and finally, ATTENTION. So therefore, every man who desires to be loved must have the capacity to provide any one or a combination of all of these things in the present or the nearest future (cos if the future too far, them go shenk you). With this, it’s safe to assert that love is a transaction for every woman.
With transactional love masquerading as true love, it’s no coincidence that the divorce and breakup rate for men who lose their jobs or earning power is significantly higher. According to one Havard study that analysed data from 6,300 couples, married men with no jobs were more likely to get divorced than those with secure jobs. The study went further to emphasise that men with less stable income or part-time jobs experience greater marital strife, and their conjugal life is far from sweet. More recently, Keldenich and Luecke (2020) in attempts to establish links between a husband’s job loss and marital stability found a 74% increased chance of marriage dissolution when the man loses his source of income. These empirical evidences support my earlier claim that unconditional love is nonexistent in a woman’s world. This is also the reason many women keep different men to satisfy their various needs. They identify quickly who has what they want, and transact their time, and quite often their bodies in exchange for these wants.
Explaining why women may be transactional in love, evolutionary psychology argues that individuals with desirable traits are more likely to attract a mate and reproduce. In this context, men often offer resources and support to women in exchange for sexual access, which can help them demonstrate their abilities to provide for a potential mate and their offspring. From a female perspective, choosing a partner who can offer resources and support may increase the chances of survival and reproductive success for her and her offspring. Similarly, comparative psychology argues that among many animal species, females often use selective mate choice to ensure that they mate only with high-quality males.
In humans, social and cultural factors also play a critical role in predicting how transactional women are with love, often posing strong influences on the degree to which women prioritise factors such as physical attractiveness, wealth, or status in a potential partner. These factors may be more or less important depending on the individual and the cultural context.
Ultimately, I think that boys and men must accept the unfortunate reality that they may never fully be loved for who they are. I, for one, have given up on finding true love.
------------------
Thoughts?
