El Payaso
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
- Reaction score
- 2,624
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
________skinnyguy said:Here we go again with gender inequality
A fat ugly woman will get 50+ likes on her profile picture while a decent looking guy will get 12 likes max
If you don't like it, don't even worry about it. Just do yo thang
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?Jaylan said:Haven't they been dropping the hammer on female teachers lately? This case notwithstanding, the courts have seemed to start getting harsher on these women. At least with every other case I've seen this year.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...r-sexually-abusing-three-pupils-10368742.html
She got 22 years.
Nope, I agree with the 22 year sentence. I'm sick of women wanting it both ways. One minute, it's all about "women are equal to men" and thus they should get equal pay, not be discriminated based on gender, etc.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
Something is off, they are not telling the whole story.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
So , according to you , 45 years old teacher banging 12 years old Timmy is ok?piranha45 said:Punishing a reasonable-looking female for having sex with a male-- regardless of the male's age-- is silly.
Those of you advocating punishment for this woman are silly.
Thanks, that needed to be said.C-quenced said:These stories piss me off to no end. When I was 13 - 18 I didn't get ****. Certainly not from girls around my age and definitely not from my attractive teachers. Shortly after I leave high school these stories become more and more rampant and high school girls become sluttier. The overwhelming urge of wanting to bend some of my attractive female teachers (and female classmates) over a table and fvck the living daylights out of them is as strong and pronounced today as it was when I was 14 (I'm 30). This is bull****.
http://patch.com/new-jersey/parsipp...-physical-things-classroom-student-testifie-0
https://madbridge.com/another-new-jersey-teacher-busted-for-sex-with-students/#
http://www.frontpagebuzz.com/life/24-year-old-catholic-school-teacher-arrested-sex-student.html
Look through the above links and you'll realize that these are the same kind of ho's that the average guy would give his left nut over and hope to get something (sex or a relationship) out of it but at the same time some of these broads indiscriminately give it up to high schoolers.
The laws currently in place in the United States are a severe violation of Amendment VIII.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
I'm not defending the woman, I'm assailing the cowardly culture that believes a person of ANY AGE should be "traumatized" by sex.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
I agree here.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.