El Payaso
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
- Reaction score
- 2,624
She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.
You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.
The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
________skinnyguy said:Here we go again with gender inequality
A fat ugly woman will get 50+ likes on her profile picture while a decent looking guy will get 12 likes max
If you don't like it, don't even worry about it. Just do yo thang
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?Jaylan said:Haven't they been dropping the hammer on female teachers lately? This case notwithstanding, the courts have seemed to start getting harsher on these women. At least with every other case I've seen this year.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...r-sexually-abusing-three-pupils-10368742.html
She got 22 years.
Nope, I agree with the 22 year sentence. I'm sick of women wanting it both ways. One minute, it's all about "women are equal to men" and thus they should get equal pay, not be discriminated based on gender, etc.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
Something is off, they are not telling the whole story.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
So , according to you , 45 years old teacher banging 12 years old Timmy is ok?piranha45 said:Punishing a reasonable-looking female for having sex with a male-- regardless of the male's age-- is silly.
Those of you advocating punishment for this woman are silly.
Thanks, that needed to be said.C-quenced said:These stories piss me off to no end. When I was 13 - 18 I didn't get ****. Certainly not from girls around my age and definitely not from my attractive teachers. Shortly after I leave high school these stories become more and more rampant and high school girls become sluttier. The overwhelming urge of wanting to bend some of my attractive female teachers (and female classmates) over a table and fvck the living daylights out of them is as strong and pronounced today as it was when I was 14 (I'm 30). This is bull****.
http://patch.com/new-jersey/parsipp...-physical-things-classroom-student-testifie-0
https://madbridge.com/another-new-jersey-teacher-busted-for-sex-with-students/#
http://www.frontpagebuzz.com/life/24-year-old-catholic-school-teacher-arrested-sex-student.html
Look through the above links and you'll realize that these are the same kind of ho's that the average guy would give his left nut over and hope to get something (sex or a relationship) out of it but at the same time some of these broads indiscriminately give it up to high schoolers.
The laws currently in place in the United States are a severe violation of Amendment VIII.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
I'm not defending the woman, I'm assailing the cowardly culture that believes a person of ANY AGE should be "traumatized" by sex.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
I agree here.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.