El Payaso
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
- Reaction score
- 2,624
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
________skinnyguy said:Here we go again with gender inequality
A fat ugly woman will get 50+ likes on her profile picture while a decent looking guy will get 12 likes max
If you don't like it, don't even worry about it. Just do yo thang
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?Jaylan said:Haven't they been dropping the hammer on female teachers lately? This case notwithstanding, the courts have seemed to start getting harsher on these women. At least with every other case I've seen this year.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...r-sexually-abusing-three-pupils-10368742.html
She got 22 years.
Nope, I agree with the 22 year sentence. I'm sick of women wanting it both ways. One minute, it's all about "women are equal to men" and thus they should get equal pay, not be discriminated based on gender, etc.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
Something is off, they are not telling the whole story.
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
So , according to you , 45 years old teacher banging 12 years old Timmy is ok?piranha45 said:Punishing a reasonable-looking female for having sex with a male-- regardless of the male's age-- is silly.
Those of you advocating punishment for this woman are silly.
Thanks, that needed to be said.C-quenced said:These stories piss me off to no end. When I was 13 - 18 I didn't get ****. Certainly not from girls around my age and definitely not from my attractive teachers. Shortly after I leave high school these stories become more and more rampant and high school girls become sluttier. The overwhelming urge of wanting to bend some of my attractive female teachers (and female classmates) over a table and fvck the living daylights out of them is as strong and pronounced today as it was when I was 14 (I'm 30). This is bull****.
http://patch.com/new-jersey/parsipp...-physical-things-classroom-student-testifie-0
https://madbridge.com/another-new-jersey-teacher-busted-for-sex-with-students/#
http://www.frontpagebuzz.com/life/24-year-old-catholic-school-teacher-arrested-sex-student.html
Look through the above links and you'll realize that these are the same kind of ho's that the average guy would give his left nut over and hope to get something (sex or a relationship) out of it but at the same time some of these broads indiscriminately give it up to high schoolers.
The laws currently in place in the United States are a severe violation of Amendment VIII.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
I'm not defending the woman, I'm assailing the cowardly culture that believes a person of ANY AGE should be "traumatized" by sex.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
I agree here.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.