El Payaso
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
- Reaction score
- 2,624
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
________skinnyguy said:Here we go again with gender inequality
A fat ugly woman will get 50+ likes on her profile picture while a decent looking guy will get 12 likes max
If you don't like it, don't even worry about it. Just do yo thang
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?Jaylan said:Haven't they been dropping the hammer on female teachers lately? This case notwithstanding, the courts have seemed to start getting harsher on these women. At least with every other case I've seen this year.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...r-sexually-abusing-three-pupils-10368742.html
She got 22 years.
Nope, I agree with the 22 year sentence. I'm sick of women wanting it both ways. One minute, it's all about "women are equal to men" and thus they should get equal pay, not be discriminated based on gender, etc.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
Something is off, they are not telling the whole story.
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
So , according to you , 45 years old teacher banging 12 years old Timmy is ok?piranha45 said:Punishing a reasonable-looking female for having sex with a male-- regardless of the male's age-- is silly.
Those of you advocating punishment for this woman are silly.
Thanks, that needed to be said.C-quenced said:These stories piss me off to no end. When I was 13 - 18 I didn't get ****. Certainly not from girls around my age and definitely not from my attractive teachers. Shortly after I leave high school these stories become more and more rampant and high school girls become sluttier. The overwhelming urge of wanting to bend some of my attractive female teachers (and female classmates) over a table and fvck the living daylights out of them is as strong and pronounced today as it was when I was 14 (I'm 30). This is bull****.
http://patch.com/new-jersey/parsipp...-physical-things-classroom-student-testifie-0
https://madbridge.com/another-new-jersey-teacher-busted-for-sex-with-students/#
http://www.frontpagebuzz.com/life/24-year-old-catholic-school-teacher-arrested-sex-student.html
Look through the above links and you'll realize that these are the same kind of ho's that the average guy would give his left nut over and hope to get something (sex or a relationship) out of it but at the same time some of these broads indiscriminately give it up to high schoolers.
The laws currently in place in the United States are a severe violation of Amendment VIII.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
I'm not defending the woman, I'm assailing the cowardly culture that believes a person of ANY AGE should be "traumatized" by sex.Danger said:Your opinions will carry more weight if they pushed against the actual oppression of older men instead of defending the "angelic" woman.
If you believe it should be ok, then I would expect you to much more vocally support men who are criminalized for such things. Until that equality occurs, this woman deserves prison.
I agree here.Trump said:I know it's legally considered sexual abuse, but 22 years in state prison for having sex with 17 year old teenagers who were probably going to turn 18 the next day, each probably 6'2 and 200 lbs, and likely consented to the sex?
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.