Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
being naive IS NOT the downfall of being true.iqqi said:I completely resonate with this, we are the same in this way!!! I boldened my favorite parts, that I could have written myself. Don't you HATE feeling naive? At the same time, I know it is the "downfall" of being true. And... It is true, you do tend to think people are like you. Which makes me wonder about the people who see the world so negatively, by the way.
That's harsh. So you are saying me and TM are sheep, and NOT people who inherently assume people are as honest about the things we are honest about?joekerr31 said:being naive IS NOT the downfall of being true.
being ignorant / naive is not some virtue - its a bad thing. it doesn't make you TRUE, it makes you ignorant.
it also assumes that you can't be knowledgable and true at the same time - when in fact, the only way to true is to be knowledgeable. if you aren't, then you aren't being true, you're just a sheep who has been conditioned to think a certain way.
I don't think she or I are arguing those points either.joekerr31 said:being naive IS NOT the downfall of being true.
being ignorant / naive is not some virtue - its a bad thing. it doesn't make you TRUE, it makes you ignorant.
I only hate that part of myself when I actually catch someone in a lie I believed. Hahaha. If someone tells you a lie and you think it's truth because they want you to believe it, how is that bad on your part? Especially if you had no reason or evidence to believe otherwise?I even said I hated that part about myself.
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
you're the one who said 'being naive is the downfall of being true' - which makes a clear statement that you must be naive to be true.iqqi said:That's harsh. So you are saying me and TM are sheep, and NOT people who inherently assume people are as honest about the things we are honest about?
Why do women lie?iqqi said:I am going to keep this extremely bare of a question, before I go deeper into what is on my mind. The only structure I want to give to this discussion at this point, is that I mean Man, as in men. I am well aware all people lie, but I'd like to focus on the reason men lie.
Discuss.
joekerr31 said:you know why we are in a recession? cuz a bunch of naive idiots signed up for mortgages without knowing what they were signing up for.
Weren't those rates adjustable though? Didn't people know that going into it?cordoncordon said:It's the Fed's fault for lowering interest rates to historic lows 6 years ago that allowed banks to make these outrageously risky but potentially very profitable loans.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
They thought that IR's would stay low for the foreseeable future. Plus they were just out for the quick buck. A lot of the housing problems were caused by flippers, people not even interested in staying in the house. That created a false market and allowed prices to skyrocket artificially. Now instead of letting the natural market forces correct the excesses, the Fed is stepping in again to try and save everything. Thing is in 2 years they will only have made things worse...again.ThunderMaverick said:Weren't those rates adjustable though? Didn't people know that going into it?
Oh quit whining.Warrior74 said:stop being little faggots and get back on topic. do that **** in pm.
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
try pragmatism. not guilt, shame, etc.iqqi said:Ok, here is a question that is related. Spitzer was a man who lied to the People. He lied about who he was. And what he stood for (or against). But then it turns out that he was lying. What kind of lie was that. (Lets not focus on whether or not prostitution should be legal or not-this is about the lie).
Was it a lie out of guilt? Shame? And does it matter that his campaign had a lot to do with getting rid of something he supposedly was against... but was in fact doing?
cordoncordon said:Oh quit whining.
Ok, I am still interested in what others think of that.joekerr31 said:try pragmatism. not guilt, shame, etc.
if he told people he banged hookers he'd have lost his job.
i dont know why any of this is confusing to anyone. someone earlier hit it on the head - people lie out of fear or gain.
in spitzers case, it was both. he was afraid of losing his job and being publicly humiliated and he wanted to keep his job and keep making the money he was making.
although technically he never lied. i dont know of any examples where he said he didn't bang hookers - no one probably thought to ask![]()
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.