Update - hanging out one-on-one tonight with woman from “woman’s morality and cheating” thread

[Epic Days]

You mean they're jealous that a married woman who is also pregnant gets attention from men while they're single and currently not pregnant are reduced to being online on a men's forum for some attention.

Be magnanimous and show some pity.

This is closer to the truth than not. Lol
A woman in most relationships really miss those on-fire experiences. When they see another woman all on fire with desire they long to be them.

 

[AJ84]

Not only false but of course the standard feminine commentary.
I find women fun, caring and adorably enduring. They have their own ways that are the exact opposite of mine. Maybe one puppy in 50 will I find cute. All puppies are cute to a woman. Even ugly ones.

None of this takes away from the observable truth. So unless you ratted on all your girlfriends and heavily warned them against cheating on a boyfriend or husband, yes all women are like that. I was being facetious. It doesn’t mean the rare woman will do differently, it just means if you bet on it. You might as well hand over your cash.

The important part is the education of men. Unless of course you are guaranteeing I am wrong and it’s all false.

I’m not saying you are wrong about some women. But you realize that there are also men who honour the bro code of not ratting on men who cheat nor advising them not to cheat. In fact, there are more than a few threads on this very site that encourage men to cheat.
I’m guess what I’m saying is that I don’t see how your claims of women and how some of them behave is that different than how some men behave re cheating, hiding cheating, etc.

You also didn’t provide a link to your claim that less than 10% of men cheat or are mean (your words).

You said it’s observable conduct. Is this a random sample of men you personally observed or did you find this data from someone else who conducted this research and it’s what they personally observed?

What methodology was used and was it longitudinal or cross sectional? Do you have a link to this?

 

[lamath]

I would just like to say that a man has alot more to lose when his women cheat
Than a women when a man cheat
Aka raising an other man child

 

[Epic Days]

I’m not saying you are wrong about some women. But you realize that there are also men who honour the bro code of not ratting on men who cheat nor advising them not to cheat. In fact, there are more than a few threads on this very site that encourage men to cheat.
I’m guess what I’m saying is that I don’t see how your claims of women and how some of them behave is that different than how some men behave re cheating, hiding cheating, etc.

You also didn’t provide a link to your claim that less than 10% of men cheat or are mean (your words).

You said it’s observable conduct. Is this a random sample of men you personally observed or did you find this data from someone else who conducted this research and it’s what they personally observed?

What methodology was used and was it longitudinal or cross sectional? Do you have a link to this?

Your job, should you accept this mission, is to stay a girl.
I said you were attracted to less than 10% of men. You don’t know anything about the plight of men. You have no interest in them. They are non human sexually to you. Unless you are saying you aren’t picky and any old cuck will do. But you’re not.
Your experience is very limited in the realm of men. Less than 10% are a good to go and the rest are for nothing important. Non human in the world of sex.

But you are quite skilled at social dynamics. You know this stuff in and out. You are going to follow the little flutters and butterflies you sometimes get.

 

[AJ84]

Your job, should you accept this mission, is to stay a girl.
I said you were attracted to less than 10% of men. You don’t know anything about the plight of men. You have no interest in them. They are non human sexually to you. Unless you are saying you aren’t picky and any old cuck will do. But you’re not.
Your experience is very limited in the realm of men. Less than 10% are a good to go and the rest are for nothing important. Non human in the world of sex.

But you are quite skilled at social dynamics. You know this stuff in and out. You are going to follow the little flutters and butterflies you sometimes get.

“The men who cheated and were mean were well less than 10% of men.”
Is what you wrote.
My question is where is the data on this claim. If you meant that I am attracted to less than 10% of men, then why didn’t you write “you are attracted to less than 10% of men.”

I don’t claim to know the plight of men, I’m not a man. You are not a woman, yet to claim to know all about them based on what you are posting.
If I claimed to know all about men most of the members here would call me on that, rightfully so. However you don’t seem to notice the irony.

 

[Spaz]

Your job, should you accept this mission, is to stay a girl.
I said you were attracted to less than 10% of men. You don’t know anything about the plight of men. You have no interest in them. They are non human sexually to you. Unless you are saying you aren’t picky and any old cuck will do. But you’re not.
Your experience is very limited in the realm of men. Less than 10% are a good to go and the rest are for nothing important. Non human in the world of sex.

But you are quite skilled at social dynamics. You know this stuff in and out. You are going to follow the little flutters and butterflies you sometimes get.

There's no point arguing or holding discussions with women.

Point in case, AJ is married, yet she's online in a men's forum, you think that's appropriate for a married women or that her husband is happy with?

If he's happy with it then he's a confirmed cuck.

It's likely he doesn't even know her extracurricular activities with a men's dating forum.

Either way he's manipulated.

Same goes for any man here holding discussions with her.

 

[bacchus]

“The men who cheated and were mean were well less than 10% of men.”
Is what you wrote.
My question is where is the data on this claim. If you meant that I am attracted to less than 10% of men, then why didn’t you write “you are attracted to less than 10% of men.”

I don’t claim to know the plight of men, I’m not a man. You are not a woman, yet to claim to know all about them based on what you are posting.
If I claimed to know all about men most of the members here would call me on that, rightfully so. However you don’t seem to notice the irony.

The irony is that here you are, in a men’s forum, dispensing advice/seeking virtual male validation. You don’t see Epic Days posting at Chatelaine.

 

[Epic Days]

i like that women sometimes post in threads. In every case, there is something to dissect.

Like I said earlier in this thread:

There are some pretty heavy threads with no female input and yet this one catches the attention of three?
One of these things is not like the others.

I wonder what is at stake here?

when three women suddenly come alive in a single thread there is something for them to protect. This is where the contrast resides. The Feminine Imperative vs. the awareness level of men. And naturally none of them are like that. NAWALT.

 

[AJ84]

The irony is that here you are, in a men’s forum, dispensing advice/seeking virtual male validation. You don’t see Epic Days posting at Chatelaine.

I like posting here. I like giving advice and commenting on views, just like every other member here. I’m a female posting on a men’s forum. Yep. Occasionally a newish member throws that at me. That’s fine.

He wouldn’t post on a female oriented site where he knows his views would not be well received there. It would make no sense. And he never did send a link regarding the 10% claim. My statement about the irony of someone claiming to know all about women and my question about this 10% claim is being deflected.

I can see that it probably won’t be answered. That’s fine too.

 

[Spaz]

i like that women sometimes post in threads. In every case, there is something to dissect.

Like I said earlier in this thread:

when three women suddenly come alive in a single thread there is something for them to protect. This is where the contrast resides. The Feminine Imperative vs. the awareness level of men. And naturally none of them are like that. NAWALT.

It could be as you say or it's just an opportunity to get men into the feminine imperative.

A recruitment drive into the White Knight order.

Notice how they keep harping on the bro code?

As if they know it on a deep level as we men do yet they talk as if they lived and breath it their entire life.

The only code women live by is pure manipulation at whatever the cost as long as they benefit.

 

[Epic Days]

It could be as you say or it's just an opportunity to get men into the feminine imperative.

A recruitment drive into the White Knight order.

Notice how they keep harping on the bro code?

As if they know it on a deep level as we men do yet they talk as if they lived and breath it their entire life.

The only code women live by is pure manipulation at whatever the cost as long as they benefit.

If you are a man, you better read this over and over.
Good post @Spaz

 

[AJ84]

If you are a man, you better read this over and over.
Good post @Spaz

You mentioned in an earlier post that you have daughters. That you advised them to date older men and one did and the other didn’t. Not sure how old your daughters are if you’re only 34 and they’re dating (?) but in any case what do you advise them regarding how to live their lives?

 

[Epic Days]

You mentioned in an earlier post that you have daughters. That you advised them to date older men and one did and the other didn’t. Not sure how old your daughters are if you’re only 34 and they’re dating (?) but in any case what do you advise them regarding how to live their lives?

I’m not 34

 

[Spaz]

I’m not 34

Teen pregnancies is common.

Only the best genes gets taken early on haha

 

[Epic Days]

The worst thing a father can do is try to use a morality line to square his daughters away. I never did because I dikked preacher’s daughters and religious girls. It sets up a return loop for animosity to suppress a girl’s feminine propensities. You can’t win and I knew that from the beginning.

Religion has little or no effect on the biology of a woman. I do notice that some women feel pretty bad about their conduct and find religion but they remain easily had. Secret sex is very exciting for them. In fact some use religion to screen out cuckable, ridiculous men. It becomes a tool to actually support their biology. The easiest man to cuck in the world is a deeply religious man. He’s an utter fool. Not because of his beliefs but because he thinks women have his religious moral code when it comes to sex.

I told them to get married and have babies if they want. Young men are ridiculously stupid and inexperienced at life. I told them that a man 10 years older than them would take better care of them.
One is visibly content, normal life problems aside. She goes with the older guy.
The other daughter goes for men her own age and there’s a lot of issues.

The problem is the entire social structure is even harder on women than feminized men. Women are too easily led down dead end paths by social and political forces. Women are more apt to be agreeable socially. They conform like little minions. They are taken advantage of because of their feminine biology. Turning potentially great women into degraded beings is apparently the norm.

Hey girl, do this and acquire all your dreams. It’s quite the travesty. It’s all a lie. She is not equipped, as a rule, to engage the world as a man would. Her barriers are not men. Her barriers are intrinsic.
To get her over this biological barrier she has been convinced it’s because of men. Men are easy prey for manipulation by women and women are easy prey to manipulation by perceptions fed to her socially.

Raising daughters is about being her early example. Stern yet loving. Steadfast and resolute in his own position. To beat her up for her biology is like kicking a dog two days after he’s chewed up one of your shoes. He has absolutely no idea why you’re kicking him.

 

[AJ84]

I’m not 34

Oh, FYI your profile says you were born June 21 1984 and that you are 34.

 

[Epic Days]

Oh, FYI your profile says you were born June 21 1984 and that you are 34.

I must have made an error putting it in.

 

[Spaz]

I must have made an error putting it in.

Dude you're wasting time.

All she's doing is manipulating you by twisting ur own words against you.

So what if you put in ur age as 22 or 33 or 44 or 55 or 66 or 77, it doesn't matter. This is a male forum on male matters that transcend age.

Only females have problem with age. The older they get the more lousy they become.

 

[Epic Days]

Dude you're wasting time.

All she's doing is manipulating you by twisting ur own words against you.

So what if you put in ur age as 22 or 33 or 44 or 55 or 66 or 77, it doesn't matter. This is a male forum on male matters that transcend age.

Only females have problem with age. The older they get the more lousy they become.

Oh I know. Lol
She searching for angles. I totally get it. I’m entertaining myself. The idea of looking up her information would never occur to me because it’s irrelevant.
Yesterday was a little rough on her. Especially your post about being on the forums without her husband’s knowledge. Priceless and revealing.

The post about my daughters wasn’t for her. It’s for the men who are going to have daughters and how they might want to look at it from a red pill perspective. What she thinks about it is useless data.

 

[Epic Days]

Only females have problem with age. The older they get the more lousy they become.

I like this quote @Spaz. Extremely perceptive. I hadn’t viewed this concept before. That is a leadership acquired perception. Thanks.