guru1000
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
- Messages
- 5,384
- Reaction score
- 4,403
There are competing “drives” or forces” that direct your behavior. It’s called intent.You are mistaken. “Ego” is a useless, senseless and inaccurate word. The drive of a man is his force.
you insert “ego” in places where you should have labeled drive/force and inserted it in places where there is aberration. It’s a miss mash in your head.
Intent to give or intent to take. All motivations originate from either intent. Ever sharing operates from either intent. One can share with the intent to take for thyself, or accept the share with the intent to give joy to the sharer.
Every action you take derives from either intent. If that intent is driven by ego, you are in a taker paradigm. If driven by vulnerability, you are in a giver paradigm.
The Universe has no ego. It operates fully with intent to give because it already has everything To give. It needs nothing other than your appreciation and accepting of what IT desires to give. We can accept by taking for ourself alone (Ego) or
accept by giving via sharing through appreciation to please The Giver (vulnerability).
If you adopt a giver paradigm, you operate in
a similar wavelength of The Universe.
This is not an opinion, a religion, nor a philosophy. This is my experience. Take all of it, take some, take none of it. Irregardless, it will operate this way. This is really not Sosuave material when most men here are simply trying to get their dik wet. But in its application will bring men toward women of character and a giving nature and be naturally averted by trash as in @EyeOnThePrize example.
Pay attention to your intent in your responses and you will see which paradigm you are operating from. Pay attention to that force and ask yourself what true and lasting benefit you derive.
Because the force that drives me to write these words and memorialize them forever to a select few who will evolve permanently brings me true and enduring benefit, more so than the benefit of seeking relevance.
Last edited: