EyeBRollin
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2015
- Messages
- 10,779
- Reaction score
- 8,748
- Age
- 34
Why won’t you accept Trump losing?Legitimately asking the question, what if there is election fraud?
Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
Why won’t you accept Trump losing?Legitimately asking the question, what if there is election fraud?
See, that's what I am talking about. There is some sort of fraud somewhere in any election, I would guess, but that does not mean we should stop having them.Legitimately asking the question, what if there is election fraud?
The seed is already planted. Trump supporters will never accept a loss as legitimate. They’re full of excuses.See, that's what I am talking about. There is some sort of fraud somewhere in any election, I would guess, but that does not mean we should stop having them.
This is exactly what is going to happen. Trumo will lose, claim fraud, and refuse to leave office. He would urge his base to start a civil war before he would admit defeat. The man is incapable of caring about anything other than himself. He would put himself above his country at any opportunity.
Trump supporters already have their mind made up for November; when he loses, it will be “rigged.”The election hasn't happened yet. Why would I already assign analytics and a conclusion on something that has not even happened?
^^^^ exhibit A: The Trump supporter.Or perhaps we already know illegals are voting and we want a fair election.
Does gerrymandering fall under your definition of "fair?"Shouldn't ANY voter want a fair election?
Legitimately asking the question, what if there is election fraud?
Do men actually respond to direct questions like this?Why won’t you accept Trump losing?
Makes sense. But like I had said, up until then I had never seen the polls be that wrong before when it came to a presidential election. It was the modern version of Dewey Beats Truman. But I had figured modern polling techniques had improved to the point where we wouldn't see something like that again.As for the election, with anything else, use ACTIONS to recognize the likely outcome. NOT words.
Polls are words. Signs in lawns are action.
TV is just words, rally attendances are action.
^^^^ Another Trump supporter having to stoop to insults instead of putting a coherent thought together.Do men actually respond to direct questions like this?
I'm not saying this to be a smart azz, but if my life depended on the correct answer.... I'd nearly swear that EyeBRollin is a female that eithe identifies as a man or pretends to be one - in hopes to be taken more seriously.
Exactly. Polls are worthless. Go do polls of 100 people at the bus stop in front of the welfare office. And go do 100 in the parking lot of an NRA event. It is what it is, which is UNRELIABLE.Given that we all (mostly) have now caught on to the fake news industry, it makes sense to question the polls themselves.
If you do a search looking for "poll oversampling trump", or substitute trump for clinton, you will find that the easy way to rig polls is to just oversample the desired group.
Add a dash of fake news and a shocking surprise of an election.....and it all falls together neatly like a little puzzle. The polls were junk and the fake news pushed it.
No insult intended with my above observation.^^^^ Another Trump supporter having to stoop to insults instead of putting a coherent thought together.
That’s an ad hominem. You have nothing substantive to add to this discussion.No insult intended with my above observation.
Seriously.... reading your rebuttals, gives off this visual of a woman with her hand on her hip and her index finger extended out.
Again, no veiled insult intended, I'm simply speaking my thoughts.
I'm more convinced that you are a woman, that is posting as if you are man... than actually one.
I believe there's a lot of truth in this analogy.Nixon used to talk about the silent majority. Perhaps the left and the media have demonized conservatives so much that they will not want to admit to a surveyor who they actually voted for, or are intending to vote for.
Republicans have only won the popular vote once in the last 30 years. What silent majority?I believe there's a lot of truth in this analogy.
Back in 1972, I was too young to vote, but was pulling for McGovern. I also remember Nixon using the "silent majority" phrase.
They are.liberals today... seem to believe that if someone is a conservative, they are against equality for women, gays or other races.
That’s another lie. Fascist judges, tax cuts for the wealthy, science denial, locking up brown people in cages like animals. His conservative street cred is bona fide.Because Trump's policies have been more liberal than any other Republican president,
She’s a babe. Piping hot.You need more Candice Owens and less Huffington Post.
There you go again focusing on me instead of the topic at hand. Trumps incompetence crashed the stock market. He failed to contain the virus. What are your thoughts on that?@EyeBRollin
I accuse you of being a female that is posting under the guise of a man.
Are you prepared to prove me wrong?
You can do so, by answering my direct questions with direct answers (not sidestepping, diverting or changing the subject).
My first direct question is; are you willing and capable of answering my next followup post with direct answers?
The above is a direct question, therefor; as a man (if actually you are one, of course) you are only obligated to respond with either
"yes" or "no."
Admit it.There you go again focusing on me instead of the topic at hand. Trumps incompetence crashed the stock market. He failed to contain the virus. What are your thoughts on that?