Master Don Juan
- Jan 5, 2008
- Reaction score
I understand what you wrote but not the graph itself. Move toward more passivity, lower dominance, higher EQ? But still, very interesting.
As expected from an intellectual.I understand what you wrote but not the graph itself. Move toward more passivity, lower dominance, higher EQ? But still, very interesting.
Did you know a woman can be totally UN-ATTRACTED to you...
And she'll still sleep with you?
If you've ever seen a girl go home with some asshole she didn't even LIKE, you know this is true.
But how is this possible?
Because deep inside her brain, sexual desire has nothing to do with what you LOOK like...
And everything to do with how you make her FEEL.
Matt Cook knows this all too well.
Matt is a nice guy... but he steals women from JERKS all the time.
In this free video training below, he'll show you how he does it:
I'm 101% certain @biblebelt is an Expressive.Let me get this straight Biblebelt who s hobby is attracting young Daddy issue girls 4 Japanese rope bondage sessions he s a passive?
As for me I freely confess my weaknesses are probably introversion and EQ. Been working on those a while not easy to fight your nature. So how am I expressive.
I remember Myers Briggs was scientifically studied and found to have little correlation. Zodiac has been disproven many times.
Great thread I'm not throwing rocks.
Spaz if you ve got some evidence to back your theories I would honestly be really interested.
It doesn't change my conclusion nor will it negate my narratives here.@Spaz I think it would help to further explain more traits/characteristics of an expressive personality as well as the other categories.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but this type of personality assessment is used in business/sales? Seems very similar to what you have posted.
Most people are never 100% in any single category. I'm expressive(extroverted, little fear, somewhat big personality, creative, can get people to do what i want easily) as you picked up on, but I also have an analytical side(thinker, good listener, don't talk too much, use data to drive decision making, focused, driven, organized, self motivated, engineering mind, task oriented) which tempers some of those more emotional traits that you typically see in artists and actors. Professions that involve a technical aspect along with working with people is a good fit for me. Examples: Technical Sales, Project Development, Project Manager.
I see you list PUA's as being expressive. I certainly have little issues seducing women once I get them around me. I will use a little flash, style, charm, and boldness to my advantage.
Perhaps this info further confirms or changes your conclusion?
True, good but not great. Natural at nothing.It doesn't change my conclusion nor will it negate my narratives here.
If u r what you say then u r straddling partially within the The Motivator quadrant with ur dominant traits firmly inside The Expressive.
Those skills are what you're learned and picked up on but it's not ur natural skill set hence you won't be really great at it - and that cannot be denied no matter how you wish it so.
You'll never be as great an engineer that The Mystery man is capable off nor will you be as great an analyst (numbers) as The Intellectual is capable off - you can be good in those fields but never near those predisposed towards it, I think you know this to be so and need me to confirm it.
Oh that's where many mistake an Expressive, u r a natural and will be great at it at ur given natural tendencies.True, good but not great. Natural at nothing.
I don't think anyone can achieve 0 dominance, perhaps near to it.I’m expressive, but I can’t do 0 dominance it’s not and never has been me. I’m quite a fiery character too.
Yes. Salieri vs. Mozart.As expected from an intellectual.
And the answer is yes.
As an example, let's take photography, a typical geeky nerd will know the in and outs of all the technical aspects of photography, what lens to use, the proper lighting etc, even better then any famous photographer could ever be but he will fail to win any awards or recognition simply because a natural has one thing going for him - a highly developed EQ to capture that right moment and bring out that right emotion/beauty to fore.
Makes sense now?