HaleyBaron
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
- Messages
- 2,763
- Reaction score
- 2,341
There's a lot of cowards in politics and government, I agree. Compared to someone like Andrew Jackson and other hardasses of the past, they're all a bunch of p*ssies.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
It is true that children are a big cost. It's only after I have succeeded in accumulating & building generational wealth do I feel like I could afford children (this cost includes the contingency that my mating partner could demand separate housing, which is something the father would need to provide since his child would be there).As a guy who just had a kid, this is completely wrong. Do you have any fvcking children, OP? Unless you need your kids working your subsistence farm, children are a net negative for economics and productivity. They're expensive and drain away all of your time and energy. Birth rates are down because having a child in a modern economy is basically volunteering to cut off your hands.
when did your average man have the power?
Nothing "average" about Bin Salman or the sheiks that hold The UAE in an iron gripNow.. in the middle east![]()
What about egypt? Like it or not. Average men there seem to be able to control their women (to the point of mistreating them imho)Nothing "average" about Bin Salman or the sheiks that hold The UAE in an iron grip
If you're part of/connected to the military junta that wields absolute power over the lives of the citizenry at large... Yeah, life in The Land Of Pharoahs is probably on easy mode. Fair inference though:What about egypt?
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
Will an Egyptian daughter yell at her dad disrespecting him? The common father?If you're part of/connected to the military junta that wields absolute power over the lives of the citizenry at large... Yeah, life in The Land Of Pharoahs is probably on easy mode. Fair inference though:
MOST Egyptian men don't fall into this category, and likely never will. Mos societies outside of The Post-Industrial West remain segmented between aristocracy/something like it and commoners, with little to no social mobility
The topic we were discussing was: "When did "average men" have the power?" Fellas in the trailer parks and slums of North America b-tch slap their offspring and women for uttering words they find insufficiently reverent all of the time, frequently without the courts subsequently getting in the middle of thingsWill an Egyptian daughter yell at her dad disrespecting him?
They slap their women cause their women are disrespectful and just as rude. And lack femininity. Men don't just suddenly become abusers out of nowhere. Women tend to be the ones to encourage it.The topic we were discussing was: "When did "average men" have the power?" Fellas in the trailer parks and slums of North America b-tch slap their offspring and women for uttering words they find insufficiently reverent all of the time, frequently without the courts subsequently getting in the middle of things
We're seriously desperate, if THAT's were our bar "for having the power" begins
Back to the point("When did average men ever have the power?"):They slap their women cause their women are disrespectful and just as rude. And lack femininity. Men don't just suddenly become abusers out of nowhere. Women tend to be the ones to encourage it.
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Men disciplining their women and children is the backbone of a sane society. And you're acting like men were literally beating them to a bloody pulp. You've been brainwashed by feminist media, like many people today. Men would even exile women for cheating or being manipulative to keep the tribe/ community intact. With all that is talked about on this forum, women acting a fool should be common knowledge here.Back to the point("When did average men ever have the power?"):
If we now define "having the power" as being able to smack your woman without being arrested and prosecuted, even when you're dirt poor and have zero influence in society... Well, our thinking is more shallow than Logan Paul's grasp of theoretical physics
If a guy wants to be a pathetic simp that is his choice and no one else’s business. Plenty of people who complain about it are just competing for the same woman and assume that clearing out the other simps would magically put them next in line. If a woman finds you unattractive it does not matter whether she has zero simps or two hundred. The gender ratio is roughly one to one, monogamy still exists, and not every woman can have hundreds of exclusive suitors. Most women with large followings are not dating those guys. They are collecting validation and shekels.All this simping discussion is really odd.![]()
If A simps on B, that's their business. If A wants to be some pathetic simp, then let him.
The only reason you think it's your business is, you're also simping on her and you assume if she didn't have other simps, she'd date you. So it's your business because others simps are your competitors.
If you wanna be honest, that's the real reason simping bothers you.
The truth is, whether or not she has simps will not affect whether she'll date you. If she thinks you're unattractive, it doesn't matter if she has 0 simps or 200 simps. She's just not dating you, bro.
Like I've said all over this forum, the ratio of men to women in the world is 1 to 1. Not all women can have 500 guys exclusively chasing her. That's mathematically impossible. As long as monogamy exists in the world, there's literally someone for everyone.
Most women who have lots of followers don't care about her followers. She gets validation, that's it. She's not dating any of them anyway because she knows guys worth having aren't simping anyone.
The topic we were discussing was: "When did "average men" have the power?" Fellas in the trailer parks and slums of North America b-tch slap their offspring and women for uttering words they find insufficiently reverent all of the time, frequently without the courts subsequently getting in the middle of things
We're seriously desperate, if THAT's were our bar "for having the power" begins
Who on here cares about birthrates, lol?My hypothesis which will be difficult to prove is that women desire attention more than sex and as a consequence the over saturated market of simps is providing that attention for women without the corresponding increase in sexual frequency that would have occurred in the days before online simping was available to provide said attention.
Now follow me on this concept. Generally women now are inundated with attention online and this has caused a dysfunctional dating scene that results in less committed relationships which directly impacts pregnancy relates
of course this is a multifactorial issue but simps are partially to blame and honestly in my opinion they are creating a bit of a traffic jam in the social landscape in general
thoughts?
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.