"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"

Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.

She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.

Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.

So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.

The words come later. The impression comes first.

Read more...

Should we de-fund/abolish the police?

Should we de-fund the police?


  • Total voters
    39

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
3,617
Age
33
Location
Sweden
The definition of libertarianism to which I am referring to involves the following: A political philosophy that upholds individual liberty as a core principle. Maximum freedom and autonomy, freedom of choice, voluntary association, and individual judgment. Restriction of coercive social institutions and limited state power.

-Augustus-
Yes... right-libertarianism is based on negative liberty as an ideal (freedom is to be free from violence and fraud) whereas left-libertarianism is based on positive liberty as an ideal (freedom is control over decisions and consequences to the extent they affect you).
 

"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

U

user43770

Guest
About the riots specifically:

1) That it's easier to change your life than to change an entire system. He'd probably advise minorities living in Minneapolis to move - maybe even outside of the USA.

2) That protesting or rioting can make you a target - the government can't track everybody, contrary to popular belief, but it will track those who seek attention.

3) That business owners who are victims of looting should not rely on police for protection.

4) That organized solutions are group traps. You sacrifice money, time, and freedom for limited results. (Circles back to #1.)

5) That feeling unnecessarily guilty over the state of affairs is being in the Morality Trap.

I could probably go on and on...
I respect the hell out of Harry, but the libertarian movement died with him. Their platitudes, while justifiable, aren't realistic. Same as liberals.
 
U

user43770

Guest
@samspade not to say that a person shouldn't read "how I found freedom in an unfree world."

Game changer for me and you. Red pill before there was one. I'd take a knee before Harry Browne, as king.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
16,782
Reaction score
9,997
I'd take a knee before Harry Browne, as king.
What is up with all this taking a knee business? I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but it is odd that there was the anthem protest in the NFL with athletes taking a knee, and then that cop murdered George Floyd with his knee, kneeling in almost the same position. Kind of weird.
 
U

user43770

Guest
Agreed on both posts. It's not realistic from a governing standpoint. Otherwise we'd have competing sewer systems and interstates.

But from a standpoint of personal sovereignty, he was spot on.

And he wouldn't want you to take a knee!
He would have been an intelligent, benevolent king. He was a good person, and I don't say that about many people.

There are so many holes you can poke in libertarianism, if you want to be realistic.
 

"She's Out of Your League"

You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.

Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.

She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.

Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.

Read more...

U

user43770

Guest
What is up with all this taking a knee business? I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but it is odd that there was the anthem protest in the NFL with athletes taking a knee, and then that cop murdered George Floyd with his knee, kneeling in almost the same position. Kind of weird.
It's a show of submission.
 
U

user43770

Guest
@zekko the knee hold is common around the world for police. Bowing before an NFL commissioner, on the other hand...
 

Augustus_McCrae

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
907
Reaction score
1,020
I'm not that concerned over whether "income" is taxed at a flat or progressive rate.

I am concerned about dividing "income" into what used to be called earned income and unearned income - the concept of economic rent arising from platform monopolies, barriers to entry (but also to exit, especially for individuals' choices), anticompetitive practices, externalities (like pollution and burnout, or benefitting from public infrastructure and spending), market cornering (such as in real estate, particularly since land is a fixed and unevenly valuable supply), privatized natural monopolies (like commercial banking that creates the money supply), and inheritances that source back to acts of violence (such as privatization by land enclosure, or income from slavery).

I don't think capitalism is a desirable form of government, but I think a progressive implementation of economic democracy is the way to solve that, not "taxation of income". In other words, I'm a left-libertarian.
Why do you think capitalism is not desirable?

-Augustus-
 

Augustus_McCrae

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
907
Reaction score
1,020
I'm not that concerned over whether "income" is taxed at a flat or progressive rate.

I am concerned about dividing "income" into what used to be called earned income and unearned income - the concept of economic rent arising from platform monopolies, barriers to entry (but also to exit, especially for individuals' choices), anticompetitive practices, externalities (like pollution and burnout, or benefitting from public infrastructure and spending), market cornering (such as in real estate, particularly since land is a fixed and unevenly valuable supply), privatized natural monopolies (like commercial banking that creates the money supply), and inheritances that source back to acts of violence (such as privatization by land enclosure, or income from slavery).

I don't think capitalism is a desirable form of government, but I think a progressive implementation of economic democracy is the way to solve that, not "taxation of income". In other words, I'm a left-libertarian.
And what do you mean by “a progressive implementation of economic democracy“?

-Augustus-
 

"She Liked You in March. It's October Now."

Attraction runs on a clock.

She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.

The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."

One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.

Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.

Read more...

Alvafe

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
3,361
Reaction score
1,594
Age
43
I'm not that concerned over whether "income" is taxed at a flat or progressive rate.

I am concerned about dividing "income" into what used to be called earned income and unearned income - the concept of economic rent arising from platform monopolies, barriers to entry (but also to exit, especially for individuals' choices), anticompetitive practices, externalities (like pollution and burnout, or benefitting from public infrastructure and spending), market cornering (such as in real estate, particularly since land is a fixed and unevenly valuable supply), privatized natural monopolies (like commercial banking that creates the money supply), and inheritances that source back to acts of violence (such as privatization by land enclosure, or income from slavery).

I don't think capitalism is a desirable form of government, but I think a progressive implementation of economic democracy is the way to solve that, not "taxation of income". In other words, I'm a left-libertarian.
ok, and what is economic democracy?
 
U

user43770

Guest
@EyeBRollin some countries covertly use capitalism to fuel their socialism, but those chickens have been coming home to roost since Trump has been in office
 
U

user43770

Guest
Suddenly, European nations are having to worry about their own defense. And they're seriously starting to think about the possibilities.
 

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
3,617
Age
33
Location
Sweden
Why do you think capitalism is not desirable?

-Augustus-
Because it isn't built on positive liberty: control over decisions and consequences to the extent they affect you. Instead it is built on negative liberty, and thus it sanctions authoritarian economic relations which is a contradiction against [economic] democracy.

This leads to deprivation, exploitation, and suffering - although much of it could be alleviated with the right kind of capitalist government, this doesn't happen in practice and capitalism's inherent tendencies (like cost shifting, profit maximization, regulatory capture and a large distance between decision makers and the affected) largely work against it. Statism is also undesirable because a state is an authoritarian institution just like a corporation, and totalitarianism is even worse as your civil liberties are removed. But capitalism relies on and always has relied on the state, including for violence against organized labor.

That said, I don't think capitalism should be replaced in a blind, destructive frenzy nor do I think democracy in of itself is inherently good because people may not be good (just ask Socrates). Virtue in culture is fundamental to organizing a successful society for a pro-social species like ours, regardless of which form of government there is. I am pragmatic and pessimistic.

And what do you mean by “a progressive implementation of economic democracy“?

-Augustus-
It should be implemented in a way that doesn't cause civil war.

ok, and what is economic democracy?
"Economic democracy is a socioeconomic philosophy that proposes to shift decision-making power from corporate managers and corporate shareholders to a larger group of public stakeholders that includes workers, customers, suppliers, neighbours and the broader public. No single definition or approach encompasses economic democracy, ..." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy
 
Last edited:

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
16,782
Reaction score
9,997
I get it, but a vocal minority should NOT get to make the silent majority less safe. There are people in that city who weren't responsible for any of the mayhem, attempted to discourage or stop it, spoke out against it(at their own risk), and lack the resources to leave. If Minneapolis goes through with this, every politician in that city should be rounded up and publicly executed, for serving their flock to the wolves.....after a speedy trial, of course.
And as has been noted, if there are fewer police, it's the poorest people who are going to suffer the most.
 

Xenom0rph

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
1,907
Reaction score
2,437
As @Solomon already pointed out, abolishing the police department would only encourage armed vigilante gangs patrolling around like they're the Justice League and it would only result in more violence and more looting. Businesses would leave, residents would move away and the communities would slowly die.

Drug gangs would move in and set up shop unchecked.

Abolishing the police dept is an idiotic idea.
 
U

user43770

Guest
As @Solomon already pointed out, abolishing the police department would only encourage armed vigilante gangs patrolling around like they're the Justice League and it would only result in more violence and more looting. Businesses would leave, residents would move away and the communities would slowly die.

Drug gangs would move in and set up shop unchecked.

Abolishing the police dept is an idiotic idea.
Way to state the obvious. You gonna get worked up about it?

Obviously, no police is a horrible idea. Who would protect the elites? Lollol
 

"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"

You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.

She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.

Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.

Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.

Read more...

Top