Photofeeler charges you to have 20 or more people rate photos for various categories.
I had a bunch of photos rated.
What is absolutely amazing is seeing how the same photo taken from two angles gets 20% variation in looks, intelligence and trustworthiness. Pictures of myself taken in 2016 range from 75% high to 25% low - amazing. My dates rates from 99% high to 42% low.
The numbers don't correspond to a 1-10 scale. They are a mathematical sorting - if you are 99% that means your photo rated higher than 99% of the people. So 51% still isn't bad as you're in the better half of photos.
Note that a photo rating for a girl tells you a LOT more about her attractiveness than a photo rating for a guy, which omits presence, height, confidence and income which mean more to women than looks. For men, think of it as pass/fail.
These huge variations underscore the need to have your profile pictures professionally reviewed to avoid having one of these slightly wrong features appear that knocks the rating down.
I had a bunch of photos rated.
What is absolutely amazing is seeing how the same photo taken from two angles gets 20% variation in looks, intelligence and trustworthiness. Pictures of myself taken in 2016 range from 75% high to 25% low - amazing. My dates rates from 99% high to 42% low.
The numbers don't correspond to a 1-10 scale. They are a mathematical sorting - if you are 99% that means your photo rated higher than 99% of the people. So 51% still isn't bad as you're in the better half of photos.
Note that a photo rating for a girl tells you a LOT more about her attractiveness than a photo rating for a guy, which omits presence, height, confidence and income which mean more to women than looks. For men, think of it as pass/fail.
These huge variations underscore the need to have your profile pictures professionally reviewed to avoid having one of these slightly wrong features appear that knocks the rating down.
