It's not, you just think it is since you're a lawn tech with an ego problem.
I'm not going to explain things again, you can just refer to these resources going forward:
Semmelweis reflex,
Dunning-Kruger Effect.
This sort of substance-less deflection for emotional reasons is extremely feminine dude. I keep telling you it turns the chicks off but that's your problem. At the end of the day you just sound like an insecure bit who needs to get their hyper-rational masculine image validated and has to go online for that fix since women and peers won't do it for you. No different from all the boss girls who ignore the reality of their own incompetence in favor of participating in a cultural circle jerk.
Actually you do. If you come across as some stupid dweeb who can't take a hint you're fvcked. No amount of dancing or rationality is going to save you if the woman thinks you're too stupid to read her signals. No woman is going to make the moves for you...
This sounds like the kind of nonsense that would make a woman walk away from you. I'm a pragmatic guy. That's why I'm ignoring your noise.
If you bother looking into any of the resources I provided you'll learn that humans in fact are not rational creatures, and logic itself is not sufficient to handle the complexities of the world. Not that it matters though - you irrationally cling to your beliefs for emotional reasons rather than engaging with scientific evidence.
Same to you, buddy.
This is wholly false. You should study some biology, psychology, and neuroscience before making statements like this. I think you even complimented the paper I shared showing caterpillars are able to learn and retain the concept of a specific person through metamorphosis and even across generations.
For a typical human example: you don't need to learn that women make good mates logically as some sort of new concept. The idea is so old and intrinsic to our survival strategy that you're born with it pre-programmed and experience it as an emotion.
And wouldn't you know that most human behaviors are driven by market incentives, which ultimately trace back to the desire for reproduction/survival? Really, we are very far from rational on average - we just respond to incentives and have a part of our brain that can think logically for a higher cost, and that's good enough to survive and prosper. Another resource from a Nobel prize winner if you ever wish to open your mind:
Thinking, Fast and Slow.
Better not, you don't know what you're talking about.
Fvck it
Some keyboard commando summons a Plinco
Poof! Plinco appears
Plinco: Wtf do you want? I'm about to go to bed.
Young man: I demand automatic knowledge! I demand to be taken care of by other people!
Plinco kicks the man
Young man: ouch!
Plinco: How does that feel?
Young man: That hurts Plinco
Plinco: That feeling was instant. That's what we call a sensation. What you touch, smell, taste. No mental effort needed. Animals do this.
Plinco shows the man a color.
Plinco: What color is this?
Young man: Blue!
Plinco: Great! Still easy enough. Seeing a color is a perception, which again is something an animal can do.
Young man: You see that Plinco! I didn't have to learn anything to know that's the color blue.
Plinco: Not so fast buddy! The perception of the color was automatic through your sensations but tying it to a definition makes it a simple concept. To attribute the word 'blue' was something you had to learn to do.
Young man: Oh you mean when I learned my colors and shapes when I was a wee little kid.
Plinco: That's right.
Next Plinco asks the young man to solve for the derivation of a production curve.
Young man: Cool! I'm doing this right now in my third year in calculus.
Plinco: Do you know anyone who knows how to do this without any prior knowledge?
Young man: Of course not.
Plinco: Then I shall rest my case.
Young man: Wait, is there any innate knowledge that humans are born with?
Plinco: There's some indications from studies that show that babies might be afraid of heights. Otherwise if you put them around snakes, spiders, or whatever, babies are not afraid of any of these, in fact they are curious. Thus fears are learned.
Young man: I can conceptualize my feelings
Plinco: Well after you thought about them, of course.
Young man: So what you're saying is that I have to think to conceptualize.
Plinco: Yeah no sh!t
Young man: But Plinco, I know that I'm attracted to women. I didn't have to learn that.
Plinco: Of course you fool! That's a perception, not a conception. Do you not see these pride events. As if being being gay was some kind of accomplishment. Taking pride is what you do when you've earned something. You see the similarities between these homosexuals full of pride and people who think they were born with conceptual knowledge?
Young man: Yes. Knowledge is something you have to put mental effort into learning. Sensations and perceptions, like getting a feeling, or seeing the sky, are automatic and not some prideful achievement.
Young man: But Plinco, butterflies retain some of the memories that it formed while it was a caterpillar. That means we do too.
Plinco: Are you a caterpillar?
Young man: No
Plinco: Is this conceptual knowledge that the caterpillar is passing onto the butterfly?
Young man: No
Plinco: Good! I'm glad we settled that.
Young man: One more thing Plinco. Talk like this dries women's pvssies. It's all about emotional intelligence you see. You have to be emotionally intelligent to get women to be emotional. And when you think, it turns women off. So that's why people who have high emotional intelligence gets the girl.
Plinco: You don't need to read her mind to make her feel emotional. I can think of a few dudes I know who are way better at reading people, being tactful, etc. who I've gotten laid more than they have. An extreme example, I knew a guy who I used to work with who was really good at reading people, was so desperate that he sold half his stuff and moved halfway across the country to go live with a women whom he never met in person.
Experience is not at the mercy of a theory.
