Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
I don't think this is his angle, but to me, guns are one of the greatest weapons against it, only because it gives people a real voice. "Democracy" these days means whatever the mob of the government want.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
I find that difficult to believe considering that Britain was a highly militarized society up until the early 20th century. You do realize that the Second Amendment to the U.S. constitution is actually based on the English Bill fo Rights, which guaranteed the right to own weapons to all protestants?
At the risk of hijacking this thread even further, what you're saying is not entirely correct. The monarchy in the late 18th century was constitutionally limited but still a lot less ceremonial than it is today. Kings and queens still appointed and dismissed prime ministers at will and had major influence on foreign and domestic policies. But the War of Independence was mostly about taxes.
from my observation, sarcasm in women is an ongoing sh1t/fitness test. They use it as rapid defense, it’s pretty easy to break through if your quick/witty back or used amused mastery. It’s very exhausting after a while though and it’s downright annoying with less attractive girls.
The armed citizenry is being controlled by republicans who want the status quo. That's why there was little push back against Jan 6th, and the party has been docile since. Now they talking about suing through the court to get things done, despite the fact nothing ever gets done going through the government that just cucked you. I don't like Democrats, but the republicans are just as ***** whipped.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
What pisses me off is that the uglier girls are using it with inflated egos. That's really what rubs me the wrong way. They have no business trying to act like that when they are at the bottom of the chart as far as attractiveness go. They are the last ones that should be **** testing.
Crime is more related to poor economic prospects, people with nothing to lose often resort to a life of crime. If you ban guns it would just lead to knife and truck attacks like in Europe.
There's more than one factor, let's have a look at where these crimes are happening.
Sound similar lifestyle to my 20's!
Indeed mate, thats why I use audiobooks all the time now.If only I got the chance to read books what with all the work/exams/projects/renovations/fatherhood.
Saying that I get the time to post my nonsense on here.
An experiment is something new, something that hasn't be done before. In that sense, the U.S. is not an experiment but rather a remnant of how things used to be everywhere in the West. Gun ownership is associated with the traditional masculine culture and the spirit of self-sufficiency. Gun bans are a product of left-wing ideology and the nanny state. Just because the weirdos outnumber traditional men these days doesn't change the the fact that they are weirdosNot saying that bud.
what I meant was first world democracies as they are equivalent to the United States.
a lot of folks own guns in the Middle East and South America but they aren’t meaningful comparisons.
the point I was addressing was “who is weird?”
The point was made was that Europe banned guns and this means we are the ones being weird. Whereas the point I was making is the US is the outlier here. The US is kind of the experiment, the rest of the world prohibited guns, rightly or wrongly
To be clear, I'm talking about men too
