do we have to accept that all women are slvts?

[Muscle brain]

Considering you want a LTR with a woman, when you start to look for red flags and you screen her etc, and then at some point you realise she's been a who-re...Would you still consider a long term relationship with her?

I mean, nowadays all women have had ONS, they've fvcked some dude raw style, they may have had an abortion, they may have done a threesome or two, they've sent nudes to a few guys, and they all have fvcked dozends of guys so...

Should we delete this point from the list of red flags?

It is already pretty difficult to find a single woman who you find attractive, is good to you, sex is good, you're both compatible etc, so if we next her because she's been too much of a slvt... we'll probably be nexting ALL WOMEN. It is said that who-res dont make good wives though...

Thoughts?

UNFORTUNATELY, You Said it ALL!!!
First Rule
-Never turn a HO-E into a Housewife
Second Rule
-Never let them change you
Third Rule
-Never Forget The First and the Second Rule

 

[Muscle brain]

plus just because she is taking it slow with you doesn't mean that she hasn't jumped on some guys **** at the club after 15 mins.

INDEED

 

[El Payaso]

No. Not all women are sluts but it sure as hell seems like it.

 

[The Duke]

Considering you want a LTR with a woman, when you start to look for red flags and you screen her etc, and then at some point you realise she's been a who-re...Would you still consider a long term relationship with her?

I mean, nowadays all women have had ONS, they've fvcked some dude raw style, they may have had an abortion, they may have done a threesome or two, they've sent nudes to a few guys, and they all have fvcked dozends of guys so...

Should we delete this point from the list of red flags?

It is already pretty difficult to find a single woman who you find attractive, is good to you, sex is good, you're both compatible etc, so if we next her because she's been too much of a slvt... we'll probably be nexting ALL WOMEN. It is said that who-res dont make good wives though...

Thoughts?

It all depends on why that person is/was promiscuous. Is it a phase they are going thru? Is it related to insecurity or was she seeking validation?

Was she looking for reassurance that she was still attractive so she went out and bent over for 6 dudes to validate herself?

Did she fuhk a bunch of guys trying to get over a divorce?

Most women use sechs to bond/attach. Does she fear bonding/attachment?

Does she have lots of sechsual partners because she is impulsive? Emotional? Lacks self control? Lacks self esteem?

If the high partner count was a result of a phase she went thru, then its not a huge red flag. If the high partner count is because she is impulsive, emotional, and lacks self esteem then it’s a huge red flag that will make having a successful relationship with her nearly impossible.

And those past things she regrets(abortions, 3some, etc, bad relationships) are all baggage she will NEVER get rid of. It will affect her ability to bond with all future partners.

 

[dude99]

Considering you want a LTR with a woman, when you start to look for red flags and you screen her etc, and then at some point you realise she's been a who-re...Would you still consider a long term relationship with her?

I mean, nowadays all women have had ONS, they've fvcked some dude raw style, they may have had an abortion, they may have done a threesome or two, they've sent nudes to a few guys, and they all have fvcked dozends of guys so...

Should we delete this point from the list of red flags?

It is already pretty difficult to find a single woman who you find attractive, is good to you, sex is good, you're both compatible etc, so if we next her because she's been too much of a slvt... we'll probably be nexting ALL WOMEN. It is said that who-res dont make good wives though...

Thoughts?

Date. Smash. But do not marry.

 

[bigneil]

Subtitled: Has anyone found any non-slvts?

 

[The Duke]

Subtitled: Has anyone found any non-slvts?

I used to date a 35yo who had 5guys before me. All she had been in were long term relationships, never any casual dating.

 

[Young OG]

They are all slVts. Some are just worse then others.

 

[bigneil]

I used to date a 35yo who had 5guys before me. All she had been in were long term relationships, never any casual dating.

The formula is generally you take the number of guys women say they were with and multiply by 3. For guys, divide by 2.

I literally had sex with a girl I later found out was a call girl (this was 1990) who swore she had only had two boyfriends. They simply "don't count" everyone else.

 

[The Duke]

The formula is generally you take the number of guys women say they were with and multiply by 3. For guys, divide by 2.

I literally had sex with a girl I later found out was a call girl (this was 1990) who swore she had only had two boyfriends. They simply "don't count" everyone else.

Big Neil, I'm fully aware of how it works, I've been around the block a few times. I knew this one for several years. Her story checked out with many people.

You can't paint the world with one brush stroke.

 

[bigneil]

One broad brush stroke?

So, in theory, there is one middle aged non-slvt on Earth. Thanks for your research!

 

[The Duke]

So, in theory, there is one middle aged non-slvt on Earth. Thanks for your research!

If you want to draw conclusions from such a small sample, then I suppose so! The rest of the women I've been with don't even come close to being middle aged with that few of partners. I'd suspect that's the norm just as the OP is suggesting.

 

[bigneil]

If you want to draw conclusions from such a small sample, then I suppose so! The rest of the women I've been with don't even come close to being middle aged with that few of partners. I'd suspect that's the norm just as the OP is suggesting.

We were talking about examples of non-slvts, provide more if you have them.

 

[FwoGiZ]

but the thing is that, even if you want to put that aside, the fact that she's been a slvt and has fvcked dozens of men makes her unable to really bond with you, and the chance of her cheating on you is, in the long term, high.

All I read here is insecurity and blaming women for being women when the problem most probably comes from within, being unable to deal with not so innocent anymore women. It's easy to deal with women who have no experience, specially in bed...
If you think only women with high count cheat, you are delusional. If you think they can't bond, you are delusional too... As I said, there is a way to have a healthy happy relationship with those women but insecurity and trying to control and dictate them what they can and can't do obviously doesn't work just I suggest you try another method maybe.

We're tossing the word slvt around but do we even all agree on what it means? To me, it doesn't mean anything much... an open minded women that live in the 21st century and that like sex is a slvt basically. For all I know, I am a man-slvt too apparently.

3 years ago, I met the biggest slvt I've ever seen... so far, she's proven to be from VERY VERY far the most bonded women to me ever. She is extremely caring, very fun, outgoing, helpful, pulls her on weight and there is a reason we've been together 3 years. Do I try to control her? No cause I'm not blue pill beta and I can deal with those fun girls that you call slvts. Is she LTR material? Absolutely... could I ever hope that she wouldn't sleep with no other guys? Well duh... women enjoy novelty of sex with new person too so no; to think otherwise is blue pill. Thing is, we have a good deal going on... and I trust her. I am not an insecure guy and am confident in my abilities and value. It took her a bit longer to get it too but now this relationship is running as smooth as you could hope.
Downside; can't be too open about it cause chumps don't get it, think I'm cuckold and think she's being disrespected or whatever else they hallucinate. But there are more people like us than you can think of but most are all very low profile just cause they don't wanna hear opinions from people hoping they'd still lived in the 40s.

So are all women slvts? Well "all" is an extreme as devilkingx2 is mentioning so no. Are most women slvts? Thank god they are.... cuz I LOVE sex too Is it a bad thing? Not if you live in the 21st century. Is the concept of relationships evolving faster than most people can adapt? Methink so

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I used to date a 35yo who had 5guys before me. All she had been in were long term relationships, never any casual dating.

She learned you and the sex was frequent and great I suspect.

 

[AlexKaiser]

So....All women want the option to be sluts, AKA all women do want to feel sexy and have sex and get men that they normally wouldn't believe they could get. However the ones who aim too high or overvalue themselves are the cancer, right?

 

[AlphaNate]

No. Not all women are sluts but it sure as hell seems like it.

We attract what we are.

 

[TheGambino]

yes all hoes

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

it's because there's more guys who think that women are innocent angels than guys who treat every woman like a bar slvt, if the average man's problem was thinking that women are all ultra hardcore slvts, then the red pill knowledge would be that "all women are virgin princesses"

technically both extremes are false though
.

Probably like a curvaceous bell curve.

 

[JohnChops]

Do ALL women go out and **** a different guy every day/week? No. Do SOME ... Yes. Do you all think girls aren't ****ing guys, they're just waiting for you to sweep them off their feet ;D. What a fairy tale!

But seriously, im with zek, absolutes are never correct in science and society. Not all women will **** a new guy every week or have guys on the hook for fun. Some girls thrive on that shir, usually the ones with low self esteem. Some girls talk to 1 guy and some talk to multiple (aka spin plates).

That's why we weed out the bad and keep the good.