"She Liked You in March. It's October Now."
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
article on 'modern man' and feminism.
- Thread starter sexybeast
- Start date
"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
strong like bull
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Messages
- 498
- Reaction score
- 7
long but good read. one of the most powerful things a man can have, is the ability to walk away from a woman, or any other losing situation at the drop of a hat. lifes too short to walk on eggshells or put up with someones bxll**** all the time.
-SLB
-SLB
Master Bates
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2007
- Messages
- 1,001
- Reaction score
- 10
This article's old.
I wouldn't give much credit for the writer. He sounds like an a***ole. Insecure, manipulative and undignified. He's just parroted stuff he's read on seduction websites. I read up some articles by his wife... sure, she is insecure and did a stupid thing by writing about their marriage in a national newspaper, but a real man wouldn't go so low as to describe how he fu***d his wife after he cheated on her. Maybe women are horrible and evil, but there has to be some respect if you call your union a marriage. His action is not even juvenile, just vile.
Here's one of his wifes columns:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=456237&in_page_id=1879
Here's one of his wifes columns:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=456237&in_page_id=1879
"I just moved here from Florida."
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
Okay, that paints a completely different picture on this guy.Ever since I stumbled, by accident, across an email to a woman, Daphne, arranging to have coffee with her in New York on my birthday last September, despite the fact that he was on his knees, tears whooshing out of his big, dark eyes, begging me not to throw him out, telling me how much he loved me and would never, ever cheat on me again, I have been waiting for it to happen again.
hyperactive
Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 1
Bah. Yet another shining example of why the institution of marriage and exclusive relationships is doomed to fail. One of the biggest problems in the world is this burdening belief in the 'true love' myth. Sure there are those rare perfect marriages, but how many of those aren't rife with conflict. So my point is, what's the point? Why include oneself in such a transaction? It's so utterly pointless that I am really lost on why people bother with marriage and monogamy. It's holding us back. The most valid argument for monogamy is that broken homes tend to result in psychologically disordered progeny, while stable homes make for stabler societies. Just look at how most men in prison were fatherless and you will see what I mean.
But a family can be healthy regardless of whether the father or mother are together. One or the other can even be absent. What matters is that a child gets adequate nurturing from multiple adults throughout their development, preferably from both men and women. SO this pretty much throws the moral approach to marriage out the door. While it may have worked as a buffer against strife in biblical times, we need to go beyond taking orders from moral doctrines about how we should conduct our affairs.
But a family can be healthy regardless of whether the father or mother are together. One or the other can even be absent. What matters is that a child gets adequate nurturing from multiple adults throughout their development, preferably from both men and women. SO this pretty much throws the moral approach to marriage out the door. While it may have worked as a buffer against strife in biblical times, we need to go beyond taking orders from moral doctrines about how we should conduct our affairs.
Her own wordsNighthawk said:How do you accidentally stumble on an email again?
Yeah, thats sound really accidentally.I have been hacking into his emails (quite easy, actually, even when he set up a secret account), listening to his voice mails and reading his text messages