“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
article on 'modern man' and feminism.
- Thread starter sexybeast
- Start date
"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
strong like bull
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Messages
- 498
- Reaction score
- 7
long but good read. one of the most powerful things a man can have, is the ability to walk away from a woman, or any other losing situation at the drop of a hat. lifes too short to walk on eggshells or put up with someones bxll**** all the time.
-SLB
-SLB
Master Bates
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2007
- Messages
- 1,001
- Reaction score
- 10
This article's old.
I wouldn't give much credit for the writer. He sounds like an a***ole. Insecure, manipulative and undignified. He's just parroted stuff he's read on seduction websites. I read up some articles by his wife... sure, she is insecure and did a stupid thing by writing about their marriage in a national newspaper, but a real man wouldn't go so low as to describe how he fu***d his wife after he cheated on her. Maybe women are horrible and evil, but there has to be some respect if you call your union a marriage. His action is not even juvenile, just vile.
Here's one of his wifes columns:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=456237&in_page_id=1879
Here's one of his wifes columns:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=456237&in_page_id=1879
"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Okay, that paints a completely different picture on this guy.Ever since I stumbled, by accident, across an email to a woman, Daphne, arranging to have coffee with her in New York on my birthday last September, despite the fact that he was on his knees, tears whooshing out of his big, dark eyes, begging me not to throw him out, telling me how much he loved me and would never, ever cheat on me again, I have been waiting for it to happen again.
hyperactive
Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 1
Bah. Yet another shining example of why the institution of marriage and exclusive relationships is doomed to fail. One of the biggest problems in the world is this burdening belief in the 'true love' myth. Sure there are those rare perfect marriages, but how many of those aren't rife with conflict. So my point is, what's the point? Why include oneself in such a transaction? It's so utterly pointless that I am really lost on why people bother with marriage and monogamy. It's holding us back. The most valid argument for monogamy is that broken homes tend to result in psychologically disordered progeny, while stable homes make for stabler societies. Just look at how most men in prison were fatherless and you will see what I mean.
But a family can be healthy regardless of whether the father or mother are together. One or the other can even be absent. What matters is that a child gets adequate nurturing from multiple adults throughout their development, preferably from both men and women. SO this pretty much throws the moral approach to marriage out the door. While it may have worked as a buffer against strife in biblical times, we need to go beyond taking orders from moral doctrines about how we should conduct our affairs.
But a family can be healthy regardless of whether the father or mother are together. One or the other can even be absent. What matters is that a child gets adequate nurturing from multiple adults throughout their development, preferably from both men and women. SO this pretty much throws the moral approach to marriage out the door. While it may have worked as a buffer against strife in biblical times, we need to go beyond taking orders from moral doctrines about how we should conduct our affairs.
Her own wordsNighthawk said:How do you accidentally stumble on an email again?
Yeah, thats sound really accidentally.I have been hacking into his emails (quite easy, actually, even when he set up a secret account), listening to his voice mails and reading his text messages