"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Anyone else really dislike Mystery Method?

Vice

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,004
Reaction score
186
It's too systematic and scripted.

I suppose the appeal is that any dork can spray out a canned line and get results.

Trouble is, the MM only teaches technique, and no inner game, so alot of guys that are new to dealing with women can't hold up a conversation for very long.

It's great for beginners, but I've noticed that alot of guys who have their sh*t together laugh at almost every aspect of it.
 

"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

intrextrovert

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
186
Reaction score
1
yeah

i think it's fine to have an opening line and a few tricks in your sleeve so to speak when approaching random women, esp. if you're new, but laying someone meetup to lay with someone else's words is just wierd and creepy.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
148
Reaction score
1
Location
CA
after reading the game by neil , he pretty much lived with mystery for a good year , I use to think his methods were bs, I still think some of them are, but there are some good things that hide behind the b.s....
 

bornyesterday

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
120
Reaction score
2
Location
Netherlands
Mystery was the first one who had the balls to lay out the game step by step afaik. This is the first time a pua can actually be accounted for by his words. We can test his teachings.

His method gives us a usefull blueprint to get a hold over the structure of gaming. If you dont like what he teaches you can still have his stepped plan in the back of your head to have a feeling about where you are and what you're doing.
It's just technique, so its rather useless for other problems. But that's also its strong point. The method is not polluted by any philopsophy or inner game issues. It's a set of instructions that you can use in daily interactions. You use it and by testing and mastering them you can hopefully grow beyond them.

But I dislike the man personally for the fact that he says he's about inner game, that we misunderstand him if we think his method is just about getting a girl into bed. That's the biggest load of crap I ever heard.
I believe his technique is a true refelection of how the guy is: just form, no substance.
 
Top