"The Kiss of Death Mistake"

You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?

Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.

One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.

Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Read more...

Anyone else really dislike Mystery Method?

Vice

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,004
Reaction score
186
It's too systematic and scripted.

I suppose the appeal is that any dork can spray out a canned line and get results.

Trouble is, the MM only teaches technique, and no inner game, so alot of guys that are new to dealing with women can't hold up a conversation for very long.

It's great for beginners, but I've noticed that alot of guys who have their sh*t together laugh at almost every aspect of it.
 

"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"

Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."

You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.

She's been waiting forty minutes.

Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.

Read more...

intrextrovert

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
186
Reaction score
1
yeah

i think it's fine to have an opening line and a few tricks in your sleeve so to speak when approaching random women, esp. if you're new, but laying someone meetup to lay with someone else's words is just wierd and creepy.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
148
Reaction score
1
Location
CA
after reading the game by neil , he pretty much lived with mystery for a good year , I use to think his methods were bs, I still think some of them are, but there are some good things that hide behind the b.s....
 

bornyesterday

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
120
Reaction score
2
Location
Netherlands
Mystery was the first one who had the balls to lay out the game step by step afaik. This is the first time a pua can actually be accounted for by his words. We can test his teachings.

His method gives us a usefull blueprint to get a hold over the structure of gaming. If you dont like what he teaches you can still have his stepped plan in the back of your head to have a feeling about where you are and what you're doing.
It's just technique, so its rather useless for other problems. But that's also its strong point. The method is not polluted by any philopsophy or inner game issues. It's a set of instructions that you can use in daily interactions. You use it and by testing and mastering them you can hopefully grow beyond them.

But I dislike the man personally for the fact that he says he's about inner game, that we misunderstand him if we think his method is just about getting a girl into bed. That's the biggest load of crap I ever heard.
I believe his technique is a true refelection of how the guy is: just form, no substance.
 
Top