"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

Anyone else really dislike Mystery Method?

Vice

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,004
Reaction score
186
It's too systematic and scripted.

I suppose the appeal is that any dork can spray out a canned line and get results.

Trouble is, the MM only teaches technique, and no inner game, so alot of guys that are new to dealing with women can't hold up a conversation for very long.

It's great for beginners, but I've noticed that alot of guys who have their sh*t together laugh at almost every aspect of it.
 

"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.

For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.

Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.

The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.

Read more...

intrextrovert

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
186
Reaction score
1
yeah

i think it's fine to have an opening line and a few tricks in your sleeve so to speak when approaching random women, esp. if you're new, but laying someone meetup to lay with someone else's words is just wierd and creepy.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
148
Reaction score
1
Location
CA
after reading the game by neil , he pretty much lived with mystery for a good year , I use to think his methods were bs, I still think some of them are, but there are some good things that hide behind the b.s....
 

bornyesterday

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
120
Reaction score
2
Location
Netherlands
Mystery was the first one who had the balls to lay out the game step by step afaik. This is the first time a pua can actually be accounted for by his words. We can test his teachings.

His method gives us a usefull blueprint to get a hold over the structure of gaming. If you dont like what he teaches you can still have his stepped plan in the back of your head to have a feeling about where you are and what you're doing.
It's just technique, so its rather useless for other problems. But that's also its strong point. The method is not polluted by any philopsophy or inner game issues. It's a set of instructions that you can use in daily interactions. You use it and by testing and mastering them you can hopefully grow beyond them.

But I dislike the man personally for the fact that he says he's about inner game, that we misunderstand him if we think his method is just about getting a girl into bed. That's the biggest load of crap I ever heard.
I believe his technique is a true refelection of how the guy is: just form, no substance.
 
Top