Max Rex,
Okay, here we go. So the concept of White Supremacy is, about the Top 1% of Elite White and Jewish Groups who promote policies, business plays, buy off politicians, etc., designed to maintain their wealth status while at the same time trying to push out blacks from rising up to acquire some (or all) of that wealth status?
Now, if this is White Supremacy, here are my next questions/comments:
- You say that significant examples of White Supremacy come from the South, with white guys running around with Confederate flags (like Dylan Roof)? How can that be an example of White Supremacy if Dylan Roof was poor and his family wasn't well off? Based on your definition of White Supremacy, it would seem as though one of Mitt Romney's sons would have shot up the Church instead?
- Going back to South, once again you said significant examples of White Supremacy come from the South, but if White Supremacy is about the Top 1% trying to stay in power, why would significant examples come from the South when most of the Top 1% don't reside there? Most of the Top 1% are in the Northeast, Midwest and West, not the South?
- You say that the Police Departments represent White Supremacy, but again, nobody that works in the Police Department is apart of the Top 1% and most Police Officers don't even make 6 figures?
- Bank of America has been sued for all types of Discrimination. From blacks (as you mentioned), to also lesbians, gays, and a female group in general. So if Bank of America represents White Supremacy, but they are also doing crap to lesbians and gays, does White Supremacy extend to hating lesbians and gays as well? Does it extend to hating white women as well? It appears to me that BOA just has underwriting and hiring practices that are inefficient, because it's not just blacks that are having problems.
- I asked you a question about black on black crime and black on white crime, I said does it matter to the same extent to YOU as white on black crime does? You said all crime is bad, okay, why do YOU think there's not as much outrage against black on black crime like there is for white on black crimes? For example, every black person wants to hang George Zimmerman, right? But seeing as though all crime is bad, why aren't black thugs who kill other black people on a daily basis not targeted by other blacks like George Zimmerman is? I'm saying, why the selective outrage, if all crime is bad, why aren't you guys trying to kill Zimmerman AND the black thugs?
- You graduated from St. Johns, you are studying to be an Attorney, you have also received some grants and loans (even though you said you don't use credit, a "loan" is considered credit). St. Johns is about 45% White and about 15% Black, with a bunch of other races mixed in. The Legal Profession and all Law School Tiers are majority White People, which means that the people that would train you to be an Attorney are majority White. I'm assuming the people who extended you loans and grants, were mostly White organizations.
If White Supremacy is holding YOU BACK, why are they helping you here in terms of your career progression? I mean those loans are coming mainly from the Top 1%, they invest in those loans to get a return on their money. The Top 1% are letting you into their Law Schools to train to become an Attorney. Why are they doing that if they are trying to hold you back?