Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
When a guy calls me a racist and then pitifully, post after post, tries to smear me and cannot produce a single phrase I've written that backs up his charge, I am done trying to talk.
I agree, I feel the same way when they call me a Coon. I just don't understand why liberals, moderates and conservatives can't come together and have real discussions...without demonizing each other.
He doesn't have an argument. It's vague generalities & liberal doubletalk.
Everything is topsy turvy though. Everything we know to be true we're told it's the opposite. Not only is there not "systemic racism" against blacks or "patriarchy" against women, but white men face more discrimination than anyone in the 21st century west. White men are a target for shaming at best. The more sinister liberal actors like Tavis Smiley or Cenk Uygur are quite open about the fact they want an ethnic cleansing and a systematic "browning" of America
Oh lordy lordy. You need to read more. Why do we have the fair housing act, sir?
....and?
Black people die sooner than white people. Black people are less likely to have health care than white people. Do we need to connect the dots for you?
Weed.
They also are disproportionally enforced. Black men are far more likely to get the death penalty. There's no chance in hell Dylan Roof will get the death penalty. Black men receive harsher sentences for the same crimes.
There's no point in correctional facilities if ex-convicts can not reintegrate back into society. May as well just kill em all or leave em in there for life. You clearly don't want them to become productive citizens, ever.
If that were so, conservatives wouldn't always be whining about "taking their country back."
You can google search any of the terms I've mentioned, including "institutional racism." I'm not going to spoonfeed you everything, especially when you cherry pick arguments left and right.
Correlation =/= causation. The facts are correct. Your interpretation of them is not. You are looking through a lens of a meritocracy. America is far from it. People don't start on the same playing field.
I can't spoon feed you this stuff. If 95% of blacks have a certain perspective, perhaps you should seek the conversation with more and have them explain why they feel that way. You will probably still disagree, but if 95% of them have a consistent thought as you say, there is probably at least some degree of merit to it.
A theory is an explanation, just to be clear. A theory is not a guess.
On the subject of institutional racism, you are wrong. On the facts (drop out rates, etc.), you are correct.
Black men are doing more of the crimes, but you never ask the question "why?"
LOOK LIKE is racism. If Tenacity pulls his pants down his ass, he will get profiled more. Tenacity could be an A student or a billionaire. The point is, because Tenacity is black and has his pants down his ass, none of his "merits" matter. He's just another thug black man in the eyes of police.
No, I never made that argument.
Nope. That was not my argument.
Why? That would be anecdotal evidence. The data says that black men are more likely to be stopped by police than white men.
I don't. But the fact that it COULD be because of racism is something a white man doesn't have to deal with, which is exactly the privilege I'm talking about. That's the point.
UPS won't deliver the whole route because they can't make a profit doing so.
I already explained that in detail.
Goalpost fallacy.
I've tried to have a conversation, usually they just call you an Uncle Tom/sell-out or a Coon. They don't even seek to have a conversation. Even on this forum, I tried speaking with Max Rex and Jaylon, all they did was call me an Uncle Tom Coon.
You said that I misquoted your stance in the prior post, can you respond and elaborate on exactly WHAT do you define as institutionalized racism? My belief was that it was defined as people getting certain types of better treatment or worse treatment, based on skin color. So the lighter you are (white) the better treatment you get, the darker you are (black) the worse treatment you get. This definition would apply across the board, to the black criminal getting treated worse than the white criminal, to the black MBA getting hired less/paid less/promoted less than the white MBA.
Supply me your definition of institutionalized racism or let me know if my definition of it in your opinion is correct. Then I will formulate my next response/set of questions.
Well, it has to come down to one of the following:
Let me ask you a question. If I put on pink lipstick, a dress, a wig, some make-up, and some high heels, then walked around speaking in a high pitched voice.....would you NOT think I was gay? Would you not think I was a cross-dressing tranny?
He won't answer it, but the answer to that question is yes. We have a black President, black attorney general, black supreme court justice, black CEO's, black billionaires, thousands of black athletes, black TV channels, affirmative action in jobs and scholarships, black only night clubs. But the epitome of black privilege is the blank check to be racist against whites. Until that's taken away, we'll never see the end of the race card because it is profitable for the hustlers, and explains away individual failures of the common man.
Why do you think that is?
Correct, that is the definition regarding specific situations like the black criminal vs. white criminal.
It's option A for some, but more of option B.
Sure.
Sure.
He's going to profile because of human nature, he just has to respect equal protection clause. Anything otherwise is unconstitutional. And just because it is human nature, doesn't make it right.
It's racist in the sense that it applies disproportionately to black men, yes.
The post office is not UPS. UPS needs the post office's infrastructure to complete those routes.
Where did you come up with that argument?
That was not anyone's argument, nor are whites the victim of racism. You're really good at making **** up.
How is that preventing said white person from getting a job? Getting a loan? Putting them in jail?
