“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

Thinking you'll probably get rejected vs thinking you'll definitely get rejected

Status
Not open for further replies.

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
doing a simple askout on a woman I need to cross paths with again is a crippling phobia
You take this element of the mating environment to the most extreme level possible.

Neurotypical men do not enjoy crossing paths with a woman who rejected their date offer. It's an unpleasant reminder. Neurotypical men will typically not let it bother them so much that they alter their life plans over that.

Neurotypical men do not enjoy crossing paths with a woman after an interaction that had 1-2 sexless dates and no extended relationship. This would be especially painful for the neurotypical man if he was the one who had his 2nd or 3rd date offer ignored or rejected. He also wouldn't alter his life plans over it.

In a big city mating environment (metro area population 1 million +)...., the following scenarios are unlikely given some common sense...
  • Seeing a woman after she rejects your date offer from an in-person approach
  • Seeing a woman after 1-2 sexless dates in an interaction. It doesn't matter in this context whether the interaction was started from a tech method or an in-person approach.
  • Seeing a woman after one night of sex (no relationship) or a very short term sexual relationship that ended poorly.
 
Last edited:

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
645
@SW15 I'm aware in a city this size, I'm unlikely to cross paths with a woman after a failed daygame approach on a rando.

When I mention the risk of crossing paths with a woman after a rejection, I'm talking about scenarios like neighbors, employees at businesses I frequent, employees of my condo building, public transportation passengers I regularly ride with, coworkers, employees from other workplaces in my office building, etc.

My crippling phobia of crossing paths with a rejecter (to the point where I haven't asked out anyone I actually knew since 2012) is part of a larger pattern. In general, when a certain scenario terrifies me, I take extreme measures to prevent that scenario. Another example would be my crippling phobia of pregnancy (to the point where I prefer a woman who's at least reached peri-menopause)

Apps and organized singles events are ideal for me because:

1) I know for a fact they're looking for a man

2) Even if they don't want me, at least I'm unlikely to ever cross paths with her post-rejection
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
814
Reaction score
569
Come to think of it, even if the woman makes it extremely obvious, that still doesn’t exactly help me. The more obvious the woman appears to be, the more reluctant I am to act on her cues (because the more obvious her cues appear to be, the more of an idiot I'm going to feel like if it turns out I misread her cues)
@GoodMan32 me thinks you need to stop so harshly judging yourself for misreading female interest cues and using it as a criteria to confirm you're autistic.

Many men misread cues, even on this forum!

For example (I am female and KNOW this) there are many women who will actually text a man more often when she's less interested and women who will text a man less often when she is highly interested!

Seems counterintuitive but there's a reason behind that.

When a woman is highly interested, she is more cautious, she is nervous, she is anxious and she often needs to feel safe emotionally before she begins openly demonstrating her interest such as texting him, etc.

She might even appear less interested as a precautionary measure! A bit aloof even.

I am like this and many other women I associate with as well. As well as chatting with random women and reading books by reputable psychologists re human behavior and the like. Which I do often I love psychology and am a big reader!

On the other hand....

A less interested woman may simply be bored or she is seeking attention and validation, she is NOT nervous or anxious and figures she has nothing to lose and will recklessly throw caution to the wind and begin texting and chasing!

Many "normal" men misread this (the latter) as high interest when in many cases it couldn't be further from the truth!

Another example is a woman may smile at a man, be friendly and chatty which many men misread as her flirting and high interest when all she's being is sociable!

On the other hand a highly interested woman will again be anxious or nervous to approach or talk to him, she's more cautious and more guarded. Thus appearing to be less interested.

Many men ("normal" non-neurotypical) do not understand the various dichotomies in women's reactions and cues, you are NOT alone!

Not sure what other criteria you're using other than a diagnosis you received 22 years ago when you were 12 from ONE doctor.

As others have advised, get re-checked, stop hiding behind this diagnosis and go outside and start talking to people!

You have been hiding and making excuses for so long you've lost your ability to be social (with anyone) other than from behind a keyboard!

I am NOT suggesting you're not autistic, you probably are or may be on some level... but in any event...

Please....

Just go outside, talk to people and begin taking risks.

Rejection will NOT kill you I promise you!

It will actually make you stronger and more resilient which will increase your confidence and self-esteem which also seems counterintuitive but it's actually not, it's the opposite.
 
Last edited:

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
When I mention the risk of crossing paths with a woman after a rejection
The scenarios that you mention have some crucial differences between each other. It's important to point those out.

The majority of males hitting on women in the scenarios you mention have a fatal flaw. It is scarcity mentality. Men who hit on women in most of those scenarios are not properly socialized and their own SMVs are too low. These are men who aren't meeting enough women through legitimate means of meeting women and then consider some low probability scenarios. You only mentioned 1 scenario that a man with a true abundance mentality would use in order to meet women of the scenarios you listed.

neighbors
I don't recommend men use their apartment complexes or condo complexes for finding dates. That's the definition of crapping where you eat. It might be possible in some larger complexes (200+ units) but it's still improbable and still not the best idea.

In larger apartment or condo communities (I would call that 200+ units), you might be able to justify dating someone in the complex under one of 2 scenarios.
  • If you are in a mid-rise or high rise building (4+ stories), the woman lives on a different floor as you do, and you're not likely to ever go to that floor. It's still possible you might run into her in common areas, but some men are comfortable with that risk level, especially if you're only seeing her 1-2 times a month at best.
  • If you are in a complex of garden style buildings (multiple 1-3 story buildings), the woman lives a few buildings away and you're not likely to see her walking to/from your car. Like the last scenario, it's still possible to see her in common areas but the risk is mitigated if her building is not close to yours.
In general, men who consider hitting on their neighbors are usually lacking social options from their social life in general. They are not getting out in the world and meeting enough women.

The best play for interactions with neighbors in any type of housing (including single family houses) is to use neighbors as social connections to meet potential sexual partners. That's classic social circle game.

coworkers
Trying to seduce co-workers is another crapping where you eat scenario. This is a bigger problem for white collar, office type workers. Men with McJobs or other lower wage service sector jobs might be able to get away with doing this because those jobs are short term in nature for both males and females.

This is a bad idea for men who want to remain at their current jobs for the foreseeable future. Hitting on a co-worker, getting rejected, and seeing that person daily until one of you quits/gets fired/gets laid off is not going to be pleasant. Additionally, having interactions with co-workers of short term sex that flames out or going on 1-2 sexless dates will also cause some tension in the workplace.

As an additional issue, it is possible to have a workplace mating interaction get the attention of the Human Resources (HR) Department. HR is there to protect the company and that could lead to an employment termination. An employment termination is meaningless in a McJob or service sector job but it is a big issue in the white collar, office work environment.

In general, men who consider hitting on their co-workers are usually lacking social options from their social life in general. They are not getting out in the world and meeting enough women.

The best play for interactions with female co-workers is to use female co-workers as social connections to meet potential sexual partners. That's classic social circle game. However, most female co-workers will be married women who lack social connections so it wouldn't be a big loss to keep the employer and one's personal life separate.

employees at businesses I frequent, employees of my condo building
There is a great thread on this forum about approaching women while they are at their workplaces while you as the male are the customer/client.


The bottom line is that it is a waste of time to hit on women while they are working. It is a low probability play, even for top tier men.

When men hit on employees while in the role of customer, it is a sign that they operate in scarcity mentality. A man with true abundance does not engage in such low probability scenarios.

public transportation passengers I regularly ride with
I don't know a lot about this scenario. I have heard stories about men using public transportation in cities like New York City or London as places to do approaches. This could be a valid scenario. I've heard of this happening on subways and light rail type trains. I haven't heard of this happening on city buses before but it could happen.

I generally wouldn't recommend this.

It is somewhat well known that men will use airport terminals and airplanes as a way to meet women too. That's slightly different and considered a higher class version of the same thing. While commuters ride subways, trains, and buses to work day, fewer people are riding airplanes daily to travel. Even people with high travel jobs would be on airplanes less than someone might ride a subway in New York City.

Airport terminals and airplanes are often a low probability play too. I have experience as an approacher in airport terminals. That could be a separate subject.

employees from other workplaces in my office building, etc.
This is the scenario of the ones that you mentioned that is the best one for pickup. Hitting on women who work in other companies in the same building is often a good idea for finding dates. Every scenario is different but it is possible to hit on a woman in the same office building and rarely ever see her again.

Let's say a man and a woman both work in a 20 story office building. The man works for a company on the 4th floor and the woman works for a company on the 15th floor. It is unlikely that they would see each other in the building regularly. The man isn't going to need to worry about seeing her every time he needs to leave his desk to go to the bathroom. In reality, in this scenario, the man might see that woman about every 1-2 months in the lobby, parking lot, or building restaurant (if that's present).

In general, most people in other companies in the same office building aren't going to be attractive enough to want to ask on a date.

Additionally, it is possible to determine with enough probing questions if someone is available without asking them out on a date. There's a reason why in an initial approach that there's a initial conversation. It's worth collecting information to see if a woman is available and if there's enough of a connection to warrant 1-2 hours (or more) of conversation with alcoholic drinks at a bar.

My crippling phobia of crossing paths with a rejecter (to the point where I haven't asked out anyone I actually knew since 2012) is part of a larger pattern. In general, when a certain scenario terrifies me, I take extreme measures to prevent that scenario. Another example would be my crippling phobia of pregnancy (to the point where I prefer a woman who's at least reached peri-menopause)
The larger pattern is problematic for many reasons and must be addressed effectively.

Apps and organized singles events are ideal for me because:

1) I know for a fact they're looking for a man

2) Even if they don't want me, at least I'm unlikely to ever cross paths with her post-rejection
There is a long thread about structured singles events being total garbage on this forum....


At a regular bar, a woman is likely to be seeking new penis AND it is unlikely to ever cross paths in the future off of an approach at a bar. Additionally, the quality of women at regular bars on unstructured nights is far superior than the female audience that goes to in-person singles events.

Swipe apps are only useful for men in the top tier of looks and you're not there.
 

BaronOfHair

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
5,078
Reaction score
2,658
Age
37
Come to think of it, even if the woman makes it extremely obvious, that still doesn’t exactly help me
Yeah, throwing someone who's being attacked by a komodo dragon a long sword only benefits the person who's under attack, IF they pick up the blade then behead that damned lizard

It's incumbent on each of us, individually, to uphold our end of the bargain
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
You have been hiding and making excuses for so long you've lost your ability to be social with (with anyone) other than behind a keyboard!

Please....

Just go outside, talk to people and begin taking risks.
You have a valid point here. OP has poor social skills in general. There are scenarios with neurotypicals having poor social skills too.

In general, Generation Z (1997-2012 births) is known for having subpar social skills. The median Gen Z person has weaker social skills than predecessor generations.

Generation Y/Millennials (1981-1996 births) started the trend of poorer social skills with the 1990s-2000s era advances in technology. As the Millennial generation went along, social skills got diminished. Even earlier Millennials (1981-1986 births) often have weaker social skills than Baby Boomers or Generation X.

In the USA and other developed nations, there are now nearly 2 full adult generations who have been more likely to have subpar social skills. The growth in technology has been a large part in that.

@GoodMan32 me thinks you need to stop so harshly judging yourself for misreading female interest cues and using it as a criteria to confirm you're autistic.

Many men misread cues, even on this forum!
It is common for neurotypical men to misread cues. It's not a pleasant experience for a neurotypical man to have that happen.

I think there is a difference in how a neurotypical reacts to a social cue misread as compared to how an autist reacts to one.
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
814
Reaction score
569
It is common for neurotypical men to misread cues.
As a woman and as stated in my post @SW15 , many men (non-neurotypical) misread cues!

Anyway I edited my.post to read he is, in all likelihood, autistic (on some level but certainly functional), but he still needs to go outside and learn to socialize.

And yes rejection is not fun and can be quite devastating for some people however that shouldn't stop him from taking risks.

It does get easier and.less devastating after a few and after you learn to become resilient.

Problem is @GoodMan32 you are so full of anxiety and fear you won't even try which only keeps you STUCK and hinders healing, self-improvement and personal growth.
 
Last edited:

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
he still needs to go outside and learn to socialize.
Even if he were not autistic, he would still have poor social skills.

Neurotypicals with poor social skills have below average mating outcomes. With the Millennials and Gen Z, it is becoming more common to see neurotypical having poor social skills.

he is, in all likelihood, autistic (on some level but certainly functional)
I believe that he is autistic based on his posting history with interactions. Getting an updated diagnosis compared to 2003 would be useful too and might impact how his autism is treated in the present day.

It is also worth noting that incidences of autism spectrum disorder have increased with both the Millennials and Generation Z. Autism spectrum disorder has been diagnosed far more frequently with the last 2 generations.

With Millennials and Gen Z, there is an increase of...
  • Autism spectrum disordered people with poor social skills
  • Neurotypicals with poor social skills
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
814
Reaction score
569
It is also worth noting that incidences of autism spectrum disorder have increased with both the Millennials and Generation Z. Autism spectrum disorder has been diagnosed far more frequently with the last 2 generations.
Fair!

On the other hand.... from the National Institute of Health website:

Research indicates that a notable portion (some studies suggest up to 75%!).of autistic adults report having received a prior psychiatric diagnosis that was later deemed a misdiagnosis.
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
814
Reaction score
569
@GoodMan32 just want to say again I'm not suggesting you're not autistic, you probably are.

The reason why I'm a bit skeptical and encouraging you to get re-checked is because many years ago I was diagnosed with Bipolar 2 (not as serious as Bipolar 1 but still a fairly serious mental disorder).

I was prescribed meds which really screwed me up (which I stopped on my own) because as it turns out after being reassessed many years later, I do NOT have Bipolar at all!

I was misdiagnosed.

The reason for the misdiagnosis was because I was extremely stressed out after entering the legal field and working for the head honcho at a large international law firm.

Not sleeping, not eating, working long hours, on edge and anxious virtually all day every day even on days off, fluctuating moods from extreme highs to extreme lows... all due to STRESS!!!

NOT a mental disorder requiring meds! Nearly killed me, no joke.

As such I do not have a lot of faith in our country's healthcare system or even its doctors unfortunately. .

So YES admittedly I am projecting..

Anyway...

It's up to you and I wish you luck with whatever you decide to do.
 
Last edited:

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
@GoodMan32 just want to say again I'm not suggesting you're not autistic, you probably are.
Autism usually involves poor social skills and often a lack of socialization.

There are also neurotypicals with poor social skills who often retreat from socialization. With advances in tech since the 1990s-2000s, this has become easier to do, both for autists and neurotypicals.

Poor social outcomes can affect psychological perceptions of rejection.

many years ago I was diagnosed with Bipolar 2 (not as serious as Bipolar 1 but still a fairly serious mental disorder).

I was prescribed meds which really screwed me up (which I stopped on my own) because as it turns out after being reassessed many years later, I do NOT have Bipolar at all!

I was misdiagnosed.

The reason for the misdiagnosis was because I was extremely stressed out after entering the legal field and working for the head honcho at a large international law firm.

Not sleeping, not eating, working long hours, on edge and anxious virtually all day every day even on days off, fluctuating moods from extreme highs to extreme lows... all due to STRESS!!!

NOT a mental disorder requiring meds! Nearly killed me, no joke.
It is good that you do not have bipolar.

You had a toxic boss and were working for a toxic organization. So many white collar professionals work in toxic environments.
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
814
Reaction score
569
Autism usually involves poor social skills and often a lack of socialization.

There are also neurotypicals with poor social skills who often retreat from socialization. With advances in tech since the 1990s-2000s, this has become easier to do, both for autists and neurotypicals.
So what are you saying?

That it's OK for him to hide behind his autism as justification for remaining stuck in his own internal prison and not taking steps to self-improve, grow and evolve by venturing outside and learning to take some risks?

Why? Because it's become a "thing" among neurotypicals? And easier?

I'm confused because that's what it sounds like (to me).

Every time you emphasize his autism and statistics among neurotypicals, you're encouraging that, albeit NOT your intention.

Just my read on it.
 
Last edited:

Gamisch

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 2, 2022
Messages
4,973
Reaction score
5,786
Outfit is decent. Blue and gray work well. The belt seems fine for jeans.



Fair enough. Even just to socialize. And try for a number if it goes well.
Well... I Gotta " throw a @Hamurabimbi " now : this is all meaningless if the face isn't great/ on par with the outfit...heck, such an outfit NEEDS a great face to be successful!

I personally don't like this outfit tbh. This style( shirt tucked in) imo only works if you're ripped ( assuming you wanna SEDUCE women..)

Many shyte to unpack. I'll read the entire thread and respond later.
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
Just my read on it.
You are reading into things that don't exist.

So what are you saying?
I'm saying that it can be difficult for outsiders to see the difference between a poorly socialized autist and a poorly socialized neurotypical.

Additionally, in the mating environment, getting a shredded physique is the best thing that either a poorly socialized autist or a poorly socialized neurotypical can do to improve outcomes.

Personality matters less than looks.
 

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
645
@GoodMan32 me thinks you need to stop so harshly judging yourself for misreading female interest cues and using it as a criteria to confirm you're autistic.

Many men misread cues, even on this forum!

For example (I am female and KNOW this) there are many women who will actually text a man more often when she's less interested and women who will text a man less often when she is highly interested!

Seems counterintuitive but there's a reason behind that.

When a woman is highly interested, she is more cautious, she is nervous, she is anxious and she often needs to feel safe emotionally before she begins openly demonstrating her interest such as texting him, etc.

She might even appear less interested as a precautionary measure! A bit aloof even.

I am like this and many other women I associate with as well. As well as chatting with random women and reading books by reputable psychologists re human behavior and the like. Which I do often I love psychology and am a big reader!

On the other hand....

A less interested woman may simply be bored or she is seeking attention and validation, she is NOT nervous or anxious and figures she has nothing to lose and will recklessly throw caution to the wind and begin texting and chasing!

Many "normal" men misread this (the latter) as high interest when in many cases it couldn't be further from the truth!

Another example is a woman may smile at a man, be friendly and chatty which many men misread as her flirting and high interest when all she's being is sociable!

On the other hand a highly interested woman will again be anxious or nervous to approach or talk to him, she's more cautious and more guarded. Thus appearing to be less interested.

Many men ("normal" non-neurotypical) do not understand the various dichotomies in women's reactions and cues, you are NOT alone!

Not sure what other criteria you're using other than a diagnosis you received 22 years ago when you were 12 from ONE doctor.

As others have advised, get re-checked, stop hiding behind this diagnosis and go outside and start talking to people!

You have been hiding and making excuses for so long you've lost your ability to be social (with anyone) other than from behind a keyboard!

I am NOT suggesting you're not autistic, you probably are or may be on some level... but in any event...

Please....

Just go outside, talk to people and begin taking risks.

Rejection will NOT kill you I promise you!

It will actually make you stronger and more resilient which will increase your confidence and self-esteem which also seems counterintuitive but it's actually not, it's the opposite.
I'm aware even neurotypical men misread a woman's cues sometimes.

What sets me apart is the sheer rate at which I've misread a woman's cues. Neurotypical men don't misread a woman's cues at my close-to-100% rate.

One particularly noteworthy example of a misread cue was when a girl from my college mentioned (during a meeting for an extracurricular group I belonged to) she had an IUD so she could have casual sex without getting pregnant. I thought the fact she made that comment in my presence was a cue that she was open to casual sex with me. So I approached her after class one day and proposed we be casual sex partners. That's the level of social ineptitude we're talking about.

A neurotypical 14 year old boy might think a girl wants sex with him just because she talked about sex in his presence. A neurotypical 20 year old, on the other hand, would know better than to propose a girl become his casual sex partner just because she talked about sex in his presence.

Additionally, I've mentioned before on the forum that I went through a stretch shortly after I moved to my current state (I was 23) where I'd approach randos in public and ask if they'd like to come home with me. This wasn't an example of a misread cue. There was no cue. Even I knew there was no cue. It's still an example, however, of my social ineptitude (the fact I seriously saw nothing wrong with inviting randos in public to come over). I'm pretty sure a neurotypical 23 year old guy would know better than to do that.

While my 34 year old self is able to look back on my behavior at 23 and see (in retrospect) how cringeworthy I was acting (therefore I'd never go out now and invite randos in public to come over), there's probably something extremely socially inept my 34 year old self is doing that I'm not even aware of.

As for your question of other signs I'm an autist (besides the fact I've misread nearly 100% of the cues I've acted on from the opposite sex):

  • difficulty with eye contact
  • even though I've gotten better about it, I had no perception of personal space when I was younger
  • limited facial expressions
  • difficulty adjusting to change
  • difficulty making friends (Which isn't to say I've never had a friend. It just means friendships have been few and far between...and rarely last. Even when I had lots of neighborhood friends as a kid, they acted like I didn't exist at school. They were obviously only friends with me in the neighborhood out of geographical convenience)
Even though (as I mentioned on a recent post) there's really no evidence technology had anything to do with the social struggles I faced as a pre-teen, I'm willing to acknowledge the possibility technology plays a role in my current social struggles.

Another factor playing into my romantic struggles in particular is the reliance I've developed on escorts. I know we're not supposed to promote escorts on the forum. So I'm not promoting escorts (if anything, I'm sharing a case of why escorts can negatively impact a guy). All I'm saying is my reliance on escorts has caused me to forget how to deal with a free woman (something I was never very good at to begin with)

There was an instance in 2023, as well as a more recent instance in March of 2025, where I probably could have had free sex. Yet (as I just said) I've forgotten how to deal with a free woman. So I dropped the ball.

In the 2023 instance (which I posted about on the forum at the time), I sat on a bench chatting with a woman (close enough to my condo building we could see the building) for 2 and a half hours after our date. Yet not once did I try to get her into my condo.

In the March 2025 instance, a female friend was sitting right next to me on my couch watching TV. She commented "This is what I miss most about marriage. Watching TV together in the evening" (she was separated from her husband at the time). Hell, we even ended up in my bedroom at one point (She was just checking the place out. All our clothes were on). The fact I didn't manage to get laid (despite the fact she was basically setting the stage for me to nail her) is pretty pathetic. I mainly was afraid to ruin the friendship. As it turns out, we haven't met up since then anyway (and she's since gotten back with the husband). My fears of ruining the friendship (a friendship which doesn't even exist anymore, less than 6 months later) turned out to be irrelevant.

Lastly, to address your claim about how rejection won't kill me (which I already know) and how rejection supposedly increases my self-esteem, my experience (in terms of self-esteem) has been the total opposite. Getting rejected nearly every single time I've acted on a "cue" is what led to my low self-esteem.
 

If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.

Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.

This will quickly drive all women away from you.

And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
645
@SW15 When I quoted your super long post, it told me I had exceeded the word limit. So I'm simply going to tag you instead.

I'm going to touch upon the airport thing. I travel a lot. I've done some light flirting at the airport before. I wasn't able to progress (largely because, as I pointed out on my last post, I've pretty much forgotten how to deal with a free woman).

Your comment about most female employees from other companies in an office building being too mediocre to be worth asking out anyway, that's largely a matter of opinion. Some men only want to get involved with a woman who's at least a 7-8/10. It's no secret on this forum my standards are lower than a lot of men's standards. Additionally, I tend to be an extremely generous grader in terms of looks. 5/10 (using my definition) is about as low as I'd like to date/bang...but the typical man would probably say a woman I rate as a 5 is really a 3.

As an example, the obese 45 year old housewife I had a monthlong affair with at 23 is my idea of a 5. Even though (out of respect for her privacy) I won't post a picture of her on the forum, anyone reading this can easily visualize what an obese 45 year old housewife looks like. The fact that's my idea of a 5 speaks volumes about what a generous grader I am.

I agree with your premise about how you can ask strategic questions to find out whether you have a chance with a woman without explicitly asking her out. I recently mentioned on the forum about how I've gotten pretty good at collecting information to find out I don't have a chance with a woman.

Since I've only had minimal luck at organized singles events, I'm aware organized singles events have their drawbacks. Regardless, the format works well for an autist (What I mean by that is: Even if it turns out she's not into me, I'm at least given a chance to sell myself. A woman at an organized singles event is required to talk to me. A woman at an unstructured bar could, and likely would, blow me off)

Additionally, bars are a miserable environment for an autist (most autists at least). It's unfortunate how some of the top environments to find a partner just so happen to be miserable for autists (bars, night clubs, parties, etc). "Bar" is a vague term. For example, I have no problem with eating dinner at the bar when I'm visiting a different state (even if I haven't worked my way up to trying the experiment locally, the fact I've tried the experiment in my travels is a sign of progress...not much has come of it though). Staying at a bar until the wee hours of the evening, on the other hand, that's the type of thing I'm talking about when I say the bar scene would be miserable for me.

There's also the hurdle of not having a wingman.
 

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
645
You have a valid point here. OP has poor social skills in general. There are scenarios with neurotypicals having poor social skills too.

In general, Generation Z (1997-2012 births) is known for having subpar social skills. The median Gen Z person has weaker social skills than predecessor generations.

Generation Y/Millennials (1981-1996 births) started the trend of poorer social skills with the 1990s-2000s era advances in technology. As the Millennial generation went along, social skills got diminished. Even earlier Millennials (1981-1986 births) often have weaker social skills than Baby Boomers or Generation X.

In the USA and other developed nations, there are now nearly 2 full adult generations who have been more likely to have subpar social skills. The growth in technology has been a large part in that.



It is common for neurotypical men to misread cues. It's not a pleasant experience for a neurotypical man to have that happen.

I think there is a difference in how a neurotypical reacts to a social cue misread as compared to how an autist reacts to one.
You're right, technology has led to a worsening of social skills in general (even among neurotypicals). One of the receptionists in my condo building was born in 99. She's commented before about what bad social skills men her age have.

I suppose being an early 90s baby (as opposed to a late 90s baby) is one saving grace. Imagine how much worse my social skills would be if in addition to being an autist, I was also born in 99 (Even though 8 years might not sound like a huge difference, starting high school in 2005 was a much different experience than starting high school in 2013 would have been)

Neurotypical men react differently to a misreading of cues because it doesn't happen as often. Even with how bad the social skills of men born in 99 are (as the receptionist in my condo building said), a neurotypical man born in 99 probably misreads cues at a lower rate than me. Hell, even my cousin who was born in 07 (which means he just graduated high school) was able to easily get a prom date earlier this year.
 

Sega Genesis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Messages
814
Reaction score
569
One particularly noteworthy example of a misread cue was when a girl from my college mentioned (during a meeting for an extracurricular group I belonged to) she had an IUD so she could have casual sex without getting pregnant. I thought the fact she made that comment in my presence was a cue that she was open to casual sex with me. So I approached her after class one day and proposed we be casual sex partners. That's the level of social ineptitude we're talking about.

A neurotypical 14 year old boy might think a girl wants sex with him just because she talked about sex in his presence. A neurotypical 20 year old, on the other hand, would know better than to propose a girl become his casual sex partner just because she talked about sex in his presence.
Re bolded do you mean a non-neurotypical 20 year old would know better...

In any event...

The fact you're even aware of all this^^ reflects a remarkable adeptness and self-awareness @GoodMan32.

Is that typical? That an autist can be so self-aware, but yet at a loss or too fearful to take the necessary steps to do anything about it?

I mean take BE's husband who is also neurotypical/an autist.

He has learned to socialize and quite well! He met BE at a club! And she's beautiful! Although he still struggles in certain areas. So I assume somewhat high on the spectrum.

I dunno @GoodMan32 you did things like play sports in HS (track and cross-country?).

You obviously socialized with others back then. Not very well (which is not uncommon for many people in HS), but you still did.

So, imo you're certainly capable of doing so again and improving IF you wanted to. Given you're LOW on the spectrum.

Yes? No?

Do you want to? Are you happy this way?

Just asking...

I'll stop posting after this because admittedly I'm not all that familiar with the disorder and it's all quite confusing to me.

So I'll sign off this thread and wish you luck.
 
Last edited:

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
645
You are reading into things that don't exist.



I'm saying that it can be difficult for outsiders to see the difference between a poorly socialized autist and a poorly socialized neurotypical.

Additionally, in the mating environment, getting a shredded physique is the best thing that either a poorly socialized autist or a poorly socialized neurotypical can do to improve outcomes.

Personality matters less than looks.
You're right when you say it can be difficult for outsiders to see the difference between a poorly-socialized autist and a poorly-socialized neurotypical.

With a case of autism as mild as mine, many in the outside world probably think I'm simply strange (as opposed to being an autist)

I know the topic of gymcels has come up on the forum before. I'd like to hear your take on why gymcels exist.

If getting a shredded physique is enough to offset a subpar personality, gymcels wouldn't exist, right?
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
12,527
There's also the hurdle of not having a wingman.
That's a legitimate hurdle. Men who lack wings for nightgame are best focusing on non-bar approaching or social circle game.

Most men who lack wings end up trying to compensate through heavy amounts of swiping. It usually doesn't end well.

bars are a miserable environment for an autist (most autists at least). It's unfortunate how some of the top environments to find a partner just so happen to be miserable for autists (bars, night clubs, parties, etc). "Bar" is a vague term. For example, I have no problem with eating dinner at the bar when I'm visiting a different state (even if I haven't worked my way up to trying the experiment locally, the fact I've tried the experiment in my travels is a sign of progress...not much has come of it though). Staying at a bar until the wee hours of the evening, on the other hand, that's the type of thing I'm talking about when I say the bar scene would be miserable for me.
I think the majority of neurotypicals don't like bar approaching either. The typical mindset for the neurotypical who approaches in bars is to tolerate it long enough to find a girlfriend. The median neurotypical in a bar isn't a fucckboi. He's a guy looking for a girlfriend so he doesn't have to approach in bars anymore.

Online dating websites were invented in the 1990s to serve as an alternative to the negative aspects of the post Sexual Revolution bar scene (think 1970s-1990s).

There are different type of bars/nightlife venues. Some bars will be better for approaching whereas some bars are better for existing social groups or first dates. Figuring that out beforehand can be a challenge. Some internet review sites will help to an extent with this but it is a matter of firsthand experience.

Read this specific review for an example of aspects that make a bar bad for meeting new people. Bars that are good for meeting new people aren't known for their food service (it's ideal if food service is limited), have mostly people standing, and do not have overly loud music.


There are guys who can arrange first dates without going to bars to meet new people or without swiping. They are either doing it through their social circles or approaching people in non-bar venues like grocery stores, bookstores, and gyms.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top