"The Kiss of Death Mistake"

You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?

Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.

One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.

Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Read more...

Wow. Just... wow.

loveshogun

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
719
Reaction score
35
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_uRIMUBnvw

"Based on the "Manifesto for Conscious Men," a collectively-written document from a number of men who feel that a new definition of masculinity can help redress the imbalances of patriarchy and welcome a new era of loving appreciation between men and women. A group of these men speak from the heart and offer a collective apology, on behalf of their gender, for past abuses of men against women."

Discuss. I can't even process my reaction right now. My brain broke.
 

“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

vatoloco

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
65
loveshogun said:
I can't. I just ate and I literally felt sick to my stomach trying to watch that. *barf* I took about 20 seconds and had to close the window. Is there an executive summary?
 

loveshogun

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
719
Reaction score
35
Assuming women are in peril, is this what they really need? Is it even something they want?

I think these guys have a serious case of "It will make me feel better about myself to do this, so it must be right."

Basically, the same kind of thinking that leads a guy into thinking that "I like her, so there MUST be a way to make her like me."

Which, to me, is the epitome of underhanded back dealing and a breakdown of personal integrity on a grave scale. The worst kinds of selfish people are the ones who don't realize how selfish they are.

This kind of video is nothing new to me. It's just the audacity and boldness of making such a sweeping statement is so uncharacteristic of apologists and those lacking spines that my brain literally farted right out of my skull when I heard the first five sentences.
 

Wolfgang D

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
240
Reaction score
23
loveshogun said:
A group of these men speak from the heart and offer a collective apology, on behalf of their gender, for past abuses of men against women.
Wait. Isn't it "prejudice" to think there are some general traits for groups that make them groups? This line here goes even further. It actually says there is guilt that passes from one individual in the group to another, even when he hasn't even done anything. Even when the first individual was born and lived long ago, I still carry the guilt for whatever he did.

Is it the same for women? In that case every person in the world should get the death penalty.

And another thing: why aren't we ever allowed to say anything about the good things men do? Of course men commit more crimes than women. Men do EVERYTHING more than women. Women are average in every measurable mental field, like IQ, linguistic ability, mathematical ability, and so on. Men are more spread up and down the scale. That means there are more men who are idiots, but also more men who are geniuses. That means the best writers, doctors, engineers, musicians, inventors, managers and leaders will always be mostly men.

The species does what serves its survival. If a tribe or people hadn't done so, it would have lost out in the competition to those who did. If men took the high positions there was evolutionary sense in doing so.

That doesn't mean that deserving women haven't been allowed up there. Maybe not all the deserving ones - the instinct that makes us recognize men as the best leaders could shut out some worthy women, the application of instinct isn't always perfect. But it happens. Cleopatra, Boudica, Victoria, Elizabeth. Yes, during the "past abuses of men by women," men named the most successful era in the most successful empire the Victorian Era. They worshipped a female leader, Queen Victoria.

And before that a nation followed Joan of Arc to victory in Europe's longest war.

If they didn't put more female generals in place in that war, it wasn't because of "sexism." They would have done it if it had helped them win. They didn't follow more female leaders, because Joan of Arc was an exception that they acknowledged, but aside from her men made the best generals.
 

"She's Out of Your League"

You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.

Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.

She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.

Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.

Read more...

vatoloco

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
65
Okay, I forced myself to watch it and I gotta say, what a fucking joke!

1. New Age-y shit
2. Speaking with a pseudo-soothing voice
3. Lens flare here and there
4. ????
5. PROFIT!

Classical Nice Guy: "Oh, I'm so sorry for everything. I'm gonna worship you like a goddess. Can we fuck now?"

;)
 
Top