MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 12,738
- Reaction score
- 5,156
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Well, I wasn't going looking for men I could mogCorrection: The one "negro" would be cucking these dudes' wives and daughters.
Seriously tho, how much time do you have on your hands to be judging yourself against the height of men on a ship like 300 years ago?
Wow, this chick has had an incredibly horrific experience, and she thinks that the absolute worst part of it was being forced to marry a short man.![]()
Last line..
I remember once visiting the neighborhood that A-Dam is most famous for, and there was a chick that didn't want to accept me as a client for one stayShe had to choose between prostitution ('entertaining' guests in a bar) and marriage to an ugly man. I think she chose the lesser of two evils.![]()
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
A real useful job produces enought wealth to support those who perform it and their families as long as there are no parasites in the middle (gov especially).The average height on that list is really interesting, but I'm more shocked at the professions.
Family sizes were 2-4x bigger back then. Imagine being able to support that by just making rope during the day. That sounds insane in 2024.
If people only did useful work everyone could have their needs met (supporting a family of 4 or whatever the case may be) while working only half of what they do now.A real useful job produces enought wealth to support those who perform it and their families as long as there are no parasites in the middle (gov especially).
If there werent parasites wheter public actors, welfare leechers or "middle men" even nowadays a plumber could easily support a family of 4.
Interesting theory but likely false. Fun fact: Europeans living in the early Middle Ages (i.e. about 1,000 years ago) were nearly as tall as modern humans. Then, for several hundred years, the average height of Europeans was actually in decline. The lowest point was the 1700's - exactly when those French settlers described in the article came to North America. Afterwards, average height started going up again. The reason for this? Changes in nutrition. It also explains why native Americans were taller than European settlers in the colonial era. The natives had more protein in their diet.This fits in with my theory that tall men have become lopsidedly more prolific at reproduction, as Western society has allowed women sexual choice.![]()
Do you have any study for that? it makes sense the protein talk but not in that time.Interesting theory but likely false. Fun fact: Europeans living in the early Middle Ages (i.e. about 1,000 years ago) were nearly as tall as modern humans. Then, for several hundred years, the average height of Europeans was actually in decline. The lowest point was the 1700's - exactly when those French settlers described in the article came to North America. Afterwards, average height started going up again. The reason for this? Changes in nutrition. It also explains why native Americans were taller than European settlers in the colonial era. The natives had more protein in their diet.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
Do you have any study for that? it makes sense the protein talk but not in that time.
The early mid age was the 5th century right after the collapse of the west roman empire not 1000 yrs ago.
He talks about climate changes within a certain time frame.![]()
Men From Early Middle Ages Were Nearly As Tall As Modern People
Northern European men living during the early Middle Ages were nearly as tall as their modern-day American descendants, a finding that defies conventional wisdom about progress in living standards during the last millennium.www.sciencedaily.com
They are talking about the period between 9th and 11th century AD, which straddles both early and high Middle Ages, but that's not the point.
I just hired a plumber. These days, they aren't poor!A real useful job produces enought wealth to support those who perform it and their families as long as there are no parasites in the middle (gov especially).
If there werent parasites wheter public actors, welfare leechers or "middle men" even nowadays a plumber could easily support a family of 4.
Correct. The year 1124 is considered "High Middle Ages". Historians basically consider the High Middle Ages to be the years of the (numbered) Crusades, which was the overwhelming meme of that era.Do you have any study for that? it makes sense the protein talk but not in that time.
The early mid age was the 5th century right after the collapse of the west roman empire not 1000 yrs ago.
The Alpha Gaul got mogged in that.Ok, I see why this paper was published now. Same reason as the article on marriage stats discussed in this video. It's a "careerist" study.
It's like a Roman warlord needing a prophecy that suggests victory in Gaul is in Rome's future. Lo and behold, a short while later one of the most respected oracles looks into the tea leaves and what does she see? Roman soldiers celebrating a new annexation.
en.wikipedia.org
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Hi MDJ,I just hired a plumber. These days, they aren't poor!