"She's Out of Your League"

You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.

Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.

She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.

Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.

Read more...

Wikipedia is dead to me.

AureliusMaximus

AureliusMaximus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
2,671
Location
Denmark
Wikipedia was great idea but now have tuned into a non trustable source of information.

Now the co-founder too admits that:
Wikipedia Co-Founder Criticizes Site, Says It Has Slid Into ‘Leftist Propaganda.
www.theepochtimes.com

Wikipedia Co-Founder Criticizes Site, Says It Has Slid Into ‘Leftist Propaganda’

Larry Sanger criticized Wikipedia, suggesting that it has recently moved to “follow the news media.”
www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com

Even more:
www.foxnews.com

Inside Wikipedia's leftist bias: socialism pages whitewashed, communist atrocities buried

Big tech is under fire for bias and censorship, but one outlet has escaped much scrutiny: Wikipedia.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
www.breitbart.com

Wikipedia Foundation Approves Leftist ‘Code of Conduct’

The Wikimedia Foundation, which owns Wikipedia, announced last week that its Board of Trustees has approved a new “code of conduct” for the site and its affiliated sites. Plans for a code of conduct had been announced last year and an early draft pushing left-wing identity politics submitted for...
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
https://www.republicworld.com/techn...ust-it-wikipedia-co-founder-larry-sanger.html
www.dailymail.co.uk

'Nobody should trust Wikipedia,' co-founder Larry Sanger warns

Larry Sanger (left), 53, co-founded Wikipedia in 2001 alongside Jimmy Wales, said the crowdsourcing project has betrayed its original mission by reflecting the views of the 'establishment.'
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

In other words; don't believe anything that is written on Wikipedia as they censor, lie and cheat and cover up anything to fit their agenda..

Buy a real encyclopedia instead which is trustable source of information and all where information has been verified through multiple sources.
 
Last edited:

"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.

For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.

Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.

The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.

Read more...

FlexpertHamilton

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
3,150
Reaction score
3,666
Location
US
Wikipedia has always been a joke, I only ever used it for basic information. I've definitely noticed this trend over the years though.

Anyone who thinks it's an authority (or who think authority = truth) are morons anyway.
 
FlexpertHamilton

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
3,150
Reaction score
3,666
Location
US
EyeBRollin said:
The OP posts biased opinion pieces from right-wing propaganda websites calling Wikipedia “biased.”

Classic.
Click to expand...
Well no ****, why would any leftist websites acknowledge that Wikipedia was taken over by leftists?
 

"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"

Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.

She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.

Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.

So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.

The words come later. The impression comes first.

Read more...

E

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
FlexpertHamilton said:
Well no ****, why would any leftist websites acknowledge that Wikipedia was taken over by leftists?
Click to expand...
A credible allegation would be from a non-partisan fact checker or media evaluation organization. A right wing blog calling Wikipedia “left wing” has no credibility. The pot calling the kettle black…
 
AureliusMaximus

AureliusMaximus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
2,671
Location
Denmark
FlexpertHamilton said:
Wikipedia has always been a joke, I only ever used it for basic information. I've definitely noticed this trend over the years though.

Anyone who thinks it's an authority (or who think authority = truth) are morons anyway.
Click to expand...
Well in the past it could at least be used to check some non vital/non critial information, but these days its a total joke and useless.

Many people do still use it though because they think it is a creditble sournce which it is not.
People need to stop using and referring to it.
 
Last edited:
AureliusMaximus

AureliusMaximus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
2,671
Location
Denmark
Clee Torres said:
I agree; it's disheartening witnessing everything slip into this leftist SJW nonsense.

However, I don't think anyone should've been using Wiki as an entirely trusted resource in the first place if I'm honest. I only ever used Wiki for trivial things like reviewing an NBA players' biography or some ****. I'm also guilty of having trolled several pages with nonsense material just for a cheap laugh.
Click to expand...
Same.
I used it the same way in the past, but now it is almost not worhty of that even anymore.
 

"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"

Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.

She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.

Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.

So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.

The words come later. The impression comes first.

Read more...

A

Alvafe

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
3,361
Reaction score
1,594
Age
43
actaully wikipedia was never trusted, you can take as a extra source but you will need to confirm it even more, hell if you ever had to do a paper in college you know very well no one would let you put anything if you linked wikipedia as a source of anything

again guys its internet, you need to learn to collect info and search for at least 3 sources before you think maybe its right, that is what freedom is you are free to tell the truth and lie, with is a better option then having people choose what you should know and not,
 

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

FlexpertHamilton

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
3,150
Reaction score
3,666
Location
US
EyeBRollin said:
No. Fox News / Breitbart calling someone biased is like a fat person telling others how to lose weight.
Click to expand...
The point is that there is no unbiased source of news or information generally. The only people who get into journalism/reporting are ones with an agenda.
 
E

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
FlexpertHamilton said:
The point is that there is no unbiased source of news or information generally. The only people who get into journalism/reporting are ones with an agenda.
Click to expand...
No. There are sources with minimal political bias that skew towards the objective truth. Those sources are not “left wing” because they contradict Fox News and Breitbart.

Stuffnu said:
Regardless of political viewpoints. Bias will always lean towards the source of there paycheck.
Click to expand...
Non-profit sources are biased towards..?
 

"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.

For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.

Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.

The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.

Read more...

You must log in or register to reply here.
22 Rules for Massive Success With Women
Top