Why "Whatever You Want" Keeps You Single

She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.

You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.

The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.

Read more...

Wikipedia is dead to me.

AureliusMaximus

AureliusMaximus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
2,671
Location
Denmark
Wikipedia was great idea but now have tuned into a non trustable source of information.

Now the co-founder too admits that:
Wikipedia Co-Founder Criticizes Site, Says It Has Slid Into ‘Leftist Propaganda.
www.theepochtimes.com

Wikipedia Co-Founder Criticizes Site, Says It Has Slid Into ‘Leftist Propaganda’

Larry Sanger criticized Wikipedia, suggesting that it has recently moved to “follow the news media.”
www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com

Even more:
www.foxnews.com

Inside Wikipedia's leftist bias: socialism pages whitewashed, communist atrocities buried

Big tech is under fire for bias and censorship, but one outlet has escaped much scrutiny: Wikipedia.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
www.breitbart.com

Wikipedia Foundation Approves Leftist ‘Code of Conduct’

The Wikimedia Foundation, which owns Wikipedia, announced last week that its Board of Trustees has approved a new “code of conduct” for the site and its affiliated sites. Plans for a code of conduct had been announced last year and an early draft pushing left-wing identity politics submitted for...
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
https://www.republicworld.com/techn...ust-it-wikipedia-co-founder-larry-sanger.html
www.dailymail.co.uk

'Nobody should trust Wikipedia,' co-founder Larry Sanger warns

Larry Sanger (left), 53, co-founded Wikipedia in 2001 alongside Jimmy Wales, said the crowdsourcing project has betrayed its original mission by reflecting the views of the 'establishment.'
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

In other words; don't believe anything that is written on Wikipedia as they censor, lie and cheat and cover up anything to fit their agenda..

Buy a real encyclopedia instead which is trustable source of information and all where information has been verified through multiple sources.
 
Last edited:

“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

FlexpertHamilton

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
3,150
Reaction score
3,666
Location
US
Wikipedia has always been a joke, I only ever used it for basic information. I've definitely noticed this trend over the years though.

Anyone who thinks it's an authority (or who think authority = truth) are morons anyway.
 
FlexpertHamilton

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
3,150
Reaction score
3,666
Location
US
EyeBRollin said:
The OP posts biased opinion pieces from right-wing propaganda websites calling Wikipedia “biased.”

Classic.
Click to expand...
Well no ****, why would any leftist websites acknowledge that Wikipedia was taken over by leftists?
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

E

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
FlexpertHamilton said:
Well no ****, why would any leftist websites acknowledge that Wikipedia was taken over by leftists?
Click to expand...
A credible allegation would be from a non-partisan fact checker or media evaluation organization. A right wing blog calling Wikipedia “left wing” has no credibility. The pot calling the kettle black…
 
AureliusMaximus

AureliusMaximus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
2,671
Location
Denmark
FlexpertHamilton said:
Wikipedia has always been a joke, I only ever used it for basic information. I've definitely noticed this trend over the years though.

Anyone who thinks it's an authority (or who think authority = truth) are morons anyway.
Click to expand...
Well in the past it could at least be used to check some non vital/non critial information, but these days its a total joke and useless.

Many people do still use it though because they think it is a creditble sournce which it is not.
People need to stop using and referring to it.
 
Last edited:
AureliusMaximus

AureliusMaximus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
2,671
Location
Denmark
Clee Torres said:
I agree; it's disheartening witnessing everything slip into this leftist SJW nonsense.

However, I don't think anyone should've been using Wiki as an entirely trusted resource in the first place if I'm honest. I only ever used Wiki for trivial things like reviewing an NBA players' biography or some ****. I'm also guilty of having trolled several pages with nonsense material just for a cheap laugh.
Click to expand...
Same.
I used it the same way in the past, but now it is almost not worhty of that even anymore.
 

"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

A

Alvafe

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
3,361
Reaction score
1,594
Age
43
actaully wikipedia was never trusted, you can take as a extra source but you will need to confirm it even more, hell if you ever had to do a paper in college you know very well no one would let you put anything if you linked wikipedia as a source of anything

again guys its internet, you need to learn to collect info and search for at least 3 sources before you think maybe its right, that is what freedom is you are free to tell the truth and lie, with is a better option then having people choose what you should know and not,
 

"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"

Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.

She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.

Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.

So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.

The words come later. The impression comes first.

Read more...

FlexpertHamilton

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
3,150
Reaction score
3,666
Location
US
EyeBRollin said:
No. Fox News / Breitbart calling someone biased is like a fat person telling others how to lose weight.
Click to expand...
The point is that there is no unbiased source of news or information generally. The only people who get into journalism/reporting are ones with an agenda.
 
E

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
FlexpertHamilton said:
The point is that there is no unbiased source of news or information generally. The only people who get into journalism/reporting are ones with an agenda.
Click to expand...
No. There are sources with minimal political bias that skew towards the objective truth. Those sources are not “left wing” because they contradict Fox News and Breitbart.

Stuffnu said:
Regardless of political viewpoints. Bias will always lean towards the source of there paycheck.
Click to expand...
Non-profit sources are biased towards..?
 

"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

You must log in or register to reply here.
22 Rules for Massive Success With Women
Top