"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Why worry about women when we have Robots?
- Thread starter WORKEROUTER
- Start date
"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
I guess you could technically declare a vibrator a robot and say women are already having sex with Robots. But this whole notion of having a robot mimic a human and form an emotional romantic relationship reeks of:
1) complete and total ****ing retardation
2) complete and total ****ing social retardation
3) massive amounts of LSD
1) complete and total ****ing retardation
2) complete and total ****ing social retardation
3) massive amounts of LSD
WORKEROUTER
Master Don Juan
Does it? If it was possible to create a robotic being with a highly developed response system that basically mimicked a humans' response system, and it was basically BELIEVABLY HUMAN, would it be okay?
reminds me of an Old Buffy episode where some Fine azz sex robots are created one of them just like Buffy and Spike Fvcks the **** out of it all the time. ....i wish i had a sexbot... all the woman without the drama and *****yness
“The 22 Psychological Triggers That Make Women Chase You… Starting Tonight”
Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.
I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.
Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules. Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.
Can't imagine a machine having a vagina that feels indistinguishable from a woman.
I think more likely though in the future will be designer children who have features picked by their parents just like you'd pick options on a car. Intelligence, height, good looks, eye color, athleticism, etc. The technology for this stuff probably exists already, if not, then it's right around the corner.
I think more likely though in the future will be designer children who have features picked by their parents just like you'd pick options on a car. Intelligence, height, good looks, eye color, athleticism, etc. The technology for this stuff probably exists already, if not, then it's right around the corner.
Rebound Material
Master Don Juan
i could just see 90% or not ALL AFC's relying on this sh!t.
"She's Out of Your League"
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
bigjohnson
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 2,438
- Reaction score
- 38
I can see our homes full of non-humanoid robots in the relatively near future. We already have the iRobot Roomba and other cleaning 'droids, and if you get right down to it the common dishwasher is really a robot as much as any industrial robot is.
The next thing might well be huge companies like FedEx fielding fleets of autonomous delivery bots, trucks that drive themselves and some sort of gizmo to bring out the goods.
Within 40 years I bet I have a robotic maid, but I don't think "she" will look good in a skirt. With all those pieces in place though there's no reason a pretty decent human facsimile couldn't be your maid-bot, and it's a pretty short step from there to "let's see how realistic this maid is" after a little too much tequila I suppose.
I wonder if that means I can get a backrub without a bunch of complaining?
*shrug*
The next thing might well be huge companies like FedEx fielding fleets of autonomous delivery bots, trucks that drive themselves and some sort of gizmo to bring out the goods.
Within 40 years I bet I have a robotic maid, but I don't think "she" will look good in a skirt. With all those pieces in place though there's no reason a pretty decent human facsimile couldn't be your maid-bot, and it's a pretty short step from there to "let's see how realistic this maid is" after a little too much tequila I suppose.
I wonder if that means I can get a backrub without a bunch of complaining?
*shrug*
g g g unit
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2005
- Messages
- 233
- Reaction score
- 1
who the fvck wants to bone a sewing machine????
bigjohnson
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 2,438
- Reaction score
- 38
Nah, I don't want to end up giving half my stuff and the house to a maid-bot. 
But once it's an almost perfect simulation of a person I can see a lot of guys with a house full of "maids".
But once it's an almost perfect simulation of a person I can see a lot of guys with a house full of "maids".