What exactly is Brexit?

R

Ranger

Guest
Why doesn't Texas secede from the US?
Texas vs White ruled that a state cannot sucede from the Union. At one time a state could prior to the civil war.
It was originally the intent of the constitution that if the government becomes oppressive that a state could declare its sovereignty.

Subtracting the British and the Bank of England’s initial use of the colonies as a means of slavery for exports, namely cotton, the south was just in succeeding from the Union.
The mistake was P.T. Beauregard firing on Fort Sumpter. Had the south not fired in a federal position things would have been different.
 
Read the 22 Rules for Massive Success with Women. Everything you need to know to become a huge success with women. And it's free!

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
2,879
Reaction score
1,189
Age
30
There are no such things as "refugee crysis" only wrong border control policies, anyway yes this whole mass migration from third world countries got the brits to vote for brexit and the italians to vote against the gov in the last referendum.

Anytime the people is given the choice they say they dont want immigrants especially because migrations to Europe come from muslim countries, and as a european I can say we dont need any more, we instead need to kick out plenty of those already here.

Not because of "race" but because they are a pain in the ass with their culture which is not compatible to ours and because in terms of welfare they suck more than they provide.

Any european country when called to vote, votes like this thats why the european commission gets butt hurt only to hear the word "public vote"...they themselves are not elected from anyone, the european parliament which is somehow elected has in fact no virtual power.
If you want to stop immigration from Muslim countries tell the white people in your country to have more babies.
 
R

Ranger

Guest
“Socialist agenda” is just right wing slogan. White people need to have more babies is simple economic math. A declining population is a declining economy.
Bull$hit. I’m not right wing. I’m just really good at math.
Government doesn’t get smaller. They are in the business of making victims.
 
Read the 22 Rules for Massive Success with Women. Everything you need to know to become a huge success with women. And it's free!

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
7,142
Reaction score
5,670
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
There’s a fundamental reason. That is a question of e inimical sovereignty.
By tying all the economies together, banking can more easily control the production in Europe or so they thought.

What really happens is that countries with poor GNP are a huge drain on the better producers. It’s a major step in socialism to tie all the production of the world together.
Obama was concerned with it as a setback to his world agenda.
This and also a greater sphere of influence to ensure long term viability.
 

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
7,142
Reaction score
5,670
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
“Socialist agenda” is just a right wing pejoritive for uncomfortable truths. White people need to have more babies is simple economic math. A declining population is a declining economy.
You guys gotta realise that left or right wing ideology by itself doesn't fvcking work in the long run.

It's the fusion of both or more correctly it must be in the form politics of development.
 

touma.akagi

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
224
Reaction score
89
Location
Salt Lake City
Britain had a referendum/vote to leave the EU (European Union). The vote to leave won even though all mainstream media, actors, singers, and even Obama went over to Britain to campaign for Britain to stay in the EU. Apparently Obama made some threats that if Britain left the EU, there would be world war 3.
Blaming Brexit for WW III...
Underfunding our US Military
Doubling the national debt
Keeps going back and forth between criticizing Trump and take credit for his improvements to our country
"Nobody in my administration got indicted!"

Obama was without a doubt the most mediocre US President that we've ever had. And that didn't even hit me like a brick until recently what with Obamacare being ruled unconstitutional, this man accomplished little, possibly even nothing, in his eight years as President that benefitted our country. The ship's direction has been reversed, and he's got nothing left to show for it. Pathetic.

And he just keeps digging himself deeper into the hole with those public appearances. Mr. Obama, please shut up. Go enjoy your retirement benefits and play golf.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
5,316
Reaction score
2,833
If you want to stop immigration from Muslim countries tell the white people in your country to have more babies.
I said third world and muslims not non-whites...you NPCs hardly can control yourself before throwing your lines? its all scripted after all.

I explicitly said its not a race issue, actually I would trade 1 million leftist NPCs for 1 million chineses everyday to have them in Europe.
 
Read the 22 Rules for Massive Success with Women. Everything you need to know to become a huge success with women. And it's free!

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,669
Reaction score
1,692
Damn such a long time ago yet forgot to answer you, well decisions in europe come from the european commission which is not voted directly from the citizens, plus a number of "commissioners" which again are not voted from the people...if you need an example of a former president of the european commission think of jose barroso which "somehow" got a top management job at goldman sachs...what a coincidence.

Regarding countries who chosed a governemnt which disagrees with europe (see italy, hungary currently) they often resort to financial warfare to attack them, open threats about those countries being "unstable" till they get back in line.

Great post.

This is somewhat modeled after the Federal / State setup where the Federal Government can withold funds from States when they do not do as they are told.
 
Last edited:

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,669
Reaction score
1,692
Texas vs White ruled that a state cannot sucede from the Union. At one time a state could prior to the civil war.
It was originally the intent of the constitution that if the government becomes oppressive that a state could declare its sovereignty.

Subtracting the British and the Bank of England’s initial use of the colonies as a means of slavery for exports, namely cotton, the south was just in succeeding from the Union.
The mistake was P.T. Beauregard firing on Fort Sumpter. Had the south not fired in a federal position things would have been different.
Some additional facts here are needed.

Lincoln agreed to vacate Sumter, but lied. He sent a fleet to reinforce it instead, but they were unable to enter the port due to a storm.

Knowing this was a key location for the South, they were faced with the decision to conquer the fort before it was reinforced, or to allow Lincoln's lie to move ahead. They chose to take the fort.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
2,879
Reaction score
1,189
Age
30
I said third world and muslims not non-whites...you NPCs hardly can control yourself before throwing your lines? its all scripted after all.

I explicitly said its not a race issue, actually I would trade 1 million leftist NPCs for 1 million chineses everyday to have them in Europe.
It is a race issue. Predominately white countries of the west are require immigration because the birth rates are too low. Replacement is 2.1 babies per woman. This is simple math. If you don't reach replacement rate, your country requires immigration to make up the difference lest it has longer term economic decline. You can howl all you want about Muslim immigrants but your country will continue to need them unless white people start having more babies.
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,669
Reaction score
1,692
It is a race issue. Predominately white countries of the west are require immigration because the birth rates are too low. Replacement is 2.1 babies per woman. This is simple math. If you don't reach replacement rate, your country requires immigration to make up the difference lest it has longer term economic decline. You can howl all you want about Muslim immigrants but your country will continue to need them unless white people start having more babies.

It requires nothing.

You are making the argument that it is ok to destroy cultures for the economy.

That is just ridiculous.
 
R

Ranger

Guest
It requires nothing.

You are making the argument that it is ok to destroy cultures for the economy.

That is just ridiculous.
Especially since the Muslims destroyed one of the greatest contributors to science and the rise of civilization. The Pursian empire.
Muslims have contributed nothing to the world. It against their laws.
 
Read the 22 Rules for Massive Success with Women. Everything you need to know to become a huge success with women. And it's free!

samspade

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
5,640
Reaction score
1,840
I don't know but Breggsit would be a good name for an English breakfast at Denny's.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
5,316
Reaction score
2,833
It is a race issue. Predominately white countries of the west are require immigration because the birth rates are too low. Replacement is 2.1 babies per woman. This is simple math. If you don't reach replacement rate, your country requires immigration to make up the difference lest it has longer term economic decline. You can howl all you want about Muslim immigrants but your country will continue to need them unless white people start having more babies.
From an economic point of view whatever entered europe from africa and middle east in the last 15 years didnt help at all to boost the growth, actually the amount of welfare they costed plus the amount of cost in terms of crime rate/jails/courts strongly outbalance any dream pro migration people support.

Plain and simple they cost more than what they provide and while they do it, they decrease the overall health and wealth condition of their host countries, and Im using the term host not because english is not my first language but because I see a parallel with the animal world where someone is basically a parasite to someone else while destroying the same ground that feed them.

I also dont believe in the "make more kids to be safe" line, with aumatization and modern technologies it takes less and less workers by the years while resources and pollution are a big problem, if Europe could control the slow decrease in population it would surely be better....also keep in mind most souther euro countries have a double digit youth unemployment and the last thing it takes are third worlders with no culture or will to work.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
15,611
Reaction score
3,750
Age
43
Location
midwestern cow field 40
What jobs do immigrants work in Europe? In the US, we have a largely agricultural economy. Migrant workers pick fruit and vegetables, and work in slaughterhouses. These jobs are difficult to fill, and if they paid a wage that would be enough to make an American take that job, then labor costs would skyrocket.
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,669
Reaction score
1,692
What jobs do immigrants work in Europe? In the US, we have a largely agricultural economy. Migrant workers pick fruit and vegetables, and work in slaughterhouses. These jobs are difficult to fill, and if they paid a wage that would be enough to make an American take that job, then labor costs would skyrocket.
So why is it a problem if the labor costs went up? Those jobs used to be done by college kids in the summer....if the wages were high enough they would come back agaim.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
5,316
Reaction score
2,833
What jobs do immigrants work in Europe? In the US, we have a largely agricultural economy. Migrant workers pick fruit and vegetables, and work in slaughterhouses. These jobs are difficult to fill, and if they paid a wage that would be enough to make an American take that job, then labor costs would skyrocket.
Its hard to answer to your question for two reasons, you talk about "immigrants" as if they are an homogeneous group.

First we have to differentiate between intraeuropean immigration (polish moving to uk for example) where what you say may apply, basically doing cheap job at a cheap pay which is however more than they could get in their country from immigration outside Europe.

Secondly we have to differentiate between first generation immigrants, their sons and their grandsons; in this case it works the opposite of the US where you got first generation immigrants to be hard to integrate than slowly and slowly they became americans (think of italians there).

In Europe we got turkish or northern africans back then trying to fit while now their grandsons are those who basically turned london (togheter with new wave africans/middle easterns/southeast asian) into a battle field of stabbing and acid attacks, from 2013 till last year we got hundres of thousands of illegal coming from the mediterranean and the eastern route from the balcans too.

There are areas in sweden with sharia law and the police basically not allowed to get inside, I guess these are joy of multiculturalism leftists love so much.

Btw keep in mind youth unemployment is high in many european countries right now.

So why is it a problem if the labor costs went up? Those jobs used to be done by college kids in the summer....if the wages were high enough they would come back agaim.
Good point, clearly no coincidence that youth unemployment is very high in the 16-25 age group for less educated locals.

Even poor teens looking for support to pay their studies basically have no convenience at those salaries.
 
Top