“The 22 Psychological Triggers That Make Women Chase You… Starting Tonight”
Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.
I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.
Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules. Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.
What does it say about you when you cannot attract quality women?
- Thread starter DemFeeelz
- Start date
christoff522
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2014
- Messages
- 223
- Reaction score
- 36
Hey bro welcome to the forums. It can mean many things.DemFeeelz said:
It can mean you're lazy, put no effort into pulling and go for the easy option.
It can mean you have low self esteem, maybe that you're attracting people who reflect what you feel about you.
It can mean you've had issues from childhood, co-dependency, abuse, family members with certain illnesses that you seek out later in life.
It can also bring into question the definition of a quality woman. That definition is subjective in itself.
It usually means you're an AFC with a lot of work ahead of you. It's not society's fault, if you have an issue it's always best to focus the work and effort onto you, self-examination is always the way. You can only control you, you can only change you. I think it was Nelson Mandela who said "Be the change that you want to see in the world".
( . )( . )
Banned
Not to take away your passive aggressive way of shaming inept chodes under account number 300, but lets not forget yougogrrrrl-ism and the Western obesity epidemic has drastically altered the dating landscape and basically culled a good 80-ish? (We all know it's more, but I'm being generous for the sake of arguments) percent of the female population as viable options in regards to quality.DemFeeelz said:
Even if every man all of a sudden became a uber alfa who would rather slit his wrists than ever say a negative word about Western women like you pretend to be, the numbers just aren't there to reciprocate. The math just literally wouldn't add up.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
The solutions for those of you who are unable to attract or keep quality women are:
1) Sex tourisim.
2) Continue to chase BPD, AWing, Alcoholic slutts till they are drunk enough to see the quality in you.
3) Finally come out of the closet.
4) MGTOW.
1) Sex tourisim.
2) Continue to chase BPD, AWing, Alcoholic slutts till they are drunk enough to see the quality in you.
3) Finally come out of the closet.
4) MGTOW.
5) Read Zarky's blog: http://matingmarket.wordpress.com/DemFeeelz said:
( . )( . )
Banned
Mad? I've got her flipping out in under 3 posts before. I'll let the "Yall hate da wimminz !!! :box: " naturally evolve this time.jimmy18 said:
( . )( . )
Banned
Whilst I agree the Kenyan commies ineptitude has been off the chain, I think our social/cultural re-engineering goes a bit deeper than some sh!tlib experiment who may or may not have a penchant for sucking ****s in Chicago bathhouses.jurry said:
Yea I dont really do partisan politics, suffice it to say almost no one in congress or the white house has any interest in the welfare of the everyday US citizen. Check out MMT and moslereconomics.com, contrary to what youve said our levels of debt are actually too low for the economys need right now.( . )( . ) said:
( . )( . )
Banned
jurry said:
A rather odd thing for a lib to say considering the last 5 decades has been run on a feeeelz based strategy. They didn't exactly capture the majority of women's/assorted parasites vote with logic did they?
EDIT:
And there it is. "You won't get the puzzy/MRA,MGTOW,PUA's baaaaad" 4 posts but we got there.DemFeeelz said:
*Takes a bow*
Im not really interested in the social aspect of politics, the emotional side as you put it - although sadly this is what most people vote on, abortion, gays, guns, other idiotic wedge issues, etc.. I think we are all grown ups and can make our own choices.( . )( . ) said:
What I am interested in is the economic side of it, which has had serious, shameful consequences on our country. This is the part almost no one has ang clue about, and that needs to change.
Well I have always been honest on here. I am not good looking, and I'm Indian which are two things stacked against me. I'm very smart which has never worked for me, and I'm quite tall.
Smart indian guys generally don't pull tons of HBs. It's reserved for jacked white guys and black guys.
If you don't believe me, go to South Beach this weekend.
Smart indian guys generally don't pull tons of HBs. It's reserved for jacked white guys and black guys.
If you don't believe me, go to South Beach this weekend.
Let me know when you figure out WHY you disagree, if you have gone that far yetPairPlusRoyalFlush said:
There is nothing vulgar about it, no -ism's. It is simple accounting. Public sector deficit = private sector surplus. Seriously check the links if you get some time, have learned and studied this kinda stuff for many years.