MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 12,731
- Reaction score
- 5,151
"The Kiss of Death Mistake"
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
What do you think about this new dating site?
- Thread starter MatureDJ
- Start date
"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Boilermaker
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,332
- Reaction score
- 76
another variant of the "sugar daddy" concept.
Attraction is not a choice. And you can't buy it.
Attraction is not a choice. And you can't buy it.
interesting! I actually think the concept is great. Kind of a sociological experiment. I dig it, while most of the 'generous' people are men and 'attractive' people are women, it seems that you can decide which you feel you fall into and go from there.
It would be interesting to put up two profiles, one in each section, and see the differences in reactions.
I think it's a very interesting concept. The majority of men pay for sex anyway in one way or another, it's cool to put an actual dollar-amount on where you stand (as far as internet dating goes at least, which is often more difficult than in-person pickup).
It's also an interesting business model. I assume since the site doesn't charge members any monthly fees, they take a cut of what the 'generous' folks will pay for the 'attractive' folks. Cool and innovative. EDIT: ermm... just signed up and this doesnt appear to be the case.
Now if they lumped all men into the 'generous' section and all women into the 'attractive' section, that would suck. But they let you make the choice, so it's all good. I think I'll put profiles in each and see what's up. I love studying the mating market, fascinating stuff.
EDIT: Checked it out, found out how payment works, and I think this is the big downside and will eventually sink it: The "generous" people have to pay to unlock communication. And it ain't cheap. I think this means that an "attractive" person can't initiate contact with an offer. Say you're a hot guy and you see some cougar and you want to offer to go out with her if she pays you $50 or whatever, I don't think you can do that.
So the transaction fees are going to kill it I think. Plus the fact that there is no "escrow." It suggests the payor pay half at the start of the date and half when it's over but, really, how is that enforceable? And if the "attractive" person has sex with the "generous" person during the date would that be considered prostitution, and could the site itself be engaged in "pimping?" Kind of an interesting legal question.
It would be interesting to put up two profiles, one in each section, and see the differences in reactions.
I think it's a very interesting concept. The majority of men pay for sex anyway in one way or another, it's cool to put an actual dollar-amount on where you stand (as far as internet dating goes at least, which is often more difficult than in-person pickup).
It's also an interesting business model. I assume since the site doesn't charge members any monthly fees, they take a cut of what the 'generous' folks will pay for the 'attractive' folks. Cool and innovative. EDIT: ermm... just signed up and this doesnt appear to be the case.
Now if they lumped all men into the 'generous' section and all women into the 'attractive' section, that would suck. But they let you make the choice, so it's all good. I think I'll put profiles in each and see what's up. I love studying the mating market, fascinating stuff.
EDIT: Checked it out, found out how payment works, and I think this is the big downside and will eventually sink it: The "generous" people have to pay to unlock communication. And it ain't cheap. I think this means that an "attractive" person can't initiate contact with an offer. Say you're a hot guy and you see some cougar and you want to offer to go out with her if she pays you $50 or whatever, I don't think you can do that.
So the transaction fees are going to kill it I think. Plus the fact that there is no "escrow." It suggests the payor pay half at the start of the date and half when it's over but, really, how is that enforceable? And if the "attractive" person has sex with the "generous" person during the date would that be considered prostitution, and could the site itself be engaged in "pimping?" Kind of an interesting legal question.
Last edited:
"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
backbreaker
Master Don Juan
we are creating a Muslim only dating site
http://vkunjdemo.com/17472/
we still have a few months of work left but I think the site is going take off.
http://vkunjdemo.com/17472/
we still have a few months of work left but I think the site is going take off.
Wow. The founder looks like the typical rich nerd who will just pay for it. At least he knows what part of the game he's in, and while he's been a trick for some time, now he's learned to pimp out other tricks and get their money. So you go trick pimp, pimp on!