interesting! I actually think the concept is great. Kind of a sociological experiment. I dig it, while most of the 'generous' people are men and 'attractive' people are women, it seems that you can decide which you feel you fall into and go from there.
It would be interesting to put up two profiles, one in each section, and see the differences in reactions.
I think it's a very interesting concept. The majority of men pay for sex anyway in one way or another, it's cool to put an actual dollar-amount on where you stand (as far as internet dating goes at least, which is often more difficult than in-person pickup).
It's also an interesting business model. I assume since the site doesn't charge members any monthly fees, they take a cut of what the 'generous' folks will pay for the 'attractive' folks. Cool and innovative. EDIT: ermm... just signed up and this doesnt appear to be the case.
Now if they lumped all men into the 'generous' section and all women into the 'attractive' section, that would suck. But they let you make the choice, so it's all good. I think I'll put profiles in each and see what's up. I love studying the mating market, fascinating stuff.
EDIT: Checked it out, found out how payment works, and I think this is the big downside and will eventually sink it: The "generous" people have to pay to unlock communication. And it ain't cheap. I think this means that an "attractive" person can't initiate contact with an offer. Say you're a hot guy and you see some cougar and you want to offer to go out with her if she pays you $50 or whatever, I don't think you can do that.
So the transaction fees are going to kill it I think. Plus the fact that there is no "escrow." It suggests the payor pay half at the start of the date and half when it's over but, really, how is that enforceable? And if the "attractive" person has sex with the "generous" person during the date would that be considered prostitution, and could the site itself be engaged in "pimping?" Kind of an interesting legal question.