thechosenone2190
Don Juan
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2009
- Messages
- 165
- Reaction score
- 6
According to AD and Pook, success with women is just a numbers game. Be yourself, have fun, and weed out low interest girls. Based on other threads, guys are approaching over 100 girls just to get laid maybe once or twice. To me, these numbers are quite dismal.
Is this really what it takes to get results? Isn't acting AFC for one HB way easier than just cold approaching over a hundred random women you see everyday? Acting AFC doesn't take as a large an emotional toll on your self esteem and. image, and if the female rejects your AFC chumpness/niceness/etc, then you can at least point your finger at HER for being the bad guy according to today's standards (think of all the AFC films out there the girl is supposed to feel guilty for rejecting a guy who treated her kindly and nicely). Is it just me, or didn't 99% of guys you see everyday with a girlfriend act AFC to get with the girl in the first place?
i know Pook says "patience is the refined sense of confidence." however, what does that mean? i ask this because it seems to contradict the djbible, which always instructs you to immediately next a women who flakes, has low IL, gives mixed signals etc. what if the woman simply needs more time to feel comfortable around you before seeing you as a potential romantic partner?
And doesn't evolution (based off Dawkin's book "selfish gene") tell us that females will only have sex with a male if he demonstrates to her that he is heavily invested in her and her child? in other words, a nice guy who buys her flowers chocolates etc as reassurance to her that he will not abandon her to care for the child all by herself?
what's with all the DJ advice here to play "hard to get" and "be the chooser" and "you are the great catch"? how does a female increase her genetic fitness by mating with a guy who is so full himself more so than her?
i know the advice here teaches you how to become an alpha male, the dude who got to bang all the hbs. however, back in the caveman days, how do you know that MOST females didn't mate and have monogamous relationships with beta males? the ones who would invest all their resources in her and her child to guarantee that their genes were passed along? in fact, research shows, based on the size of our testicles, that humans from prehistoric times were for the most part monogamous, the same exact way we are today. (explanation: large testicles are required for genes to succeed in a polygamous environment. larger testicles=more sperm released. more sperm needs to be pumped into a female to ensure you impregnate her if every other guy is also banging her if everyone is polygamous. compared to other types of monkeys, our testicle size is more on the smaller end of the scale)
did alpha males really own such a bigger share of the resources/pie than beta males to the extent that most females simply mated with the alpha male? does a female really improve her fitness by mating with some filthy rich alpha male who is likely to have multiple partners vs a beta male who is willing to sacrifice his life just to save her and her child's?
i feel like the advice given here is only good for attracting nutcase BPDs and low quality slvts. what high quality, very attractive, and intelligent HB would give away her phone number so easily and date some random guy who out of NO WHERE hits on her in public and speaks to her for several minutes?
***********************
going slightly off topic here...
is it possible that a guy has to act more AFC to succeed with women that are equally good looking or slightly less good looking as the guy? so she doesn't feel like you're out of her league?
honestly, i've never acted afc in my entire life to a girl, so i may be biased. my extremely protective and traditional parent told me not to chase girls in middle school, and i actually listened to her. i turned down many HBs back in the day, and for some reason, they kept coming back. i never got to experience what it's like to actually act AFC to HBs who showed interest in me. kinda regret it
Is this really what it takes to get results? Isn't acting AFC for one HB way easier than just cold approaching over a hundred random women you see everyday? Acting AFC doesn't take as a large an emotional toll on your self esteem and. image, and if the female rejects your AFC chumpness/niceness/etc, then you can at least point your finger at HER for being the bad guy according to today's standards (think of all the AFC films out there the girl is supposed to feel guilty for rejecting a guy who treated her kindly and nicely). Is it just me, or didn't 99% of guys you see everyday with a girlfriend act AFC to get with the girl in the first place?
i know Pook says "patience is the refined sense of confidence." however, what does that mean? i ask this because it seems to contradict the djbible, which always instructs you to immediately next a women who flakes, has low IL, gives mixed signals etc. what if the woman simply needs more time to feel comfortable around you before seeing you as a potential romantic partner?
And doesn't evolution (based off Dawkin's book "selfish gene") tell us that females will only have sex with a male if he demonstrates to her that he is heavily invested in her and her child? in other words, a nice guy who buys her flowers chocolates etc as reassurance to her that he will not abandon her to care for the child all by herself?
what's with all the DJ advice here to play "hard to get" and "be the chooser" and "you are the great catch"? how does a female increase her genetic fitness by mating with a guy who is so full himself more so than her?
i know the advice here teaches you how to become an alpha male, the dude who got to bang all the hbs. however, back in the caveman days, how do you know that MOST females didn't mate and have monogamous relationships with beta males? the ones who would invest all their resources in her and her child to guarantee that their genes were passed along? in fact, research shows, based on the size of our testicles, that humans from prehistoric times were for the most part monogamous, the same exact way we are today. (explanation: large testicles are required for genes to succeed in a polygamous environment. larger testicles=more sperm released. more sperm needs to be pumped into a female to ensure you impregnate her if every other guy is also banging her if everyone is polygamous. compared to other types of monkeys, our testicle size is more on the smaller end of the scale)
did alpha males really own such a bigger share of the resources/pie than beta males to the extent that most females simply mated with the alpha male? does a female really improve her fitness by mating with some filthy rich alpha male who is likely to have multiple partners vs a beta male who is willing to sacrifice his life just to save her and her child's?
i feel like the advice given here is only good for attracting nutcase BPDs and low quality slvts. what high quality, very attractive, and intelligent HB would give away her phone number so easily and date some random guy who out of NO WHERE hits on her in public and speaks to her for several minutes?
***********************
going slightly off topic here...
is it possible that a guy has to act more AFC to succeed with women that are equally good looking or slightly less good looking as the guy? so she doesn't feel like you're out of her league?
honestly, i've never acted afc in my entire life to a girl, so i may be biased. my extremely protective and traditional parent told me not to chase girls in middle school, and i actually listened to her. i turned down many HBs back in the day, and for some reason, they kept coming back. i never got to experience what it's like to actually act AFC to HBs who showed interest in me. kinda regret it