She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.
You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.
The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
Plenty of women, I'd say and the consensus on SS is more women than men lack a moral compass, but women don't commit crimes per se, they don't need to. There could be several factors for men commiting more crimes but the top would be frustration and desperation.To be honest, I'm really sick of you labeling guys "bitter" on here. There's more bitter and mean women around than men. And they're bitter for no reason but their own fault. Many of them make as much or more money as men and have their pick of guys. They just pick the wrong ones maybe.iqqi said:Do you really think that most pointless crimes are vents of sexual frustration??
I think most pointless crimes are committed by people with little to no moral compass. These people maybe alienate themselves with their lack of thought or care for others.
KontrollerX said:Oh your post is definitely a good example of how men can be idiots too joekerr no argument there.
"which is why i laugh when guys get so high and mighty on here about how men are the best and women suck."
Well I think its that way because this is basically a site for men only that women can partake in if they find out it exists but anyway this place is a site for men to vent and improve themselves without having to worry about some chick picking apart what they say.
Basically when a guy is here on this site its very much like he's with his brothers.
Still a good wake up call of a post to such guys that get too lost in the venting phase here though.
That is utter bullsh!t, and just an excuse for you to not blame yourself for picking women without morals.ketostix said:Plenty of women, I'd say and the consensus on SS is more women than men lack a moral compass
Its just flat out stupid to think someone is without morals just because of their gender. Half the assumptions I see thrown out here are plain dumb, and really just excuses for men not to seek better. Then again you have the retards who would seem to settle for any relationship, period, like the desperate sounding bunch over in the "does every pretty girl have a boyfriend." thread. I believe it was said that the only criteria to get into a relationship was 1. not be ugly 2. some other dumb crap.Mad Manic said:And your reasoning for it being utter BS is?
MM
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Don't you know that was done through God's intentions? :crackup:iqqi said:Its just flat out stupid to think someone is without morals just because of their gender.
ElChoclo said:Bad judgment, bad behaviour, but then again, in your country you had the woman in her 40s who pretended to be a young guy and made friends with a young girl on the internet (with whom she was actually acquainted since they were neighbours). She leads the girl on and then dumps her suggesting that she (the young girl) doesn't deserve to live.
Young girl then kills herself. Don't know if that woman is doing any time, but it was a lot worse, and in general I think that women do worse things than men.
This is why i love some of your postsiqqi said:Its just flat out stupid to think someone is without morals just because of their gender. Half the assumptions I see thrown out here are plain dumb, and really just excuses for men not to seek better. Then again you have the retards who would seem to settle for any relationship, period, like the desperate sounding bunch over in the "does every pretty girl have a boyfriend." thread. I believe it was said that the only criteria to get into a relationship was 1. not be ugly 2. some other dumb crap.
No wonder some of you have such a low opinion of women. Look at your standards! Some of you have none! And those of you that do... well you obviously aren't factoring in morals.
Did your mom have a moral compass?
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
Yeah well I still totally disagree with iqqi. Whether a guy has quality standards or not says nothing about how many quality women there are or how moral women are. The fact is regardless of what they say most men are happy as long as their getting sex with a nonugly girl.jonwon said:This is why i love some of your posts
Nice.